“When Biology Becomes a Barrier: Constitutionalizing Menstrual Dignity in India” A Case Comment on Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Government of India and Others Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1000 of 2022 | 2026 INSC 97 Date of Judgment: January 30, 2026 Bench: Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan When a girl’s biology becomes a reason …
Hamsaanandini Nanduri V. Union of India and others,2026 INSC 246 Supreme court of India, Decided on: 17 March,2026 FACTS Hansaanandini Nanduri ,the petitioner in the above case who was an adoptive mother who legally adopted a child above the age of three months. Like many prospective adoptive parents in India, she went through …
Case comment :- Hamsaanandini Nanduri V. Union of India and others,2026 INSC 246 Read More »
Case Citation: Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 2367 of 2023; 2025 INSC 883 Decision Date: July 22, 2025. Bench Strength: 2 Judges (Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih). Number of Opinion(s): 1 (Majority/Coram opinion delivered by Justice Augustine George Masih). Legal Provision(s): Section 498-A Indian Penal Code (Cruelty by husband or …
Court: The Supreme Court of India Citation: AIR 2021 SC 1193 Civil Appeal No: 3966 OF 2010 Date of Judgement: 19 February 2021 Bench: Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Justice Vineet Saran FACTS: The appellant, Amitabha Dasgupta, had a locker at the Kolkata branch of the United Bank of India. When he visited the bank on …
Amitabha Dasgupta vs. United Bank of India & Ors (2021) Read More »
Gayatri Balasamy v. M/S. Isg Novasoft Technologies Limited 2025 INSC 605 | Civil Appeal @ S.L.P.(C) Nos.15336-15337 of 2021 Supreme Court of India| Decided: April 30, 2025 The dispute arose out of the employment relationship between Gayatri Balasamy and ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited, an information technology company. On 27 April 2006, Gayatri Balasamy was appointed …
CASE Comment Gayatri Balasamy v. M/S. Isg Novasoft Technologies Limited Read More »
Chinthada Anand V. State Of Andhra Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 1580 of 2026 Supreme Court of India | Decided on March 24, 2026 Citation: 2026 INSC 283 FACTS The Appellant in the instant case, Chinthada Anand, was a practicing Pastor, a resident of Kothapalem Village, Pittalavanipalem Mandal, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh who conducted Sunday Prayer meetings …
CASE COMMENT Chinthada Anand V. State Of Andhra Pradesh Read More »
1. Facts of the Case 1.Disputed Property: The case relates to the land Survey No. 2029 located at Morar, Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh) consisting of 8 Bigha & 10 Biswas. 2.Case of the Plaintiffs: The appellants (Gobind Singh and others) instituted a suit in 1989 seeking a declaration of title and permanent injunction against Union of …
Gobind Singh & Others v. Union of India & Others (2026) INSC 211 Read More »
Appellant- Prakash Chimanlal Sheth Respondent- Jagruti Keyur Rajpopat Court – Supreme Court of India Judges: Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma Judgment Date: July 25, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 897 Introduction The case of Prakash Chimanlal Sheth .V. Jagruti Keyur Rajpopat deals with issue of territorial jurisdiction in cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the …
Case Commentary on – Prakash Chimanlal Sheth .V. Jagruti Keyur Rajpopat Read More »
PETITIONER TELEGRAM FZ LLC RESPONDENT UNION OF INDIA COURT HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JUDGE TEJAS KARIA J JUDGEMENT DATE 19 JUNE, 2026 CITATION W.P.(C) 8259/2026 & CM APPL.39036/2026 FACTS 1. NTA vide letter dated 21.05.2026 informed MeitY about the misuse of Telegram application by third parties in respect of Neet UG, 2026[1]. MeitY issued …
CASE COMMENTARY ON TELEGRAM FZ LLC & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Read More »
1. FACTS OF CASE The democratic framework of India rests fundamentally upon the purity, accuracy and legal validity of its electoral rolls. The genesis of Association for Democratic Reforms v. Election Commission of India (2026 INSC 564)[1] lies in an Impugned Order dated June 24, 2025, issued by the Election Commission of India (ECI)[2]. Through …
Association for Democratic Reforms v. Election Commission of India (2026 INSC 564) Read More »
Harish Rana v. Union of India, Miscellaneous Application No. 2238 of 2025 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 18225 of 2024, 2026 INSC 222 (Sup. Ct. India Mar. 11, 2026) (J.B. Pardiwala, J., for himself and K.V. Viswanathan, J., concurring). PARTICULARS OF THE CASE Particular Details Case Name Harish Rana v. Union of India Citation …
COURT: Supreme Court of India DECLARED ON: 10th November 2023 APPEALED FROM: Original Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. JUDGES: Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud (CJI), J.B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra. CITATION: 2023 INSC 1017; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1224 of 2023. PETITIONER: State of Punjab. LEGAL COUNSELS FOR THE PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS: Principal Secretary to the …
CASE NAME: State of Punjab v. Principal Secretary to the Governor of Punjab & Anr. Read More »
Case Name Sukanya Shantha v. Union of India & Ors. Citation 2024 INSC 753 WP Number Writ Petition (C) No. 1404 of 2023 Court Supreme Court of India – Civil Original Jurisdiction Bench Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud (CJI), J.B. Pardiwala J., Manoj Misra J. Date of Order 3 October 2024 Nature Writ Petition (Constitutional Challenge …
Petitioner: Dr. Jaya Thakur Respondent: Government of India & Others Bench: J.B. Pardiwala, R. Mahadevan Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: 2026 INSC 97 | Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1000 of 2022 Date of Judgement: 30 January 2026 Dr. Jaya Thakur, a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 32 of the …
[2025 INSC 1203] Supreme Court Of India Appellant: Dashwanth Respondent: State Of Tamil Nadu Bench: Justice Vikram Nath; Justice Sanjay Karol; Justice Sandeep Mehta Date of Judgment: 8 October, 2025 Facts The case concerns the alleged kidnapping, sexual assault, murder, and subsequent burning of the body of a seven-year-old girl in Chennai in 2017. The …
Appellant: Vineeta Sharma Respondents: Rakesh Sharma & Others Bench: Justice Arun Mishra, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer & Justice Mr. Shah. Date of Judgment: 11th August, 2020 Facts of the Case: Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma[1] is a landmark case resulting from a private family dispute about a property located in New Delhi. The property was …
2025 INSC 734 Case Name: Shaurabh Kumar Tripathi v. Vidhi Rawal Court: Supreme Court of India Date of Judgment: 19 May 2025 Bench: Justice Abhay S. Oka & Justice Ujjal Bhuyan Case Number: Criminal Appeal No. 2688 of 2025 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 9493 of 2024), along with connected appeals. 1. FACTS The …
The Tamil Nadu Special Reservation of Seats in Educational Institutions including Private Educational Institutions and of Appointments or Posts in the Services under the State within the Reservation for the Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities Act, 2021 (henceforth referred to as “the 2021 Act”) came into force on February 26, 2021[1]. The Act was …
CASE COMMENT: PATTALI MAKKAL KATCHI v. A. MAYILERUMPERUMAL (2022) Read More »
Introduction Litigation is a way for getting justice but why then there is such thing as Arbitration? Arbitration is there to be a fastest and cheapest alternative to court litigation. But what happens when a judicial decision which is known as arbitral award contains errors- can court fix it, or must the entire award gets …
Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited [1] Read More »
SCC citation: (2022) 12 SCC 442. FACTS Two young Girls of age 8 and 9 years old on December 2005 were playing near a neighbour’s house, the neighbour who was in acquaintance with these girls lured them for coming to his house by promising them money in return. Once they reached his Home the accused …
Citation: 2025 INSC 1308 Bench: B.R. Gavai CJI, Surya Kant J., Vikram Nath J. Judgement date: November 11, 2025 Court: Supreme Court of India FACTS The Nithari serial killings first hit the headlines in December 2006 when the police found the skeletal remains of children and women in a drain near House No. D-5, Sector …
FACTS A crass remark about parental incest on a YouTube broadcast called “India’s Got Latent” plunged podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia – known online as “BeerBiceps” – into a massive legal storm.[1] Allahbadia, who commands a massive digital following, posed a highly explicit question to a contestant during a recent episode. Delivered casually, the remark instantly triggered …
“Free and fair elections are the foundation on which the edifice of democracy rests.” Topic: Independence of the Election Commission of India Court: Supreme Court of India Name of the Petitioner: Anoop Baranwal Name of the Respondent: Union Of India Bench: Honourable Justice K.M. Joseph, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy and C.T. Ravikumar Date …
CASE COMMENT ON ANOOP BARANWAL v. UNION OF INDIA (2023) Read More »
Facts On 13 January 2026, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the decision of Dinesh Biwaji Ashtikar v. State of Maharashtra, addressed the prevailing gap between the constitutional guarantee of education under Article 21A and its practical implementation through the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act). In this case, the …
Date of Judgement: – October 17, 2023 Petitioner: – Supriyo Chakraborty, Abhay Dang, Parth Phiroze Mehrotra, Uday Raj Anand Respondent: – Union of India Bench: – CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, J. S.K. Kaul, J. S.R. Bhat, J. Hima Kohli, J. P.S. Narasimha Introduction The case of Supriyo @ Supriyo Chakraborty & Anr. v. Union of India, …
Supriyo @ Supriyo Chakraborty & Anr. v. Union of India, 2023 Read More »
US-Israel v. Iran Case Study Abstract The article examines the continuing relevance of the United Nations (UN) in the context of contemporary conflict, with particular reference to the ongoing tensions involving the United States, Israel and Iran. Rather than treating relevance as a binary question, the paper argues threat the UN’s role must be understood …
Examining the Relevance of the UN in present-day scenario: Read More »
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1011 of 2022 Supreme Court of India | Decided: October 17, 2023 1. FACTS Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. v. Union of India[1] was a batch of Petitions filed in the Supreme Court of India seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage in India. The two lead petitioners, Supriyo Chakraborty and …
CASE COMMENT Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. v. Union of India Read More »
1. INTRODUCTION Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamil Nadu stands as a significant pronouncement on the evidentiary threshold required in criminal trials resting exclusively on circumstantial evidence, particularly where the ultimate punishment of death is imposed. The case concerns a gruesome double homicide that occurred in a forest area in Theni District, Tamil Nadu, …
CASE TITLE: ABHINAV MOHAN DELKAR V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. (2025) CITATION: (2025 LiveLaw SC) 812 BENCH: CJI BR Gavai & Justice K. Vinod Chandran DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 18 AUGUST 2025 INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court case of Abhinav Mohan Delkar v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.[1] addresses one of the difficult intersections of criminal …
ABHINAV MOHAN DELKAR V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ORS. (2025) Read More »
FACTS. [1]The Case arose out of discrepancies before the Hon’ble Supreme Court faced by enormous real estate developers, including [2]m/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. The [3]Real Estate (Regulation and Development ) Act, 2016, was introduced to regulate the real estate sector and specifically to protect the interests of homebuyers. The appeals challenged the …
M/S NEWTECH PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. V. STATE OF UP & ORS. (2021) Read More »
FACTS. [1]The Case arose out of discrepancies before the Hon’ble Supreme Court faced by enormous real estate developers, including [2]m/s Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. The [3]Real Estate (Regulation and Development ) Act, 2016, was introduced to regulate the real estate sector and specifically to protect the interests of homebuyers. The appeals challenged the …
M/S NEWTECH PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. V. STATE OF UP & ORS. (2021) Read More »
FACTS – ISSUE – The appellant ANVERSINH impugns the judgment pronounced by the High Court of Gujarat dated 28-7-2009 , by which his conviction under section 64 of BNS 2023 was overturned ,but the charge of kidnapping under section 137 & 87 of BNS 2023 Was upheld and consequential sentence of imprisonment of 5 …
ANVERSINH@ KIRANSINH FATESINH ZALA V THE STATE OF GUJARAT SC 2021 Read More »
ABSTRACT India is changing fast, with all this digital stuff taking over everything from business to how the government works to even daily chats. Programs like Digital India have pushed things along, plus more people getting internet and using Aadhaar for everything, and then there’s UPI making payments super quick. It seems like India is …
NEED FOR THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT 2.0: TO TACKLE TECH-DRIVEN INDIA Read More »
JANHIT ABHIYAN V. UNION OF INDIA 1. FACTS A constitutional challenge to the Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 which added Articles 15(6)[1], The Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India[2] case came about because of articles 15(6) and 16(6) of the Constitution of India. The Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) of citizens, which are …
State of Tamil Nadu vs Governor of Tamil Nadu and Anr 2025 insc 481 Facts The case of State of Tamil Nadu vs Governor of Tamil Nadu arose from a constitutional deadlock concerning the Governor’s inaction on several bills passed by the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly. These bills, dealing with key areas such …
Case Comment: State of Tamil Nadu vs Governor of Tamil Nadu and Anr (2025) Read More »
1. FACTS Byju’s, an ed-tech company, was the official sponsor of the Indian cricket team under an agreement with the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). The sponsorship deal, valued at millions of dollars, required Byju’s to make scheduled payments to BCCI. However, due to financial difficulties and restructuring issues, Byju’s allegedly defaulted …
INTRODUCTION The Delhi High Court has issued orders to protect [1]the personality rights of celebrities and public figures from unauthorized commercial use. These individuals sought legal action against the misuse of their names, photos, and AI-generated content. The court has granted interim injunctions and John Doe orders to remove unauthorized content and prevent misuse of …
(2022) 1 HCC (Kar) 20[1] FACTS In the case above, the Hindu biological parents and Muslim adoptive parents entered in to an unregistered agreement stating that once the child is born, the adoptive parents would be raising the child as per their agreement, although the agreement specified no money as consideration between the parties. The …
Citation: 2019 (16) SCALE 40, 2019 SCC OnLine SC 1459 Name of the Appellant: Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India. Name of the respondent: Subhash Chandra Agarwal Name of the court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice N.V. Ramana, Justice Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice Deepak Gupta and Justice Sanjiv …
Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India V. Subhash Chandra Agarwal Read More »
Case Title: All India Judges Association and Others v. Union of India and Others Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: Writ Petition (C) No. 1022 of 1989 Bench: B.R. Gavai (CJI), Augustine George Masih (J), K. Vinod Chandran (J) Date of Judgement: 20th May 2025 INTRODUCTION This judgement marked a pivotal moment in Judicial reform …
INTRODUCTION Arrest and bail form the backbone of criminal procedure, yet they remain among the most misused aspects of the Indian criminal justice system. Despite constitutional guarantees and statutory safeguards, arrest is often treated as a routine step rather than an exception. Bail, instead of being a rule, frequently becomes a privilege that is difficult …
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation(2022) 10 SCC 51 Read More »
Facts of the Case: On November 16, 2005, the marriage between the Appellant (Neha Tyagi) and the Respondent (Deepak Tyagi) was solemnised following all the Hindu rites and customs. The marriage was said to be consummated during their short stay at Kolkata. The couple was blessed with a son, Pranav Tyagi, on February 23, 2008. …
Neha Tyagi Vs. Lieutenant Colonel Deepak Tyagi (2022) 3 SCC 86 Read More »
Citation: 2024 INSC 113 Judgement date: 15 February 2024 Bench (5‑Judge Constitution Bench): D. Y. Chandrachud (then Chief Justice), Sanjiv Khanna, B. R. Gavai, J. B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, JJ. Facts The Ministry of Finance, on 2nd January 2018, notified the Electoral Bond Scheme under section 31(3) of the RBI Act, 1934[1]. Electoral bonds are bearer banking …
Citation: State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh, 2024 INSC 562 (India) FACTS The case arose from Punjab’s effort to ensure equitable distribution of reservation benefits within the Scheduled Castes category.[1] In 1975, Punjab issued an administrative circular reserving 50% of SC vacancies for Balmikis and Mazhabi Sikhs, communities identified as more disadvantaged within the SC …
CASE COMMENT: STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS v. DAVINDER SINGH & OTHERS (2024) Read More »
Citation – Civil Appeal No. 2382 of 2025, Supreme Court of India (Apr. 21, 2025) FACTS:- Issues Raised APPELLANT’S CONTENTIONS (ELECTROSTEEL STEEL LTD.) The Appellant contended that the High Court erred in holding that the claim of Ispat Carrier had not been settled. In reality, the claim was fully addressed under the NCLT-approved resolution plan …
ELECTROSTEEL STEEL LTD. V. ISPAT CARRIER PVT. LTD. Read More »
Jurisdiction:Supreme Court of India Citation:Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 278 of 2023Decided on: 19 December 2024 Bench:Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice N.K. Singh Area of Law:Family Law – Divorce, Transfer of Proceedings, Misuse of Criminal Provisions Statutes Involved: FACTS ISSUES RAISED CONTENTION Petitioner’s Side (Rinku Baheti) Respondent’s Side (Sandesh Sharda) RATIONALE The Supreme Court decided to …
INTRODUCTION In the recent milestone judgment in the case of Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh[1], decided on 25 July 2025, the Supreme Court has made a revolutionary disclosure by expressly recognizing mental health as a part of the constitutional right to life under Article 21. The case had arisen out of the suicide …
Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025 INSC 893) Read More »
FACTS The case arose by way of a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 3543 of 2020 filed by Paramvir Singh Saini. The petitioner raised issues regarding the installation and status of CCTV cameras in police stations across States and Union Territories, and the need for audio-video recording of statements under Section 161(3) of the Code …
The case arose from one of the most contentious disputes in independent India, concerning ownership of a 2.77-acre parcel of land in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. Hindus considered it the birthplace (janmasthan) of Lord Ram, while Muslims considered it the site of the Babri Masjid, constructed in 1528 by Mir Baqi, a general of the Mughal …
Case Comment: M. Siddiq (Dead) Through LRs v. Mahant Suresh Das & Ors. (2019) Read More »
Shivansh Sharma Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University, Visakhapatnam A Case Comment Submitted for the Virtual Internship Program The Amikus Qriae September 2025 Date of Submission: 2nd October 2025 FACTS The central legal question in this case concerned the State of Punjab’s power to create sub-classifications within the Scheduled Castes (SCs) for the purpose of reservation …
State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh, (2025) 1 SCC 1 Read More »
Facts of the Case On 29 July 2016, KaushalKishor [1]His family was traveling from Noida to Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh, to attend a relative’s funeral. On National Highway-91, armed assailants intercepted their vehicle, looted cash and jewelry, and gang-raped the petitioner’s wife and minor daughter. The next day, an FIR was lodged with the U.P. Police …
Case Commentary: KaushalKishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) Read More »
OM PRAKASH @ ISRAEL @ RAJU @ RAJU DAS …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. …RESPONDENT(S) CITATION 2025 INSC 43 BENCH Justice M.M. Sundresh Justice Aravind Kumar JUDGEMENT January 8, 2025 COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT Dr. S. Muralidhar, Senior Advocate COUNSELS FOR THE RESPONDENTS Mr. K.M. Nataraj, Additional Solicitor General (ASG) …
CASE COMMENT OM PRAKASH @ ISRAEL @ RAJU VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Read More »
The Hindustan National Glass and Industries Ltd. (HNGIL) a dominant company with over 60% in the market share with multiple manufacturing plants across India catering to Pharmaceuticals, Cosmetics, F&B, and alco-beverages. A Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against HNGIL by the DBS Bank as per Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC),2016. …
INDEPENDENT SUGAR CORPORATION LIMITED vs GIRISH SRIRAM JUNEJA Read More »
CITATION: 2025 INSC 48, CRIMINAL APPEAL NI. 1927 OF 2025 BENCH: Justice J.B.Pardiwala and R.Mahadevan DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 15th April,2025 INTRODUCTION The case Pinki vs State of Uttar Pradesh and another has delivered a landmark ruling and has redefined the legal treatment of child trafficking. The landmark case revolves around the exposure of a major …
CASE TITLE: Pinki vs State Of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. (2025) Read More »
Facts The complainant (Ms. A), a lecturer M.Com & B. Ed qualified, on 5th July 2022 went to police station of Bakewar, District Etawah filed an FIR against appellant Rajnish Singh @ Soni. (Case Crime No. 269/2022). [1] Allegations date back to 2006, when appellant sneaked into complainant house at night and forcefully committed sexual …
FACTS The case involves a tragic incident in Punjab related to abetment to suicide. On 13th March 2016, an acid attack occurred against Dharminder Singh, leading to multiple offences being registered under the Indian Penal Code. Varinder Singh, Respondent No. 2, was not mentioned in the initial FIR. On 10th May 2016, Dharminder and his …
Harjinder Singh v. State of Punjab (2025) – Section 319 CrPC and Abetment to Suicide Read More »
Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. is one of the latest landmark judgement by the Supreme Court of India with a divisional bench consisting of Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Vikram Nath, passed on July 23, 2025. Facts Issues raised The following issues of primary importance were raised in this case: Contention …
The Supreme Court of India, in exercise of its constitutional powers under Article 32, heard a series of petitions regarding arbitrary demolitions of properties,without trial or due process, against persons only accused of a crime and not convicted, which were popularly perceived as an extra-legal means of punishment, a practice which was commonly referred to …
Citation: Rajnesh v. Neha & Anr., (2021) 2 SCC 324¹, Bench: Justice Indu malhotra and Justice R.Subhash Reddy , Date of Judgment: November 4, 2020 Facts This matrimonial dispute emerged when Rajnesh challenged the maintenance order passed in favor of his estranged wife Neha and their minor child. The couple’s marriage in 2013 gradually deteriorated, …
ABSTRACT: India with its diverse population and large geographic expanse result in an exceptionally high volume of litigation at all judicial levels. Millions of new cases are filed nationwide each year, and thousands of cases are scheduled for hearing in District Courts, High Courts, and the Supreme Court every day. The judicial system is under …
Abstract Stray dogs have become a major concern in India. Media reports of dog attacks and even deaths have fuelled a heated public debate. This issue has sparked intense discussions among government officials and animal welfare activists, who have different ideas on how to solve the problem. This paper explores the complex legal and ethical …
Facts: Parliament passed the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019, in January of the following year. The Indian Constitution was amended to include Articles 15(6) and 16(6), allowing the State the authority to set aside up to 10% of government employment and educational seats for the “economically weaker sections” (EWS) of society. Crucially, the amendment stated …
Case Analysis: Janhit Abhiyan v Union of India (2022) Read More »
1. FACTS The instant case arises from allegations of large-scale fraud in the procurement of cotton under the Minimum Support Price (MSP) scheme operated by the Cotton Corporation of India (CCI), a government-owned entity. The MSP system is designed to ensure farmers a minimum price for their produce, protecting them from market fluctuations. However, the …
STATE v. ELURI SRINIVASA CHAKRAVARTHI (2025) – CASE COMMENT Read More »
Citation and Case Number: Supreme Court citation: 2025 INSC 481 Writ Petition (Civil): W.P. (C) No. 1239 of 2023 FACTS Between 2020 and 2023, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly passed twelve important laws on topics like running state universities and local government. These laws were sent to the Governor for approval, as required by Article …
CASE COMMENT: State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of Tamil Nadu, (2025) Read More »