Citation(s): [2024] 5 S.C.R. 470; 2024 INSC 371 Date of the judgment: 22nd April, 2024 Bench/ Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, C.J., and J.B. Pardiwala, J. Legal provisions involved: 3(4)(a)[4], 3(2-C)[5], and 5[6] 8[9], and 12[10] INTRODUCTION Despite considering all of the accomplishments in the legal domain, the courts in India may nevertheless …
Citation: 2025 INSC 264 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice Surya Kant and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh Date of Judgment: 25 February 2025 Legal Provisions Involved: Article 32, Article 212(1), Article 142, Article 14, Article 19(1)(a), Article 21, & Section 151A of the Representation of People Act, 1951 1. FACTS As the Chief Whip …
Case Title: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH vs. BIHAR LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Read More »
NARENDER KUMAR GOSWAMI VS UNION OF INDIA (2025) Court: Supreme Court of IndiaDate of Decision: 16 May 2025 Case No: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 300 of 2025Hon’ble Bench: Justice Surya Kant, Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar SinghPetitioner: Narendra Kumar Goswami (Advocate, U.P. Bar Council)Respondent: Union of India & Others Statutes & Provisions Referred: Information Technology Act, 2000 …
CASE COMMENTARY NARENDER KUMAR GOSWAMI VS UNION OF INDIA (2025) Read More »
INTRODUCTION Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India[1] is a the Supreme Court case that arose after the Indian government disannulled Article 370 which ended Jammu and Kashmir’s special status.[2] After the invalidation of Article 370, there was implication of severe restrictions such as restriction on internet accessibility, restrictions on freedom of movement and assembly, and general restrictions across the region, all in August 2019. The case was brought by a journalist, Anuradha Bhasin, who challenged the legitimacy and indigenous validity of the restrictions placed upon Jammu and Kashmir, especially on freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of movement under Articles 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution.[3] FACTS …
Citation: (2020) 8 SCC 1 Date of Judgment: 27 August 2020 Bench: Justices Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Vineet Saran, M.R. Shah, Aniruddha Bose Facts of the Case: Issues Raised: Contentions of the Parties: Petitioner (State of Punjab): Respondents (Davinder Singh & Ors.): Judgment & Rationale: The Supreme Court’s Views: Decision: Defects in Law / Criticism: …
Case Name: State of Punjab vs Davinder Singh &others Read More »
IN WRIT PETITION No. 48367 OF 2018 CASE COMMENTARY 1. INTRODUCTION: The aforementioned case pertains to the issue of non-consensual intercourse within marriage, generally accounts to as marital rape. Marital rape is rape committed within the arrangement of marriage. The offence of marital rape is committed when the husband forces sexual intercourse on his wife …
HRISHIKESH SAHOO V. STATE OF KARNATAKA & Ors 2022 SCC 371 Read More »
Date of Judgement: 30th April 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 605 Area of Law: Court’s Power to modify an Arbitral Award, Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Constitutional Bench: CJI Sanjiv Khanna, B.R. Gavai J, P.V. Sanjay Kumar J, K.V. Viswanathan J, A.G. Masih J Appellant: Gayatri Balasamy Lawyers: Senior Advocate …
Case comment- Gayatri Balasamy vs. M/S ISG Novasoft Technologies Limited Read More »
DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 15 November, 2019 CASE NUMBER: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8766-67 OF 2019 DIARY NO.24417 OF 2019 BENCH: V. Ramasubramanian, Surya Kant, R.F. Nariman CITATION: AIRONLINE 2019 SC 1494 INTRODUCTION The Essar Steel case was a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of India that significantly reshaped the understanding of judicial review and clarified …
CASE NAME: Comm. of Creditors of Essar Steel India Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta. Read More »
JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE v. S. HARISH (2024) INSC 716, decided on 23 September 2024, Supreme Court of India CASE Details – CASE NAME – JUST RIGHT FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE V. S.HARISH COURT – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA BENCH- 2 BENCH JUDGES; JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA, D.Y. CHANDRACHUD CASE TYPE – CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, CRIMINAL APPEAL …
Case comment – JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE v. S. HARISH Read More »
COMMON CAUSE (A REGD. SOCIETY) ….Petitioner VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ….Respondent MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 1699 OF 2019 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 215 OF 2005 FACTS The petitioner, Common Cause, a registered non-governmental organization, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in 2005 before …
CASE COMMENT COMMON CAUSE (A REGD. SOCIETY) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA Read More »
FACTS The issue stems from a long-standing family dispute over ancestral real estate in Bengaluru, Karnataka. According to the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) framework, the three brothers in question—C. Jayaramappa, C. Thippeswamy, and C. Eshwarappa—were joint owners of the family estate after their father passed away. On May 9, 1986, a partition deed was signed …
CASE COMMENT: Angadi Chandranna V. Shankar & Ors. (2025) Read More »
The case “Vihaan Kumar v/s the State of Haryana” is marked as a landmark case by the Supreme Court of India. It puts light on the Article 22 of the Constitution while proving the validity and importance of Section 50 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPc). The case also relies on 3 other landmark judgements …
CASE COMMENT: VIHAAN KUMAR v/s STATE OF HARYANA & ANR Read More »
RAJESH MONGA Vs HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITIED & ORS. ON 4 MARCH,2024 Civil Appeal No. 1495/2023 Bench- M.M. Sundresh, A.S. Bopanna Before the Supreme Court, New Delhi Date of order: 4.03.2024 Parties Appellant: Rajesh Monga Respondent: Housing development finance corporation limited & Ors Laws and Acts Involved Facts The appellant Rajesh Monga was in …
Citation: Writ Petition (C) No. 1022 of 1989; 2025 INSC 735 Bench: CJI B.R. Gavai, Justice A.G. Masih, Justice K. Vinod Chandran Date of Judgment: 20 May 2025 Court: Supreme Court of India FACTS OF THE CASE The case of All India Judges Association v. Union of India (2025) marks the continuation of a historic …
Case Title: All India Judges Association & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. Read More »
FACTS Deepika Singh was employed as a nursing officer at the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, a premier medical institution run by the Government of India. She was appointed to the post in the year 2009 under the Central Government employment scheme and was governed by the Central Civil Services …
Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal, (2022) SCC OnLine SC 1063 Read More »
Bench (Supreme Court of India): Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman Justice Aniruddha Bose Justice V. Ramasubramanian Date of Judgment: March 4, 2020 Petitioner Internet and Mobile Association of India (IMAI) (A not-for-profit industry body representing digital companies in India, including crypto exchange platforms like WazirX and CoinDCX.) Respondent: Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Facts Issues Contentions …
FACTS The dispute arose out of a design consultancy agreement entered into between the Respondent, HSCC (India) Ltd., and a consortium of the Applicants, Perkins Eastman Architects DPC, an architecture company based in New York, and Edifice Consultants Pvt. Ltd., formed in Mumbai, in pursuance of a tender process. Clause 24 was a part of …
PERKINS EASTMAN ARCHITECTS DPC V. HSCC (INDIA) LTD., (2020) 20 SCC 760 Read More »
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO . 289 OF 2024 PRAGYA PRASUN & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. With WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO . 49 OF 2025 AMAR JAIN vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Date of decision: 30.04.2025 Judge: Justice R.Mahadevan FACTS: The issues involved in both the writ …
CASE COMMENTARY PRAGYA PRASUN & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Read More »
Civil Appeal No. 274/2023 BENCH- Hon’ble Mr. justice B.R. Gavai and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ. Before the Supreme Court Decided on: 10.01.2023 FACTS OF THE CASE Chandigarh was designed after India’s independence as a well-planned city by the Chandigarh master plan 2031. It was designed in such a way which strictly separates residential and commercial zones …
INTRODUCTION The landmark case of accused x vs. state of Maharashtra (2019) 7 SCC1 explores the intersection of criminal procedural law and mental health in India. It highlights the significance of safeguarding human dignity under article 21 of the constitution even for individuals convicted of heinous crimes. This case is particularly notable for addressing the …
FACTS On the 28th of July, 2018, a brutal crime was reported from Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Jai Prakash, a daily-wage earning laborer living temporarily on a construction site, called a number of children to his hut by giving them money. While most of the children took the money and left, one 10 year old girl was …
ABOUT THE CASE Case title: Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr. Citation: 2025 INSC 162 Jurisdiction: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Arising out of Special Leave Petition:(Crl.) No. 13320 of 2024 Date of judgment: 7th February, 2025 Bench: Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh Petitioner: Vihaan Kumar Respondent: the state …
Appellant– Gayatri Balasamy Respondent– M/s ISG Novasoft Tech. Limited Court- Supreme Court of India (Civil Appeal Nos. Of 2025) ( Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.15336 – 15337 Of 2021) JUDGES- Hon’ble Sanjiv Khanna ,CJI , B.R. Gavai J , P.V. Sanjay Kumar J , K.V. Vishwanathan J , A.G. Masih J. Date of Judgement- …
GAYATRI BALASAMY Vs M/S ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED Read More »
FACTS In the case of All India Judges Association v. Union of India, a batch of interlocutory applications were heard before the Supreme Court of India with its judgement delivered on May 20, 2025 by Justice BR Gavai. These applications raise fundamental issues relating to qualification, promotion and selection processes of candidates aspiring to enter …
Name of Court: The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Date of Judgement: January 8, 2024 Type of Case: This particular case is one of Constitutional law with elements of Criminal law Petitioners: Subhashini Ali; Bilkis Bano; Roop Rekha Verma; Revati Laul Respondent: The State of Gujarat Legal Counsel: Judges on Bench: Justice B.V. Nagarathna and …
Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India & Others, [2024] 1 S.C.R. 743 Read More »
Forensics and witnesses: Petitioner’s Arguments Respondent’s Arguments: The court’s rationale for reducing the sentence was that while the crime was “barbaric” and “shocks the conscience,” there was no evidence to suggest the murder was premeditated. The possibility that the accused “might not have realized that his act could lead to death cannot altogether be ruled …
Datta Ambo Rokade v. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read More »
Court: Supreme Court of India, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1545 OF 2025 Bench: Hon’ble Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan Legal provision: criminal-constitutional case Parties: -Appellant: IMRAN PRATAPGADHI Lawyer: Sr. Adv. Kapil Sibal -Respondents: STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. Lawyer: Solicitor General of India, Tushar Mehta Judgement Delivered on: 28th March, 2025 …
ABOUT THE CASE: Case Title: Internet and Mobile Association of India vs. Reserve Bank of IndiaCitation: AIR 2021 SC 2720Date of the Judgment: 4th March, 2020 Case Type: Writ Petition (Civil) Type of Bench: Three-judge benchBench Justice: V. Ramasubramanian, Aniruddha Bose, Rohinton Fali Nariman Petitioner: Internet and Mobile Association of India Respondent: Reserve Bank of …
Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India, 2020 Read More »
Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Ltd. (2025 INSC 605) INTRODUCTION This landmark ruling resolves a significant legal dispute about Indian courts’ ability to alter arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (henceforth referred to as the “1996 Act”), which resulted from Civil Appeal Nos. of 2025 (which was based on S.L.P.(C) Nos. …
CASE COMMENT Gayatri Balasamy v. ISG Novasoft Technologies Ltd. Read More »
1.FACTS Famous paint manufacturer Asian Paints Limited, which has been in business for roughly 73 years, found that fake paint products that closely resembled its packaging and bore its trademark were being sold in the market. Through a Power of Attorney, the business designated M/s Solution, an intellectual property rights (IPR) consulting firm, to keep …
ASAIN PAINTS LIMITED VS RAM BABU (2025 INSC 828) Read More »
FACTS: This writ Petition challenged the insertion of the words ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ in the Preamble of Indian Constitution by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 on the grounds of retrospectivity and, of that it was passed during emergency. ISSUES: CONTENTIONS: On behalf of Petitioner On Behalf of Respondents: Generally, the word secular was …
BALRAM SINGH V. UNION OF INDIA 2024 INSC 893(25 November 2024) Read More »
Citation: (2020) 7 SCC 469 Court: Supreme Court of India. Bench: Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Ajay Rastogi, JJ. Date of Judgment: February 17th, 2020 Introduction The Supreme Court’s judgment in The Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya & Ors. (2020) is more than just a legal milestone. It is a powerful assertion of …
The Secretary, Ministry of Defense v. Babita Puniya Read More »
Case Name– Urmila Dixit V. Sunil Sharan Dixit And OrsCitation– 2025 INSC 20Date of the Judgment– 2nd January 2025Bench – Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Chudalayil T. Ravikumar Appellant– Urmila DixitRespondent– Sunil Sharan DixitLegal Provisions Involved– Section 23rd Maintenance and welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 INTRODUCTION In any civilized society, the respect and …
Citation: AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 476, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 15 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR, JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Date of Judgment: January 7, 2020 Appellants: (1) Purshottam Chopra (2) Suresh 1. FACTS On December 18, 1997, Sher Singh was discovered suffering severe burns at a locality in Uttam Nagar, Delhi. He …
Purshottam Chopra vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Read More »
CASE: The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) Bench: Justice M.R. Shah Justice S. Abdul Nazeer Justice A.K. Sikri Laws involved: Facts: In this case, the accused persons were charged in a First Information Report (FIR) under sections 307, 294 , 323, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for an event …
CASE COMMENT The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) Read More »
Supreme Court Constitution Bench The debate over the constitutional position and the autonomy of the election commission of India (ECI) has been simmering for a long time. As per Article 324(2) of the Indian Constitution, the President, while taking into account any law made by Parliament, nominates the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and the Election …
Case Comment: Anoop Baranwal V. Union of India (2023) Read More »
Mahnoor Fatima Imran vs M/S Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt Ltd case Case Number: Special Leave Petition (C) No.1866 of 2024 Bench: Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice K. Vinod Chandran Court: Supreme Court of India Date of Judgment: 07.05.2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 646 Parties Involved: Appellants: Respondents: LAWS INVOLVED: FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT: CONTENTIONS …
CASE COMMENT Mahnoor Fatima Imran vs M/S Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt Ltd case Read More »
Case: All India Judges Association v. Union of India, W.P. (C) No. 1022 of 1989, 2025 INSC 735 (Supreme Court of India) FACTS In 1989, the All India Judges Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, for judicial directions regarding the recruitment and service …
1. Introduction One of the most puzzling problems courts have in the field of anti-corruption jurisprudence is the regular occurrence of complainants becoming antagonistic. A significant court ruling that addresses this exact conundrum is presented in the case of Neeraj Dutt v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi). In this decision, the Supreme Court considered …
Case Commentary: Neeraj Dutt v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), (2023) SCC OnLine SC 655 Read More »
1. FACTS The case of Indian Medical Association v. Union of India emerged against the backdrop of a long-standing conflict between practitioners of modern medicine (allopathy) and those practicing traditional Indian systems of medicine, collectively referred to as AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy). The petition was filed by the Indian Medical Association (IMA), …
Case Commentary: Indian Medical Association v. Union of India (2020) Read More »
Court : Supreme Court of India, New Delhi Bench : Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Augustine Geeoge Masih Petitioners : Maya P.C. and Ors. Respondents : State of Kerala and Public institutions Judgment delivered on : May 23, 2025 Laws and Acts associated with the case : The State shall not deny to …
Case Comment Maya P.C. and Ors. VS State of Kerala Read More »
Facts of the Case: The Maharashtra State Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, passed by the State of Maharashtra in 2018, gives the Maratha group a sixteen percent reservation in public jobs and educational institutions. Due to this law, Maharashtra’s overall reservation percentage increased to roughly 68%, exceeding the 50% ceiling on …
Case Comment: Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra, (2021) 8 SCC 1 Read More »
Citation: 2022 SCC Online SC 825 Bench: Hon’ble Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh Date Of Judgement: July 11, 2022 1.Case Fact: The petitioner, Satender Kumar Antil, was accused in a criminal case but was not arrested during the investigation. He was cooperating with the police, had appeared whenever called, and was even on …
CASE COMMENT: SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. Read More »
CASE: Shalini Dharmani v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others BENCH: Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud Justice J.B. Pardiwala LAWS INVOLVED: Section 80: Empowers the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities to: FACTS Shalini Dharmani is an assistant professor at Government College, Nalagarh. She is the mother of a fourteen-year-old son who …
CASE COMMENT Shalini Dharmani v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others Read More »
Parties Involved Jyostnamayee Mishra (Petitioner) Versus The State of Odisha and Others (Respondent) Hon’ble Judges J.K. Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. Laws involved Facts of the Case Jyostnamayee Mishra was joined service in 1978, working as a peon in the department of architecture, Government of Orissa. She applied to be promoted to the post of …
CASE COMMENT Jyostnamayee Mishra Versus The State of Odisha and Others Read More »
Petition Type: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 838 of 2019 Bench: Hon’ble Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud (CJI), Hon’ble J.B. Pardiwala, and Hon’ble Manoj Misra Date of Judgment: April 19, 2024 1. Facts of the Case The case revolves around the conservation of two critically endangered avian species: the Great Indian Bustard (GIB) and the Lesser Florican. The …
Case Commentary: M.K. Ranjitsinh & Ors. v. Union of India Read More »
Facts of the Case: The Maharashtra State Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, passed by the State of Maharashtra in 2018, gives the Maratha group a sixteen percent reservation in public jobs and educational institutions. Due to this law, Maharashtra’s overall reservation percentage increased to roughly 68%, exceeding the 50% ceiling on …
Case Comment: Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra, (2021) 8 SCC 1 Read More »
CASE COMMENT: SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. Citation: 2022 SCC Online SC 825 Bench: Hon’ble Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh Date Of Judgement: July 11, 2022 1.Case Fact: The petitioner, Satender Kumar Antil, was accused in a criminal case but was not arrested during the investigation. He was cooperating with …
SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. Read More »
CASE: Shalini Dharmani v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others BENCH: Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud Justice J.B. Pardiwala LAWS INVOLVED: Section 80: Empowers the State Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities to: FACTS Shalini Dharmani is an assistant professor at Government College, Nalagarh. She is the mother of a fourteen-year-old son who …
CASE COMMENT Shalini Dharmani v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others Read More »
Parties Involved Jyostnamayee Mishra (Petitioner) Versus The State of Odisha and Others (Respondent) Hon’ble Judges J.K. Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal, JJ. Laws involved Facts of the Case Jyostnamayee Mishra was joined service in 1978, working as a peon in the department of architecture, Government of Orissa. She applied to be promoted to the post of …
CASE COMMENT Jyostnamayee Mishra Versus The State of Odisha and Others Read More »
OM PRAKASH @ ISRAEL @ RAJU @ RAJU DAS …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. …RESPONDENT(S) CITATION 2025 INSC 43 BENCH Justice M.M. SundreshJustice Aravind Kumar JUDGEMENT January 8, 2025 COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT Dr. S. Muralidhar, Senior Advocate COUNSELS FOR THE RESPONDENTS Mr. K.M. Nataraj, Additional Solicitor General (ASG)Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Advocate FACTS: …
CASE COMMENT RAJU DAS…APPELLANT VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Read More »
ABOUT THE CASE: Title: Vihan Kumar vs The State of Haryana Citation: 2025 INSC 162 Jurisdiction: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Date of the Judgment: 07th February 2025 Bench: Justice Abhay S. Oka Petitioner: Vihan Kumar Respondent: The State of Haryana Legal Provisions Involved: Article 22 of the Constitution of India, Sub-section (1) of Section 41 of …
Vihan Kumar vs The State of Haryana on 7th February, 2025 Read More »
Supreme Court of India, Civil Appeal No. 5783 of 2022, judgment dated 23 August 2022 For Special Leave Petition– Bench: Hima Kohli, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana Review Order dated 18 October 2024 For Review Petition– Bench: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud FACTS OF THE CASE In relation to tax enforcement, corporate structuring, and constitutional …
UNION OF INDIA V. M/S. GANPATI DEALCOM PVT. LTD. Read More »
NARENDER KUMAR GOSWAMI VS UNION OF INDIA (2025) Court: Supreme Court of IndiaDate of Decision: 16 May 2025 Case No: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 300 of 2025Hon’ble Bench: Justice Surya Kant, Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar SinghPetitioner: Narendra Kumar Goswami (Advocate, U.P. Bar Council)Respondent: Union of India & Others Statutes & Provisions Referred: Information Technology Act, 2000 …
CASE COMMENTARY NARENDER KUMAR GOSWAMI VS UNION OF INDIA (2025) Read More »
CITATION – MANU/SC/0041/2025 CORAM – Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Arvind Kumar DECIDED ON – January 8, 2025 INTRODUCTION – The Supreme Court of India delivered the judgement on January 8, 2025 which is built on the basic principles of juvenile justice. This case commentary brings out the intricate details of the ruling which pointed …
Citation: AIRONLINE 2019 SC 1452, 2020 (2) SCC 338, (2019) 16 SCALE 1, (2019) 4 MAD LJ (CRI) 539 Bench: Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice K.M. Joseph The rationale of the Yashwant Sinha v. CBI (2019) judgment on April 10, 2019, is founded on the following core legal principles: The case …
Yashwant Sinha vs Central Bureau Of Investigation Read More »
S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 4463 of 2025 (India, decided July 19, 2025) (Supreme Court of India) 1. FACTS In this case, The Supreme Court heard bail plea of Kailash Ramchandani, a Naxal sympathizer from Gadchiroli in Maharashtra accused of IED blast in 2019 killing 15 policemen of quick response team. Kailash Ramchandani was booked under the …
INTRODUCTION In the matrimonial alliance the couple are tend to be together and supporting each other till the end of their lives.Marriage in Indian system is told and believed to be a sacred code of conduct and its the union of minds and is often based on self respect ,love ,affection and harmony in the …
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (2020)About the case: 1) Case Title- M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (2020)2) Citations- AIR online 2020 SC 6843) Jurisdiction- Original Jurisdiction under Ar. 324) Date of Judgement- 21st March 20245) Bench- Justice Arun Mishra, Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice Krishna Murari6) Petitioners- M.C. Mehta7) Respondent – Union of India8) …
CASE COMMENTARY M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (2020) Read More »
Facts Omkar Gond, the appellant, was born into a middle-class family in Latur, Maharashtra. He scored 97.2% in his tenth standard examinations. Following surgery for a bilateral cleft palate, the appellant was diagnosed with hypernasality and misarticulation. This condition causes excessive nasal resonance during speech and makes certain sounds unclear or difficult to understand, which …
Case Number: Civil Appeal No. 2368 of 2011 Decided: May 10, 2019 Decided in: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Citation: AIR 2019 SC 2723 Parties: BK Pavitra and Ors. vs Union of India, the State of Karnataka. Introduction: The government of Karnataka in 2002 enacted a legislation which granted consequential seniority to Schedule Class and …
Citation: (2025) INSC 845 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Vikram Nath, Sanjay Karol, and Sandeep Mehta, JJ. Date of Judgment: July 15, 2025 A horrific double murder occurred in the vicinity of Suruli Falls, Tamil Nadu, in May 2011. The woman had also been sexually assaulted, and the victims were a pair. Because of …
CASE COMMENT: KATTAVELLAI @ DEEVAKAR v. STATE OF TAMIL NADU, (2025) INSC 845 Read More »
Court: Supreme Court of India, Court No. 1Citation: SLPC 16864/2021Judges: Hon’ble CJI D Y Chandrachud, Hon’ble Justice J.B. Pardiwala 1. Facts The petitioner in the above case, Shalini Dharmani (further referred to as the petitioner), is an assistant professor at the Department of Geography in Government College, Nalagarh. The petitioner has a 14-year-old son who …
Shalini Dharmani v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors, (2024) Read More »
Citation: W.P. (Crl) No. 314/2021, (2021) 10 SCC 1 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Hima Kohli, Surya Kant, N.V.Ramana Date of Judgment: 27th October, 2021 Facts The Pegasus case originated as a worldwide collaborative investigation by global media organisations and by Amnesty International in July 2021, called the “Pegasus Project” collectively. The investigation also …
Case Comment: Manohar Lal Sharma V. Union Of India (Pegasus Case) 2021 Read More »