– Riya Tewatia CITATION : Pankaj Bansal vs. Union of India, 2023 SCC Online SC 1200 BENCH : Justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar JUDGEMENT : October 3, 2023 Introduction The case of Pankaj Bansal vs. Union of India (Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India, 2023) revolves around the arrest of Pankaj Bansal and Basant …
Respondents: Union Public Service Commission and ORS. Appellant: Vikash Kumar Facts of the Case: Issues: Contention: Vikash Kumar Vikash Kumar’s arguments emphasised on the definition of disability and its inclusivity. He argued that dysgraphia falls under the definition of a disability under the act. He highlighted that act’s definition covers a variety of disabilities …
Date of the judgment: February 24, 2023 Citation: Writ petition (civil) No. 172/2023 Petitioner: Adv. Vishal Tiwari, AOR. Abhigya Kushwaha, Adv. Sunita Yadav, Adv. Shailendra Mani Tripathi, Adv. Rahul Kumar, Adv. Manisha, Adv. Upendra Mani Tripathi, Adv. Aakar Shrivastav, Adv. Abhishek Jaiswal, Adv. Rajvardhan Singh. Respondent: Union of India and Ors. Bench: Hon’ble Chief Justice …
CASE COMMENT: Shailendra Mani Tripathi v. Union of India and Ors. Read More »
Case: M. Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs v. Mahant Suresh Das & Ors. Verdict Date: November 9, 2019 Submitted by: PRAGYA VAJPEYI FACTS The Ayodhya land debate centers around a location in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, accepted by Hindus to be the origin of Lord Ram. Verifiably, the location had been a point of dispute between Hindus …
(Writ Petition (Civil) no. 55 of 2019) 2022 SCC Online SC 1540 FACTS The case challenged the validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment. The Constitution 103rd Amendment Act of 2019 was passed by the Parliament of India on 9th January 2019. The act allowed for 10% reservation in higher educational institutions and initial recruitment in …
Civil Appeal Nos: 9367-9369 of 2011 Hon,ble Supreme Court of India Bench: Dr. DY Chandrachud (CJI), and Justice Hemant Gupta FACTS: In 1992, the Central Government issued a notification that permitted females to be appointed to certain selective cadres of the army, such as Short Service Commissions (SSC), Regiment of Artillery, Intelligence Corps, Army Service …
FACTS The given appeal arose from the judgement delivered by the High Court of Calcutta in 2015, in which the court quashed the complaint of the Appellant under Sections 379, 403 and 411 of the IPC. Furthermore, the appeals arise from a criminal complaint filed by the Appellant company, now under the control of Respondent …
Birla Corporation Ltd. v Adventz investments and Holdings Ltd, 2019 Read More »
Introduction The terrible episode that was developed around 2002 Gujarat riots, in the Bilkis Bano case involved this woman’s gang rape who carried a pregnant baby and death of fourteen family members including her three year old daughter. This culminated into criminal conviction of eleven perpetrators, which included police officers who participated as well. Bilkis …
APPELLANTS: Satvinder Singh Saluja and Others RESPONDENT: State of Bihar BENCH/JUDGE: K Joseph and A Bhushan DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 01 /07/2019 LEGAL PROVISIONS: Constitution of India, Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016, Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. INTRODUCTION The case is an appeal filed by the appellants (accused), before the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India against the Patna …
CASE COMMENTARY SATVINDER SINGH SALUJA AND OTHERS V STATE OF BIHAR, AIR (2019) 7 SCC 89 Read More »
INTRODUCTION: Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun is a landmark decided by the Supreme Court of India on the interpretation of Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA) and what it means for the right to inherit and legitimacy of children born from void or voidable marriages.Importance: This case is important because it addresses the rights of …
Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1087 Read More »
2024 SCC OnLine SC 805 The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Judges: Hon’ble Dr. Dhanajaya, Y Chandrachud (CJI), Manoj Misra. INTRODUCTION The taller, heavier and the larger wingspan bird had the poor eyesight as compared to other bird species. The unique variety of the bird species are to be endangered with the environment. In the …
Date of the judgment: February 24, 2023 Citation: Writ petition (civil) No. 172/2023 Petitioner: Adv. Vishal Tiwari, AOR. Abhigya Kushwaha, Adv. Sunita Yadav, Adv. Shailendra Mani Tripathi, Adv. Rahul Kumar, Adv. Manisha, Adv. Upendra Mani Tripathi, Adv. Aakar Shrivastav, Adv. Abhishek Jaiswal, Adv. Rajvardhan Singh. Respondent: Union of India and Ors. Bench: Hon’ble Chief Justice …
CASE COMMENT: Shailendra Mani Tripathi v. Union of India and Ors. Read More »
INTRODUCTION A stringent course of action curtails the liberty of a person, Arrest is no way exception to that. The notion of Bail is the quintessence of this case. The case was approached to the Supreme Court via Special Leave Petition. One of the spotlit in this case was the Guidelines issued for Investigation team …
SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL Vs CBI AND ANR:ANALYZING THE JUDICIAL PANORAMA OF BAIL IN INDIA Read More »
Decided on– April 27,2021 Appellant- Patan Jaman Vali Respondent– The state of Andhra Pradesh Coram– D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah Facts– The appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment by Sessions Court under section 3(2) (v) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and section 376 (1) of IPC as well as …
Civil Appeal Case No.- 5858 of 2015 Appellant- Rohit Choudhary & ANR Respondent- Vipul Ltd. Judges- Hon’ble Judges Aarvind Kumar and S. Ravindra Bhat Order Date- 06/09/2023 Facts Issues Raised Contention Appellant’s Contention The Appellants were represented by Learned Counsel Shri Digendra Sharma, Niharika Dubey, Mr. Anubhav Bhandari, and Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh. The Counsel …
CASE COMMENT ROHIT CHOUDHARY & ANR. V. M/S. VIPUL LTD. Read More »
Bench- Chief Justice of India (the then CJI) Ranjan Gogoi and members Justices Rohinton Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra Background of the Case The Sabarimala Temple in Kerala, dedicated to Lord Ayyappa, has traditionally barred women between the ages of 10 and 50 from entering, based on the belief that menstruating women are …
INTRODUCTION Marriage, a sacred institution, is a public declaration of love, loyalty and partnership. This comes with obligations and entitlements, which the partners have established. Law is very significant in marriage because it is a social institution and society and law are getting to know each other better. India has extremely complex and diverse laws …
Case Number: WP (C) 906/2016 Petitioners: Vivek Narayan Sharma Respondent: Union of India FACTS On November 8, 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a startling announcement that shook the nation: Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes, which made up Rs. 15.44 lakh crore or 86.9% of the total currency in circulation, were declared invalid and would …
CASE DETAILS Case Name: Vivek Narayan Sharma v Union of India Read More »
– Riya Tewatia CITATION : Pankaj Bansal vs. Union of India, 2023 SCC Online SC 1200 BENCH : Justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar JUDGEMENT : October 3, 2023 Introduction The case of Pankaj Bansal vs. Union of India (Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India, 2023) revolves around the arrest of Pankaj Bansal and …
Petitioner: Travancore Devasom Board Respondents: Ayappa Spices & Ors Citation: [2024] 3 S.C.R. 363 2024 INSC 183 The case was first filed in the Kerala High Court, then an appeal was submitted in the Honourable Supreme Court. It deals with the issues of procurement of cardamom and quality control. Cardamom is used to prepare Aravana …
CASE COMMENT Travancore Devasom Board vs Ayyappa Spices & Ors Read More »
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTRODUCTION: Transitory anticipatory bail is incorporated as a safeguard under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, despite the latter’s main focus being centred upon the granting of mere “anticipatory bail,” a rather expansive form of protection. Prior to 1973, courts determined judgments about the granting of anticipatory bail as …
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Priya Indoria v/s State of Karnataka Read More »
(Civil Appeal No 5802 of 2022) (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 12612 of 2022) FACTS: In the pertaining matter, the appellant, a 25-year-old woman from Manipur and a graduate with a BA degree residing in Delhi, comes from a farming background and is the eldest of five siblings. The current issue involves …
X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare, Govt of NCT Delhi Read More »
(Writ Petition (Civil) no. 55 of 2019) 2022 SCC Online SC 1540 FACTS The case challenged the validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment. The Constitution 103rd Amendment Act of 2019 was passed by the Parliament of India on 9th January 2019. The act allowed for 10% reservation in higher educational institutions and initial recruitment in …
Facts: In 1973, the third central pay commission introduced by the Indira Gandhi-led government aimed to standardize pensions for civilians and retired army personnel. This decision significantly impacted ex-servicemen’s pension scales, creating disparities. The “One Rank, One Pension” (OROP) scheme emerged as a demand for uniform pensions across retired armed forces personnel, irrespective of retirement …
VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. …RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 634 OF 2021 AND WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 751 OF 2021 Bench: FACTS: “National Worker Welfare Trust” (NWWT) …
Civil Appeal No. 2679 of 2024 (2024) 3 SCC 563 Facts The appeal in the Honorable Supreme Court is by the appellant who seeked appointment in Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya Institute for the Physically Handicapped, referred to ahead as the ‘Institute’, as a primary school teacher. The appeal was brought to the court since the appellant …
Writ Petition (Civil) no. 55 of 2019 2022 SCC online SC 1540 Facts: On 14th January 2019, the Government of India amended Articles 15 & Article 16 of the Indian Constitution and added clauses 15(6) and 16(6). Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution give power to the state to make special provisions for socially …
On 10 February, 2020 AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 1036, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 225, (2020) 1 KER LT 810, (2020) 1 MAD LJ(CRI) 378, (2020) 4 SCALE 198 Facts: In the landmark case of Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India (2020), the constitutional validity of reservations and affirmative action policies for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and …
Citation- 2021 SCC Online SC 261 FACTS Timeline of Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs. Babita Puniya Case (2020)- 1992- Notification allowing women to Join SSC 2002- Babita Puniya Filed PIL for equal treatment in PC 2005- Circular by MoD to prolong women officers appointment terms 2006- Another notification was released which allowed female SSC officers …
CASE COMMENTARY LT. Col Nitisha v. Union of India Read More »
Introduction: Facts of the case: Issues Raised: Contentions: Arguments in favour: Arguments against: Additionally, they contend that the program offers corporate donors, who can now give indefinitely without revealing their identities, unfair power. Important Provisions Supreme Court’s Decision: Relevance In the field of Law: Establishes precedence for Campaign Finance Regulations: The ruling rendered by the …
Common Cause v. Union of India (Electoral Bonds Scheme) 2024 Read More »
AKA, THE GREAT INDIAN BUSTARD CASE FACTS: ISSUES RAISED: CONTENTION: Plaintiff’s Arguments: RATIONALE: DEFECTS OF LAW: INFERENCE: Anirudh VG MIT WPU
Introduction The Supreme Court of India rendered a landmark decision in the 2021 case of Amit Kumar v. Suman Beniwal, addressing the complexities of matrimonial conflicts and the legal structures designed to protect women’s rights inside marriage. This ruling provides significant new insights into the proper interpretation of the Domestic Violence Act of 2005 and …
FACTS: The appellant, a 25-year-old unmarried Manipur permanent resident, became pregnant after embarking on a consensual relationship. Because “her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage,” she wanted an abortion. She had a negative outlook on the stigma and harassment that come with being an unmarried single parent in society, particularly for …
FACTS Bibisidhika first filed a complaint in 2013 contesting the ruling of the high court about Mohd. Firoz Khan, her son, and Rakesh Chaudhary. The incident started when Firoz Khan and Rakesh Chaudhary went to a house to look for lodging for an unidentified individual However, when the victim’s mother refused to let Rakesh Chaudhary …
MOHAMMAD FIROZ VS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (2022) Read More »
Introduction In ancient Indian society, the attitude towards homosexuality was very liberal and tolerant. The idea of same-sex relations was viewed as something completely natural and these relations were practiced openly. There was no concept of ‘shame’ in homosexuality. From ancient texts like Ramayana and Mahabharata to sculptures observed in the temples of Khajuraho, there …
Supriyo Chakraborty & Anr. vs. Union of India 2022 Read More »
CASE NAME: SHANTI CONDUCTORS PVT LTD V ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. CITATION: [2019] 16 SCR 25 BENCH: HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. A. K. SIKRI, HON’BLE JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER PARTIES INVOLVED: FACTS: 1. Shanti Conductors (P) Ltd. (Appellant) The appellant is a Private Limited Company that is registered in Kokrajhar, …
CASE COMMENTARY SHANTI CONDUCTORS PVT LTD V ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. Read More »
CITATION: AIR (2019) 7 SCC 89 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 951 OF 2019 DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 01 /07/2019 APPELLANTS: Satvinder Singh Saluja and Others RESPONDENT: State Of Bihar BENCH/JUDGE: K. Joseph and A. Bhushan FACTS OF THE CASE: On June 25, 2016, the appellants including Satvinder Singh Saluja, were traveling from Giridih, Jharkhand to Patna, Bihar …
Satvinder Singh Saluja & Others V. State Of Bihar Read More »
Facts The Ayodhya case is a landmark case judged by the Supreme Court of India, delivered on November 9, 2019. The case was between M.Siddique(D) Thr Lrs v. Mahant Suresh Das & Ors which revolves around a 2.77 acre disputed land in Ayodhya, UP which is claimed by both Hindus and Muslims. The plaintiffs believed …
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3382-3383 OF 2019 2019 (14) SCC 1 FACTS: ISSUES: The issues that were raised in this court are as follows: CONTENTION Petitioner’s Argument It was urged by the appellant for the appointment of the Chief Mutawalli in a Wakif Mutawalli, Hamdard, based upon the 1948 Deed. According to the appellant, the rule …
Citation: (2021) 5 SCC 626 Date of Judgement: 2nd March 2021 Court: Supreme Court Case No: Criminal Appeal No. 1348 of 2012 Nature of Case: Criminal Appellant: Shivaji Chintappa Patil Respondent: State of Maharashtra Bench: Gavai, BR (J) FACTS: Jayshree, the dead wife, was married to the accused for nine years before to the incident …
FACTS The President of India on 5th and 6th August 2019 issued two Constitutional Orders under Article 370 (1) of the Constitution of which one declared all provisions of the Constitution including its amendments to be applicable to the State of Jammu and Kashmir subject to modifications to Article 367 and the other abrogated Article 370, respectively. …
CASE COMMENT- Haji Abdul Gani Khan and Another vs Union of India and Others, 2023 Read More »
Facts Issue Contentions Plaintiff’s Arguments: Defendant’s Arguments: Rationale In its ruling, the Supreme Court highlighted the voter’s right to be fully informed regarding the backgrounds of electoral candidates, emphasizing transparency as essential for making informed voting decisions. The court took into consideration two important sections of the Representation of People Act, 1951. Firstly; Section 8 …
Bhim Rao Baswanth Rao Patil v. K. Madan Mohan Rao & Ors, 2023 Read More »
DATE OF JUDGEMENT (HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT) (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 10th May ,2024 BENCH– Hon’ble Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Aravind Kumar. CASE NO. Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.15290 OF 2021 FACTS OF THE CASE The given case judgement revolves around the dispute between Shriram Chits (India) Limited (‘OP’/ ‘service provider’ used interchangeably, here as …
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: J. Prashant Kumar Mishra and J. B.R. Gavai Parties: Judgment Date: January 24, 2024 INTRODUCTION: In the case of Prakashchandra Joshi v. Kuntal Prakashchandra Joshi, the supreme court of India answered one of the most important legal questions relating to marital relations. This case involves Prakashchandra Joshi and Kuntal …
PRAKASHCHANDRA JOSHI V. KUNTAL PRAKASHCHANDRA JOSHI @ KUNTAL VISANJI SHAH Read More »
(Supreme Court in Curative Petition (C) No. 44 of 2023 with Arbitration Petition No. 25 of 2023) Citation: (2023) INSC 1066 FACTS Indo Unique Flame Ltd. secured an occupational offer from Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. (KPCL) in September 2015, and initiated a sub-contract with NN Global, which included a clause 9 for security deposit and a clause …
INTRODUCTION The case of Poonam Sharma v. Union of India stands as a significant judicial landmark in India’s reproductive rights discourse, particularly concerning the termination of pregnancies beyond the statutory limit set by the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Amendment Act, 2021 (hereafter, referred to as ‘the 2021 Act’). The Act is an amendment to …
This case deals with the Fundamental Right to Free Speech and Expression. As the case progresses we would came to know how intricate the simple looking Fundamental Rights are and how difficult it is to interpret them in today’s complex and ever changing social and political structure. Facts: In this case the 5 Judge Constitution …
Kaushal Kishore v. The State of Uttar Pradesh: Case Comment. Read More »
FACTS Application for intervention and impleadment were allowed. Three categories of petition around the three farm laws, them being Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020, Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020, Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020. One category of the petition challenged the constitutional …
1. FACTS Teesta Atul Setalvad, a distinguished human rights activist, has been instrumental in seeking justice for victims of the 2002 Gujarat riots. These riots, triggered by the Godhra train burning incident, resulted in widespread communal violence, leading to significant loss of life and property, predominantly affecting the Muslim community. Setalvad, through her NGO, Citizens …
CASE ANALYSIS: ANJU GARG & ANR. V DEEPAK KUMAR GARG (2022) DATE OF THE CASE: 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2022 APPELLANT: ANJU GARG & ANR. RESPONDENT: DEEPAK KUMAR GARG . BENCH/JUDGES: JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI AND DINESH MAHESHWARI LEGAL PROVISIONS: SECTION 125 OF CrPC, ARTICLE 15(3), ARTICLE 39 OF INDIAN CONSNTITUTION. INTRODUCTION The matrimonial disputes and ascertainment of the legal …
CASE COMMMENTARY ANJU GARG & ANR. V DEEPAK KUMAR GARG (2022) Read More »
BACKGROUND The civil appeal (No. 3148 of 2012) arose from a judgment by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack on 28.07.2010. The case began with Writ Petition (Civil) No. 5302 of 2009, which challenged two orders by the District Judge, Khurda, dated 19.02.2009 and 26.03.2009. These orders related to Execution Petition No. 17 of …
Citation – 2023 Lawsuit(SC) 948 Appellant – CPL Ashish Kumar Chauhan Respondent – Commanding Officer Bench – Dipankar Datta, S. Ravindra Bhat Facts: The appellant was a radar technician in the Indian Army force and was serving for the Operation Parakram on India-Pak border in the aftermath of Indian Parliament attack which took place on …
-Mahek Shah -UPES Facts: In this instance, the SEC’s knowledgeable lawyer, Mr. Joshi, acknowledged that the director had broken the constitution by failing to set aside a minimum of one-third of the seats in the municipal councils of Mapusa and Mormugao for women. He maintained that the directors have authority over the reservation issue, so …
The case of Anurag Soni v State of Chhattisgarh is a criminal appeal in the Supreme Court of India. The judgment was delivered by a two-judge bench consisting of L. Nageshwar Rao, J. and M.R. Shah, J. The case deals with addressing the complexities surrounding consent in sexual relationships, especially when promises of marriage are …
Citation-Special Leave to Petition (Crl.) No.2520 OF 2017 Court– Supreme Court of India Bench: Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Date of Judgement:19 April,2024 Parties: Appellant-Parteek Bansal Respondent- State of Rajasthan & Ors. Important provisions – Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482: Grants power to the High Court to quash any FIR’s or …
Title- PARTEEK BANSAL vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Read More »
Facts On December 22, 2009, Nitinbhai Patel, submitted a FIR on behalf of Ramanbhai and Shankarbhai, they lived in the US and UK, each, in their capacity as the power of attorney holder. The land came in question in which Ramanbhai and Shankarbhai had purchased from Bhikabhai and his spouse Bhikiben in 1975, it was …
Case comment Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya and Others v. The State of Gujarat Read More »
INTRODUCTION In Phulel Singh v. The State of Haryana, Criminal Appeal No. 396 of 2010, a three-judge Supreme Court bench made up of Justices B.R. Gavai, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, and Prashant Kumar Mishra rendered a decision on September 27, 2023, holding that the accused should be found not guilty because the prosecution was unable to …
PHULEL SINGH V. STATE OF HARYANA, (2023) 10 SCC 268 Read More »
Case name: Jarnail Singh and Ors. V Lachhmi Narain Gupta and Ors. Appellant: Jarnail Singh Respondent: Lachhmi Narain Gupta Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Indu Malhotra, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, R.F. Nariman, Kurian Joseph, Dipak Mishra Facts of the case: The present case Jarnail Singh v Lachhmi Narain Gupta is a consequence of series of …
Jarnail Singh and Ors. V Lachhmi Narain Gupta and Ors. Read More »
(2022) Citation Writ Petition (Cr.) No. 491/2022 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: • Hon’ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi • Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta • Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna Parties: Appellant: • Ms. Bilkis Yakub Rasool • Sr. Adv. Shadan Farasat, AOR • Mr. Shankar Narayanan, Adv. • Ms. Jahnavi Sindhu, Adv. • Ms. Shruti Narayan, Adv. Sr. Adv. Shobha Gupta Sr. Adv. Tushar Mehta Sr. …
Facts Issues Raised Is the practice of media recording oral statements made in court proceedings a lawful and constitutional one? Important Provision Article 19 (1)(A)- Guarantees Freedom of Speech & Expression Contention Petitioner: Respondent: Rationale The bench ruled that the Madras High Court’s oral remarks are not part of the official judicial record. It affirmed …
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA vs. MR. VIJAYA BHASKAR (2021) Read More »
INTRODUCTION: The City of McKinney, Texas, inadvertently caused irreparable damage to the home of Vicki Baker in the middle of a high-stakes standoff between law enforcement and an armed fugitive. Police Department of the City used tear gas to force the individual out in a prolonged standoff with the fugitive on July 25, 2020. Unfortunately, …
(15 February, 2024) Background and Facts: The case of Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India revolves around the fundamental issue of transparency in Indian democracy. When presenting Union Budget of 2017-18 Former Finance Minister (Arun Jaitley) stated that after 70 years of Independence, country has not evolved for the transparent method for funding …
Association of Democratic Reforms v. Union Of India Read More »
WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 59 OF 2013 Association of Old Settlers of Sikkim and Ors. …Appellant(s) Versus Union of India and Anr …
Association Of Old Settlers Of Sikkim vs Union Of India Read More »
CASE DETAILS Judgement Cause Title Charan Singh @Charanjith Singh V. State of Uttarakhand Case Number Criminal Appeal no 447 of 2012 Judgement Date 20th April 2023 Court Supreme Court of India Quorum Abhay S. Oka, Rajesh Bindal Author Rajesh Bindal Legal Provisions Involved Section 304B,498A, 201 of IPC Section 113A of IEA INTRODUCTION In India, …
CHARAN SINGH @CHARANJIT SINGH V. STATE OF UTTARAKAHND Read More »