Law is Blind Not The Lawyer's
The Amikus Qriae is an International Platform For The Law Students Ready To Enter The Legal Arena.
- Our Official Credentials
Registered in ministry of micro, small & medium enterprises (MSME)Government of india (UAMNO-UDYAM-WB-23-0003181)
(An ISO 9001:2015 Certified Con.)
(An ISO 9001:2015 Certified Con.)
You Are at The Right Place
After a lot of conceptualization, a gathering of committed law students came up with a plan to provide a platform to the law students and also for those who are eagerly awaiting to take up law as their career. Thus, forming The Amikus Qriae.
We plan and strive hard to provide every individual a platform to validate there strength, to review their aptitude and provide them with a chance to polish their skills.
An organization that gives you the best platform to post your legal blogs and opens doors for hundreds of opportunities to bring you closer to the legal world and provides you a valid chance to challenge your capabilities!
What All Events We Conduct
- Online Workshops
- Webinars/Seminars
- Online Certificate Courses
- Debate Competition
- Online National & International Conferences
- National Quiz Competitions
- National Speech Competitions
- Judgment Writing Competitions
- National Article/Blog Writing competitions
- Online National Moot Court Competitions.
PUBLICATIONS
Case Comment: Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020)
Citation:(2020) 3 SCC 637Court:Supreme CourtofIndiaBench: N.V. Ramana, R. Subhash Reddy, and B.R. Gavai, JJ.Date of Judgment: January 10, 2020 1. FACTS The Indian government revoked the special status of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370
CASE STUDY: JANHIT ABHIYAN V. UNION OF INDIA
1. FACTSThe case of Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India is one of the constitutional validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019. This amendment brought about 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in
SANJAY KUMAR RAI V UNION OF INDIA 2024
1. FACTS The present case arises from a private complaint filed by Kuldeep Mishra, who alleged that Sanjay Kumar Rai, the appellant, had threatened him during a telephonic conversation. The backdrop of this allegation involves
CASE TITLE: THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU V. THE GOVERNOR OF TAMIL NADU
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1239/2023 FACTS: On November 10, 2023, the Supreme Court of India addressed a critical constitutional issue regarding the delay caused by the Governor of Tamil Nadu, Ravindra Narayana Ravi, in granting
Case – R. Srinivas Kumar vs. R. Shametha (2019)
Introduction The historic R. Srinivas Kumar vs. R. Shametha ruling, delivered on 4th October 2019 by the Supreme Court of India, is a milestone development in matrimonial jurisprudence by acknowledging the aspect of irretrievable breakdown
FOUNDATION FOR MEDIA PROFESSIONALS VS. UNION OF INDIA (2020)
Introduction Case Name: Foundation for Media Professionals vs. Union of India Citations: (2020) 3 SCC 637, AIR 2020 SC 3051 Petitioners: Foundation for Media Professionals, Soayib Qureshi and Private School Association Jammu & Kashmir &
university Collaborations
Testimonials
