Case Comment

DATE OF THE CASE: 20 July, 2021  APPELLANT: L. Raghumani Singh  RESPONDENT: District Magistrate, Imphal West District, Manipur and Ans.   BENCH/JUDGES: Justice D.Y. Chandrachud Justice M.R. Shah  LEGAL PROVISIONS: The Constitution of India, 1949 (Article 21), The National Security Act, 1980  FACTS: Leichombam, a Manipuri activist was apprehended by the police on May 13, 2021 …

CASE: L. RAGHUMANI V. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE IMPHAL WEST DISTRICT MANIPUR.[1] Read More »

SCC ONLINE SC 660 (Criminal Appeal No.940-941 0f 2021) Facts- Gumansingh solemnized marriage with Tahera (deceased) on the date 27/04/1997, after that deceased was residing with GumanSingh and his family which includes his mother as well. Guman Singh was continuously asking his deceased wife about 25000/-rupees to bring from her father. GumanSingh wants to do …

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA GUMAN SINGH Vs STATE OF GUJRAT (2021) Read More »

Case Comment Court: Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal No. 1919 of 2010 Appellant – Anversinh @ Kiransinh Fatesinh Zala Respondent – State of Gujarat Bench: N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant, Aniruddha Bose Decided on – 12 January, 2021 Facts: The complainant ­ Kiransinh (PW­1) when came back from work on the night of 14 May, …

Anversinh @ Kiransinh Fatesinh VS. State of Gujarat Read More »

CASE NO – Writ Petition (criminal) no – 102 of 2007 COURT – Supreme Court of India CORUM – Hon’ble Justice Madan B. Lokur and Hon’ble Justice Deepak Gupta. DATE OF JUDGEMENT – May 5, 2017. INTRODUCTION – Annually, scandals at orphanages in India have disclosed how orphan’s institutions are run. The workers at these …

Re Exploitation of children in orphanages in State of Tamil Nadu v/s Union of India Read More »

1. Facts                                                                                                                                    1-2 2. Issues raised                                                                                                                        2 3. Contention                                                                                                                          2-3              4. Rationale                                                                                                                             3-4 5. Defects of law                                                                                                                     4-5 6. Inference                                                                                                                             5 Review of — Stephen L. Thaler [2021] APO 5 Date of judgement – 30 July 2021 Judgement of – BEACH J FACTS BETWEEN :  STEPHEN THALER …

THALER V. COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS (2021) Read More »

FACTS: A juvenile ‘X’, aged 16 to 18, is accused of committing an offense punishable under section 304 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), which carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment or up to ten years in prison and a fine in the first part and up to ten years in prison and …

SHILPA MITTAL V. STATE OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. (2020) Read More »

1.FACTS : G.O.Ms. No. 275 dated 5.11.1986, was issued by the Governor in exercise of power under para 5(1) of Schedule V to the Constitution of India, directing the posts of teachers in educational institutions in the scheduled areas shall be reserved for Scheduled Tribes. The Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal quashed the notification by order …

CHEBROLU LEELA PRASAD RAO v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Read More »

W. N. Allal Sundaram vs The Commissioner H.R. & C.E. Admn. Department & Ors Appellant – W. N. Allal Sundaram Respondent – The Commissioner H.R. & C.E. Admn. Department & Ors Bench – Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J Facts • The applicant’s case is that trust in the Sri Swamiya Dhamodara Perumal Temple is not …

Case Comment Read More »