FACTS: NAME OF THE CASE: GAUTAM KUMAR DAS vs. NCT OF DELHI & ORS[1] CITATION: 2024 0 SUPREME (SC) 671 NAME OF THE APPELLANT(S): GAUTAM KUMAR DAS NAME OF THE RESPONDENT(S): NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. DATE OF THE JUDGMENT: 20TH AUGUST, 2024 COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NAME OF THE JUDGE: B.R. …
CASE COMMENT: GAUTAM KUMAR DAS vs. NCT OF DELHI & ORS Read More »
Facts [1]In the case of Y. Balaji v. Karthik Desari, the Supreme Court of India addressed serious allegations surrounding a cash-for-jobs scam involving Tamil Nadu’s Minister of Electricity and Prohibition, V. Senthil Balaji. The case revolves around accusations that Balaji accepted bribes from job aspirants in exchange for appointments to the Tamil Nadu State Transport …
Y Bala ji v. Karthik Desari; SLP (Cri.) Nos. 12779-12781 of 2023 Read More »
The case of ‘Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd. And Ors.’ revolves around the Finance Act, 2017, which was introduced on March 31, 2017. This Act made crucial changes to the structure and organization of tribunals in India. Specifically, it allowed the Central Government to set the rules concerning the qualifications, appointments, terms of …
CASE COMMENTRY Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd. And Ors. Read More »
CITATION (2023) 6 SCC 429 DATE OF JUDGMENT July 19, 2023 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Teesta Atul Setalvad RESPONDENT State of Gujarat BENCH Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice A.S. Bopanna, and Justice Dipankar Datta INTRODUCTION The case of Teesta Atul Setalvad v. State of Gujarat is a significant legal matter in the Indian …
Bench: S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, JJ. FACTS The case of Larsen Air Conditioning and Refrigration Company v. Union of India was based on a contractual dispute between the appellant company and the Union of India. The exact terms of the contract are not outlined in the judgment, but it seems that Larsen Air …
Larsen Air Conditioning and Refrigration Company v. Union of India Read More »
FACTS Amish Devgan, a well-known Indian news anchor and the owner of several channels – STAR News, Premium News, and Live India faced a serious legal headache after a number of comments he made on the air on June 15, 2020. In this broadcast, Devgan used highly abusive and derogatory four words regarding Pir Hazrat …
Case Analysis: Amish Devgan v. Union of India 2021 Read More »
The proceedings were under article 136 of the Indian constitution and arose from the interim orders of the Kerala high court on 13th January 2023 and 02nd February 2023 in a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus. A writ of habeas corpus is a legal recourse that allows a person to appeal to a …
7 November 2022 (EWS Reservation Case) Hon’ble Judges- Justice Uday Umesh Lalit (CJI), Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, Justice Bela M Trivedi, Justice J B Pardiwala, and Justice Shripathi Ravindra Bhat Case Comment: In a 3-2 majority, the Supreme Court upheld the 103rd Constitutional Amendment providing EWS reservation. With this, the Court extended the net of reservation …
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JANHIT ABHIYAN V. THE UNION OF INDIA (2022) Read More »
FACTS An application under Section 125 CrPC was filed by the appellant’s mother on October 17, 2002, on behalf of herself and her three children against her husband, the respondent. She had two sons and a daughter. Whereafter, the application of two children was rejected while that of the third child Abhilasha’s appeal for maintenance …
CASE NUMBER – W.P. (C) No.-001011 – 2022 PETITIONER – Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. RESPONDENTS – Union of India BENCH – Hon’ble Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, Hon’ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha DATE OF …
CASE COMMENT: “SUPRIYO CHAKRABORTY & ANR V. UNION OF INDIA” 2023 INSC 920 Read More »
Submission date: 19-Sep-2024 11:05AM (UTC+0800) Submission ID: 2450211496 File name: CASE_COMMENT_-_Harshada_Rajpure_-_Harshada_Rajpure.docx (19.65K) Word count: 1526 Character count: 8440 1 5 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 6 CASE_COMMENT_-_Harshada_Rajpure_- _Harshada_Rajpure.docx ORIGINALITY REPORT 12% SIMILARITY INDEX PRIMARY SOURCES 12% INTERNET SOURCES 1% PUBLICATIONS 2% STUDENT PAPERS 1 9% canonsphere.com Internet …
CASE_COMMENT_ Harshada_Rajpure- _Harshada_Rajpure.docx by Safia Nu Read More »
Facts Essar Steel India Limited, a carbon steel manufacturing company, produced steel products from iron ore. However, after 2010, the company began incurring losses, forcing it to take substantial loans from both public and private banks. Once a key player in India’s steel industry, it faced financial troubles and was classified as a Non-Performing Asset …
Committee Of Creditors of Essar Steel vs Satish Kumar Gupta,2019 Read More »
FACTS Alok Verma was appointed as the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in January 2017, marking the beginning of a significant tenure that was marred by controversies. A serious conflict arose between him and the CBI’s Special Director, Rakesh Asthana, who both accused each other of corruption, leading to a breakdown of …
Facts of the case: Issues Raised: Contention: -Classification as Distributor: Sun Pharmaceutical contended that it should not be classified as a “distributor” under the DPCO. The company argued that it did not directly fulfill the role of a distributor as defined by the DPCO, and therefore, it should not be held liable for …
M/s. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Vs Union of India (2024) Read More »
Article 105(2): No member of either House of Parliament shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in Parliament or any committee thereof. Further, no person shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of the publication by or under …
Case name: RESERVE BANK OF INDIA v. JAYANTILAL MISTRY Equivalent citations: AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 2180, AIRONLINE 2021 SC 229 Court: Supreme court of India Author: L. Nageswara Rao Bench: Vineet Saran, L. Nageswara Rao INTRODUCTION The case of Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry (2021) emerged from a series of events that …
UKSC 13 [2020] A.C. 973 Case Heard Jurisdiction of the court Counsel Justices: Type of Case: FACTS 1) A group of 126 people are the claimants in this case and are alleging that Dr. Gordon Bates had sexually abused them while doing medical tests. 2) Barclays Bank plc is the defendant in this case. 3) The medical …
Case Comment: Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] Read More »
By Gargi Singh, Symbiosis Law School, Pune Introduction:- The Ayodhya dispute (M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das) It is a notable land case in India. The Ayodhya dispute had reached the Supreme Court, specifically M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das. In this case, the Indian High Court, which had a three-judge bench, pronounced its judgement …
CASE COMMENT M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs vs Mahant Suresh Das & Ors on 9 November 2019 Read More »
Civil Appeal No. 1698 of 2020 Judges: Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran and S. Ravindra Bhat FACTS OF THE CASE The cases have been referred to the present three-judge Supreme Court Division Bench. The interpretation of Article 233 of the Indian Constitution concerning the eligibility of subordinate judicial service members for appointment as District Judges in …
Facts: i) The Kolkata Municipal Corporation (Appellant) acquired the property belonging to Mr. Bimal Kumar Shah (Respondent No. 1), located at Premises No. 106C, Narikeldanga North Road, Kolkata – 700011 (the Property), under the authority granted by Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. This section empowers the acquisition of lands and …
2020 SCC OnLine SC 994 FACTS: “Paradox of toleration is that if we extend unlimited toleration even to those who are intolerant, if we are prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed and tolerance with them. Thus, held, a tolerant society is entitled to …
CITATION-(2017)6 SSC 1 DATE OF THE JUDGMENT- 05.5.2017 COURT-Supreme court of India PETITIONERS- Mukhesh & anr. RESPONDENT- state (NCT Of Delhi) & Ors. BENCH-Dipak Mishra, R Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan. FACTS Mukhesh and Ors, vs state (NCT Of Delhi) & Ors. This case is also known as Nirbhaya rape case and Delhi rape case; On the …
Mukhesh and Ors, vs state (NCT Of Delhi) & Ors. -(2017)6 SSC 1 Read More »
AIR 2020 SC 1308 Writ Petition (Civil) Nos: 1031 and 1164 of 2019 Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice N.V Ramana, Justice R. Subhash Reddy, and Justice B.R Gavai. FACTS: In 2019, the Indian Government abrogated Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which conferred special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. The …
BACKGROUND Case Name: Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan Acts Involved: Constitution of India; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Important Provisions: Article 142, Section 13B Court: Supreme Court Bench: Justices S.K. Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Abhay S. Oka, Vikram Nath, and J.K. Maheshwari. Petitioner: Shilpa Sailesh Respondent: Varun Sreenivasan Case type: TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) / 1118/2014 Date of …
2023 INSC 468 SHILPA SAILESH v. VARUN SREENIVASAN Read More »
The case of Ravikumar Dhansukhlal Maheta & Anr. Vs. High Court of Gujarat & Ors. involves a significant legal dispute that touches upon the interpretation and application of the principle of “Merit-cum-Seniority” in the promotion process for judicial officers in the state of Gujarat. This case is pivotal in understanding how merit and seniority are …
2021 SCC Online SC 1153 FACTS: “Being women at least the sister-in-law and mother-in-law ought to have supported the prosecutrix, rather than beating her and not believing the prosecutrix.” In the case of Phool Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh[1], the Court examined a distressing incident involving sexual assault and the legal proceedings that followed. …
Petitioners: Amish Devgan Respondents: Union of India Acts involved: Indian Penal Code (IPC) Important provisions: Sections 153A, 295A, and 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66F of the IT Act [1] Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna Judgement date: December 7, 2020 FACTS ISSUES RAISED CONTENTION Contentions …
CASE BRIEF WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 160 OF 2020 Amish Devgan v. Union of India Read More »
The Amrapali Group, established in 2003, quickly became a significant player in the Indian real estate market. The company’s primary goal was to provide affordable housing to meet the increasing demand in urban areas. Headquartered in Noida, Uttar Pradesh, the group’s portfolio included residential complexes, commercial buildings, and luxury apartments. By leveraging aggressive marketing strategies …
CASECOMMENT:BIKRAMCHATTERJI & OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Read More »
FACTS SC Verdict: This judgement has thus put to rest the prevailing controversy and reinforced the maintenance rights of divorced Muslim women. ISSUES RAISED Are the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) relating to married women’s maintenance rights applicable to Muslims? This question, basically erroneous, has been raising its head ever since these …
PARTIES: TYPE OF CASE: Appellant: X Respondents: The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr Civil Appeal No 5802 of 2022 SLP (C) No 12612 of 2022 COURT: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION DATE: September 29, 2022 BENCH: J. Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J. …
PARTIES: Petitioner: Indibility Creative Pvt Ltd Respondent: Govt of West Bengal COURT: Supreme court of India DATE: April 11, 2019 BENCH: Justice D Y Chandrachud and Hemant Gupta LEGAL COUNSELS: Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Parikh Respondent: Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi FACTS: Voltaire: “I despise what you say but will defend to the death your right to …
Indibily Creative Pvt. Ltd. vs Govt. Of West Bengal on 11 April, 2019. Read More »
What the Case relates to- The Ruling of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Sita Soren vs Union of India” (UOI) is a landmark judgment. The constitution bench made a unanimous decision on the “liability of the Member of Parliament in respect to bribery under The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988” as well as legal protection …
Case Comment on Sita Soren Vs Union of India AIR 2024 SC Read More »
Facts Issues Raised Contention In favour of the Appellant In favour of Respondent Judgment The Supreme Court took the appeal into consideration and passed a judgement in favour of the appellant, validating the marriage between Hadiya and Shafin unless the National Investigation agency (hired by the respondents) can prove that the marriage in question as …
FACTS Poonam Sharma, a married homemaker, 27 years old, approached the Supreme Court of India under Article 32, seeking permission from the court to terminate her ongoing pregnancy. Even though she was utilizing the Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM), she conceived a 26-week fetus. She is the mother of two boys, aged four years and one …
FACTS The Gestational Age Act of Mississippi, which was approved in 2018, was the key controversy in the Dobbs v. Jackson case. It restricted abortions that were beyond 15 weeks of pregnancy when there was proof of urgent medical needs or extreme fetal defects. Furthermore, this law linked abortion providers to fines including license termination. Jackson Women’s …
DOBBS v. JACKSON WOMEN’s HEALTH ORGANIZATION (2022) Read More »
Facts of the Case Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya and others, the petitioners, were accused in a criminal case regarding a dispute over an agricultural land situated in Surat and involving severe offenses under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), now known as the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The investigation was completed with a written petition and the …
VINUBHAI HARIBHAI MALAVIYA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT. 2019 (SC) 5233 Read More »
Facts of the case The current case pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLA’s) of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly against the disqualification orders issued by the Speaker of the assembly. The disqualification petition was lodged with the Speaker against five MLA’s from the ruling party on 11.02.2019. …
SHRIMANTH BALASAHEB PATIL VS HON’BLE SPEAKER KARNATAKA, 2020 (2) SCC 595 Read More »
Case name: PURNO AGITOK SANGMA VS PRANAB MUKHERJEE Citation: (2013) 2 SCC 239 Petitioner: Purno Agitok Sangma Responder: Pranab Mukherjee Petitioner Counsel: Learned Senior Advocate Ram Jethmalani Responder Counsel: Learned Senior Advocate Harish Salve FACTS: The case revolves around the 2012 presidential election between Purno Agitok Sangma and Pranab Mukherjee. Sangma challenged Mukherjee’s eligibility, claiming …
Purno Agitok Sangma vs. Pranab Mukherjee (2013) 2 SCC 239 Read More »
Petitioner: Ritu Chabbaria Respondent: Union of India and Others Bench: Justice Krishna Murari, Justice C.T Ravikumar Date of Judgement: April 26, 2023 Petition: Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 60 of 2023 Citation: 2023 SCC OnLine 502 Facts: In this case, Ritu Chabbaria, wife of the accused, moved to the Supreme Court of India with an aim …
FACTS: The case of Joseph Shine v. Union of India was a landmark judgment from the Supreme Court of India in 2018. “The case challenged the constitutionality of Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 198 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).” Section 497 of the IPC criminalized adultery and only …
1. FACTS Rajul Rai vs. State of Uttar Pradesh is an important case that examines criminal liability and procedural fairness in the Indian legal system. The event that sparked the case occurred on the night of July 10, 2018, in the village of Nainpur, District Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. Incident Details: That night, Rajul Rai and …
FACTS: ISSUES RAISED: 1. “Whether it is true that the insurer had locus standi to file the subrogee complaint? 2. Whether the Appellant-hotel, under the laws of bailment or elsewhere, will be held liable for the theft of the car taken for valet parking? 3. Whether it is possible for the Appellant-hotel to be released …
TAJ MAHAL HOTEL V. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD AND ORS. [SC/1566/2019] Read More »
Alok Kumar Verma was appointed as the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on February 1, 2017, for a fixed tenure of two years. His tenure saw significant turmoil due to internal conflicts within the CBI, particularly with Rakesh Asthana, the Special Director of the agency. The conflict between Verma and Asthana led …
Case Citation: WP (C) 419/2016 Judges: D Y Chandrachud (CJI), Surya Kant J, Vikram Nath J Facts: Issues raised Contention Contentions from Petitioner’s side: Contentions from the Respondent’s side: Rationale Defects in law: Inference The Apex court in its judgment has quoted the description given by Lon Fuller on public policy issues that come up …
INDIAN EX-SERVICEMEN MOVEMENT V. UNION OF INDIA (2022) Read More »
Introduction The 20th February 2023 judgement in the case of Aparna Ajinkya Firodia vs. Ajinkya Arun Firodia is a landmark judgement of the Supreme Court of India. This case brings into discussion the legitimacy of a child born out of a valid marriage, use of DNA testing for proving paternity purposes, and safeguards available in …
APARNA AJINKYA FIRODIA VS. AJINKYA ARUN FIRODIA 2023 Read More »
FACTS The instant case was due to a contractual dispute between the appellant company and the Union of India. The exact terms of the contract are not outlined in the judgment, but it seems that Larsen Air Conditioning won some work on tender, which subsequently led to certain disputes. Thereafter, on April 22, 1997, the …
Larsen Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Company v. Union of India Read More »
An appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant against a court decision made on 28th February 2008 by High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Chandigarh. The High Court upheld the judgement of the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Hoshiarpur, dated 26th July 2003. In that judgement: The appellant was found guilty under Section …
CASE COMMENT: KIRPAL SINGH V/S THE STATE OF PUNJAB (2024) Read More »
Citation: AIR 2021 SC 1441 Bench: D.Y. Chandrachud, M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna FACTS OF THE CASE The legal conflict in the case of Neena Aneja v. Jai Prakash Associates Ltd., arose from a contractual agreement between the appellant, Neena Aneja and the respondent, Jai Prakash Associates Ltd., regarding the acquisition of a residential apartment. The …
FACTS ISSUES RAISED CONTENTIONS Contentions by the Appellant – Charan Singh Contentions by State (Prosecution) RATIONALE The Supreme Court’s decision to allow the appeal and set aside the High Court’s judgment was based on the following rationale: . The Court emphasized that mere unnatural death of a woman in her matrimonial home within seven years …
CHARAN SINGH@ CHARANJIT SINGH V. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND, 2023 Read More »
INTRODUCTION “Create the right environment before you work on the future. There’s nothing worse than walking through hell to get to heaven” -Troy Gathers Development and Environment both are inversely proportional to each other. If we chose development, there will be an adverse impact on environment and if environment is prioritized then development will eventually …
CASE COMMENT ON M.K. RANJITSINH V. UNION OF INDIA (GREAT INDIAN BUSTARD CASE) Read More »
FACTS The present case is a review petition filed by the petitioner (Karnail Singh and other landowners) against the defendant (State of Haryana) challenging the previous judgement of the court that was passed on 7th April 2022 in Civil Appeal No 6990 of 2014. Haryana Government through a gazette notification in February 1992, added a …
{TRP Scam Case} Facts The controversy also known as “TRP Scam Case.” Where in 2020, Mumbai Police arrested several individuals including Republic TV and its editor Arnab Goswami and former employees of rating agency BARC {Broadcast Audience Research Council}. The investigation revealed that some of the channels were using unwanted means to manipulate ratings which …
The company Electrosteel Steels Limited (ESL) operates a huge steel production facility in Bokaro, Jharkhand, which leaves behind a substantial economic footprint. The company has stated that it has approximately 3,000 regular and 7,000 contractual employees, and its steel production stands valued at Rs.4,200 crores. On top of this, the plant also indirectly has around …
ELECTROSTEEL STEELS LIMITED VS UNION OF INDIA, 2021 Read More »
Fouzaan Ahsan1 The Supreme Court of India decided the matter of Neha Chawla vs. Virender Chawla and Anr. on October 4, 2019. This case emerged from a complaint filed by Neha Chawla against her brothers-in- law, Virender Chawla and another respondent, under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Neha Chawla took her marriage vows in the …
Neha Chawla vs. Virender Chawla and Anr. (CRR – 1503 – 2019) Read More »
• FACTS The Amrapali Group, established in 2003, quickly became a significant player in the Indian real estate market. The company’s primary goal was to provide affordable housing to meet the increasing demand in urban areas. Headquartered in Noida, Uttar Pradesh, the group’s portfolio included residential complexes, commercial buildings, and luxury apartments. By leveraging aggressive …
CASE COMMENT: BIKRAMCHATTERJI & OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Read More »
Appellant: Chebrolu Leela Prasad Rao & Ors. Respondent: State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. Court: Supreme Court of India Case Number: Appeal (Civil) No. 3609 of 2002 Citation: 2020 SCC Online SC 383 Bench: Justice Arun Mishra; Justice Indira Banerjee; Justice Vineet Saran; Justice M.R.Shah and Justice Aniruddha Bose Date of Judgment: 22nd April 2020 …
CASE COMMENT ON CHEBROLU LEELA PRASAD RAO AND ORS. V. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. Read More »
(HATHRAS GANG RAPE CASE) CASE COMMENTARY Petitioner: – Satyama Dubey Respondent: – Union of India Writ Petition no: – 296/2020 Court: – Supreme Court of India (Criminal Court of Jurisdiction) Date of judgement: – 2nd march 2023 Judges bench: – Justice Jaspreet Singh & Justice Rajan Roy Charges: – Murder (302 IPC), Gang Rape (376D …
Decided on: 06th May, 2021 Bench: Dr. D.Y Chandrachud and M.R Shaw, JJ[i] Facts On 26th February 2021, the Election Commission of India (ECI) announced General Elections to the Legislative Assemblies of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal, Assam, and Puducherry. Accordingly, the elections in the State of Tamil Nadu were scheduled such that the polling …
Chief Election Commissioner of India vs M.R Vijayabhaskar and Others Read More »
Facts In November 2022, a group of 21 same sex couples led by petitioners Supriyo (aka Supriya Chakraborty) and Abhay Dhang approached the Supreme court seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage under various Indian laws. The petitioners sought judicial intervention to challenge non recognition under laws like the Special Marriage Act, of 1954, the Foreign …
Supreme Court of India Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. versus Union of India Read More »
2024 SCC OnLine SC 581 (Decided on April 23, 2024, before Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Aravind Kumar) Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr. Subhash Chandran Kr, Adv. Ms. Krishna Lr, Adv. Mr. Biju P Raman, AOR AOR Ms. Binisa Mohanty, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR (Judgment was given by Justice Sanjay Karol) …
INTRODUCTION The case of Supriyo & Anr. vs. Union of India (2023) is a significant legal case concerning the recognition of same-sex marriages in India. Building on the Supreme Court’s historic ruling in Navtej Singh Johar and Ors. vs. Union of India (2018), which decriminalized consensual same-sex relationships by declaring Section 377 of the Indian …
FACTS:- A crucial piece of legislation in India designed to halt the process of money laundering and confiscate assets linked to such activities is the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA). Its primary objectives are to prevent and manage money laundering, confiscate and forfeit assets obtained through or utilized in money laundering, and combat …
The case of Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan is a watershed moment in Indian Family Law, introducing in a unused worldview in the judiciary’s approach to conjugal issues and separate. This case bargains with critical lawful questions with respect to the scope of the Supreme Court’s powers beneath Article 142 of the Indian Constitution. The …
Case Comment on Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan [2023] 5. S.C.R. 165 Read More »
Case name: Manoharan v. State by Inspector of Police Equivalent Citation: 7 SCC 716 Date of Judgement: 7 November, 2019 Appellant: Manoharan Respondent: State by Inspector of Police, Variety Hall Police Station, Coimbatore Bench: Rohinton Fali Nariman, Sanjiv Khanna, Surya Kant Facts of the case: Issues Raised: Appellant’s Contentions: Respondent’s Contentions: Trial Court Judgement: The …