Citation: Competition Appeal (AT) No. 1 of 2023 Decided on: 29th March 2023 Parties: Google LLC and Google India Private Limited (collectively, “Google”) filed a competition appeal [Competition Appeal (AT) No. 01 of 2023, New Delhi] to contest the ruling made by the Competition Commission of India (CCI), which determined that Google had violated the …
ABSTRACT: This research paper looks into the symbiotic relationship between cybersecurity and artificial intelligence in the ever-evolving landscape of technological advancements. With digitization, there are various challenges posed by cyber threats that highlight the vulnerabilities inherent in the AI systems. This paper emphasizes the need of improving cybersecurity measures to safeguard against the spectrum of …
DECODING THE DUEL: CYBER SECURITY V. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE DIGITAL ERA Read More »
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justices S.K. Kaul, Vikram Nath, AS Oka, JK Maheshwari and Sanjiv Khanna Judgement: May 1, 2023 Citation: Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan, 2023 SCC Online SC 544 FACTS OF THE CASE: The couple Ms. Shilpa Shailesh and Mr. Varun Sreenivasan tied knot on February 17, 2002, in Mumbai, following …
CASE COMMENT WRITING Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union of India& Ors. (2023) – By Tanya TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. FACTS 3. ISSUES RAISED 4. CONTENTION 5. RATIONALE 6. DEFECTS OF LAW 7. INFERENCE INTRODUCTION Case Title: BILKIS YAKUB RASOOL …PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS …RESPONDENTS Citation: WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.491 OF …
Bench: Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice K.M. Joseph Citation: Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors. W.P. (C) No.225 of 2018, Decided on: 14-12-2018 Petitioner: Manohar Lal Sharma (supported by other petitioners) Respondent: Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors. (Union of India and other government officials) Court: Supreme Court of India Judgment Date: December 14, 2018 FACTS OF CASE The Rafale Deal case, officially known …
Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors Read More »
PALAK DUNEJA DELHI METROPOLITAN EDUCATION ABSTRACT Energy law governs energy resource exploration, extraction, and distribution, whereas environmental law focuses on ecosystem protection, resource conservation, and pollution reduction. With the virtue of this Research Paper, I have focused on how Energy resource extraction and utilization can have serious environmental consequences, affecting air and water quality, biodiversity, …
Environmental Laws V. Energy Laws A Comparative Analysis with Conflicting Criteria Read More »
According to the special marriage act 1954, a marriage between two people may be solemnised when the following requirements are met at the time of the marriage: (a) neither party has an existing spouse who is still alive (b) neither party—- (i) is incapable of giving a legal consent to it due to mental incapacity …
Supriyo v. Union of India CASE : SAME SEX MARRIAGE Read More »
This case is a collection of significant cases that the Indian Supreme Court has heard in order to decide whether or not to grant those who identify as sexual or gender minorities in India the ability to marry and start a family. A five-judge Constitution Bench, which included 52 petitioners and considered 20 related petitions, …
CASE COMMENT: SUPRIYO CHAKRABORTY AND ANR. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA. Read More »
A contract that was entered regarding a tender gave rise to the dispute between the respondent state and the appellant. The matter was sent for arbitration on April 22, 1997, and the arbitrator ordered the four respondents to pay 18% pendente lite and future compound interest on the claims in January 1999. When the respondent …
M/s Larsen Aur Conditioning and Refrigeration Company V. Union of India Read More »
[2024 SCC OnLine SC 25]. Before B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ. Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 491 of 2022. Decided on January 8, 2024. Following the Godhra train burning incident, communal riots erupted in Gujarat, India, leading to heinous crimes, including the rape of Bilkis Yakub Rasool alias Bilkis Bano. Her family was massacred, including …
This case is concerned with an issue weather a child born out of void or voidable marriage shall be given right to property of their parents or not. This case deals with if an illegitimate child is qualified to inherit the tribal property under Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. And, whether the …
– Dr. Jacent Mpalyenkana In the context of women’s rights in relation to the legal principle of equality before the law, women are entitled to equal treatment and cannot have their constitutional rights restricted or denied based only on their gender, according to constitutional imperatives. Still, it is impossible to fairly assert parity when evaluating …
The petitioners in the present case are members of the LGBTQIA+ community and have claimed to face social, economic, and political marginalization merely on the basis of their gender identity and sexual orientation. The petitioners, Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dang, a same-sex couple who wanted the court to give legal recognition to their marriage, filed …
SUPRIYO @ SUPRIYA CHAKRABORTY & ANR. V UNION OF INDIA 2023 Read More »
A contract that was entered regarding a tender gave rise to the dispute between the respondent state and the appellant. The matter was sent for arbitration on April 22, 1997, and the arbitrator ordered the four respondents to pay 18% pendente lite and future compound interest on the claims in January 1999. When the respondent …
M/s Larsen Aur Conditioning and Refrigeration Company V. Union of India Read More »
The problem starts with a security advisory issued by the Civil Secretariat, Home Department, Government of Jammu and Kashmir, instructing them to shorten their stay and make safe arrangements for return. Schools and offices were also closed pending further orders. On August 4, 2019, internet, mobile connectivity, and landlines were turned off until further notice. …
Case Analysis of the case, Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India Read More »
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6325-6326 OF 2015 MRS. AKELLA LALITHA … APPELLANT (S) VERSUS SRI KONDA HANUMANTHA RAO & ANR. … RESPONDENT (S) Judge: J. Krishna Murari …
Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India, (2023)’ revolves around the decision of the Supreme Court of India, which sorted out the controversial legal issue of demonetization that had been raging in the country since November 2016. Case Title: Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: Writ Petition (Civil) …
PETITIONERS NAME Mukesh Kumar, RESPONDENT NAMES State Of Uttarakhand BENCH Justice L Nageswara Rao and Justice Hemant Gupta CASE NUMBER Civil Appeal 1226 Of 2020 CITATION AIR 2020 SC 992. In 2001 Uttarakhand was formed, since Uttarakhand did not have a reservation policy of its own the policy from other states were applied in this …
MUKESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER VS STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS. Read More »
Citation: (2022) 7 SCC 433. Case no.: Writ Petition (C) No. 682 of 2021. Court: Supreme Court of India. Date of Judgement: 11 May 2022. Bench: Hon’ble CJI N. V. Ramana, Justice Surya Kant, Justice Hima Kohli. Petitioner: S. G. Vombatkere. Respondent: Union of India. In a significant legal development, retired Army General S.G. Vombatkere, …
Citation: WP(C) No. 162 of 2023 In the given case, Hindenburg Research established by Nathan Anderson in 2017 is a scientific monetary research firm which examines equity, credit and derivatives. It has a history of tracking down corporate facades, crimes and putting down wagers against the organizations. The Hindenburg Report submitted on January 24, 2023 …
2022 SCC online SC 704 Firstly, the Right to life, Secondly, the Right to personal liberty. It states that everyone has the right to live irrespective of gender and cultural variations and everyone has the right to mention their liberty and share their thoughts and views in society. Issues raised: The very basic questions that arose were very …
Budhadev karmaskar Vs. State of West Bengal and ors. Read More »
DATE: 23 AUGUST 2022 BENCH: BV NAGARATHNA & UJJAL BHUYAN COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CASE TYPE: WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 491 OF 2022 PETITIONER: BILKIS YAKUB RASUL RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 8 JANUARY 2024 During the 2002 Gujarat riots, Bilkis Bano, who was pregnant at the time, endured a …
CASE COMMENT: BILKIS YAKUB RASOOL V. UNION OF INDIA Read More »
This case spins arounds the order for a 100% reservation in class 3 and class 4 posts related toteachers in Jharkhand which was passed by as a result of state legislation which would give acomplete amount of reservation to the locals of particular districts in Jharkhand, but only tothe people belonging to the community of …
Equivalent citations: AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 3717, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 676 Bench: M.R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer, Arun Mishra INTRODUCTION: This case revolves around the issue of providing equal rights to daughters as coparceners. Prior to the 2005 Amendment, Hindu Succession Act did not provide daughters the right to become coparceners. However in the year 2005, Section 6 …
Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma on 11 August, 2020 Read More »
DATE: 23 AUGUST 2022 BENCH: BV NAGARATHNA & UJJAL BHUYAN COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CASE TYPE: WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 491 OF 2022 PETITIONER: BILKIS YAKUB RASUL RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 8 JANUARY 2024 During the 2002 Gujarat riots, Bilkis Bano, who was pregnant at the time, endured a …
CASE COMMENT: BILKIS YAKUB RASOOL V. UNION OF INDIA Read More »
Equivalent Citation: (2022) 7 SCC 433 Case No.: Writ Petition (C) No. 682 of 2021 Date of the judgement: 11th May 2022 Bench: Chief Justice of India (CJI) N.V. Ramana, Justice Surya Kant, Justice Hima Kohli Section involved: Section 124A of the IPC, Article 19[1](a) of the Constitution of India Petitioner: S.G. Vombatkere Respondent: Union of India …
(Quashing of Rape Case) Mohd. Julfukar …….. Appellant(s) Versus The State of Uttarakhand and Another ..…. Respondent(s) Judge: Honorable Justice B.R. Gavai Dated: 9th January, 2024 (Judgement) This case basically aroused out of the impugned final judgment and the order passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital on 11th October, 2022. It challenges …
Mohd. Julfukar v. The State of Uttarakhand and Another Read More »
CITATION: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 906 of 2016, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1 COURT: The Supreme Court of India BENCH: Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice Abdul Nazeer, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, Justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice B.V. Nagarathna (Dissenting) PARTIES: Vivek Narayan Sharma (Petitioner) and Union of India (Respondent) DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 2nd January 2023 ISSUES RAISED: …
In this case, the Supreme Court of India held that unmarried women could obtain an abortion between 20-24 weeks of pregnancy due to a change in their marital circumstances. A 25-year-old woman appealed a Delhi High Court ruling that denied her request for an abortion during the 23rd week of her pregnancy to the Supreme …
Court: The Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal No. 1441 of 2022 Appellant: State of Jharkhand Respondent: Shailendra Kumar Rai Bench: Hon’ble Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Hon’ble Justice Hima Kohli Date Decided: 31st October, 2022 The respondent entered the deceased victim’s home in Narangi village on November 7, 2004, in the afternoon, and it was alleged that …
Issues Contentions of the Respondents Judgment of the Court The Supreme court upheld Delhi High Court, and the Trial Court’s decision to grant the Death penalty to the Remaining four convicts. Ram Singh, the fifth accused committed suicide in Tihar jail, while the sixth one being a minor granted three years in – a correction facility by …
Welfare Department & Ors. Bench: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, A. S. Bopanna, B. Pardiwala,Case No.: Civil Appeal No. 502 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 12612 of 2022)Appellant: Mrs. XRespondent: The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department & Ors.Appellant’s advocate: Dr Amit MishraCourt: Supreme court of IndiaJurisdiction: Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme …
X Vs. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Read More »
Case no: Criminal appeal no. 1669 of 2009 Citation: (2019) 3 JT 16, (2019) 2 RCR(Criminal) 298, (2019) 3 Supreme 417 Hon’ble Judges: Justice. Abdul Nazeer, Justice. B. R. Gavai, Justice. A. S. Bopanna, Justice. V. Ramasubramanian and justice. B. V. Nagarathna Bench: Division Bench Appellant: Neeraj dutta Respondent: State Legislations referred: In this instant case, Mr. Ravijit Singh, engaged …
Case: Neeraj dutta v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Read More »
Indo Unique Flame Ltd. (IUFL) had been allotted a tender by Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd.(KPCL) for the supply of coal through an open tender process. IUFL had entered into asubcontract with Global Mercantile Private Ltd. (GMPL) to supply coal. IUFL had providedKPCL with a guarantee of the performance of the contract. In turn, IUFL had …
N.N. Global Mercantile Ltd. v. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. Read More »
ISSUES RAISED: CONTENTION: By the Respondent: In its counter affidavit that was submitted in the top court, the Gujarat Government stated that the petitioners have not stated as to how they possess the locus to seek a writ petition to quash the order of remission passed by the respondent No. 1 with respect to the …
On December 14, 2016, the prosecutrix, aged 12yrs went out to obtain a guava but didn’t return for a long time which led her mother to venture out and search for her. Her search took her to the Accused Satish’s residence where she enquired the accused about the whereabouts of her daughter which the accused …
The judgement of Anuradha Bhasin Vs. Union of India is a landmark judgement by the Supreme court of India, which was pronounced on 10th January, 2020. The case formed its base in the place renowned as the “Paradise on Earth”, that is Jammu & Kashmir. The ruling was related to the suspension of internet and …
ANURADHA BHASIN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AIR 2020 SC 1308 Read More »
The procedure of selecting important members of the Election Commission of India has undergone a substantial transformation as a result of the historic ruling in the case of Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India, which was handed down by a Supreme Court Constitution Bench on March 2, 2023. The Chief Justice of India, the Leader …
ANOOP BARANWAL V. UNION OF INDIA [ELECTION COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS], (2023) Read More »
– The UPSC scheduled the Civil Services Examination (CSE) 2020 initially for May 31, 2020. This prestigious examination is a gateway for individuals aspiring to join the Indian Administrative Service, Indian Police Service, and other elite civil services. – Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the examination faced postponements and was eventually conducted on October 4, …
The case titled “Tata Consultancy Services Limited versus Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Others”is a significant legal milestone in the dynamically evolving Indian corporate legal jurisprudence. This High-stakes litigation deals with various issues concerning the corporate governance framework, of which the issue concerning the balance between the rights of majority shareholders and the protection of …
Legal Provision: National Commission for Safat Karamchari Act, 1993; the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013; The Employment of Manual Scavengers and Constructions of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993 Bench: S. Ravindra Bhat and Aravind Kumar, JJ. Citation: 2023/INSC/950 | MANU/SC/1183/2023 Counsels: For Petitioner ………………………………………………………….. Dr. …
Bench: Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice K.M. Joseph Citation: Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors. W.P. (C) No.225 of 2018, Decided on: 14-12-2018 Petitioner: Manohar Lal Sharma (supported by other petitioners) Respondent: Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors. (Union of India and other government officials) Court: Supreme Court of India Judgment Date: December 14, 2018 The Rafale Deal case, officially known as Manohar Lal …
Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors Read More »
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) had initially entered into a contract dated 20th December, 2005 with the Seven Hills Healthcare (p) lmt (SHCL) over a land in the village Marol, Andheri, Mumbai. Under the contract it was agreed that the SHCL would develop the land and build a 1500 beds hospital. The MCGM had …
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI Vs ABHILASH LAL Read More »
Bench:- In the Amazon v. Future Retail case, there were two key benches involved: (He ruled in favor of Amazon, staying the FRL-Reliance transaction and upholding the emergency arbitrator’s award.) (They overturned the single judge’s decision, allowing the FRL-Reliance transaction to proceed and declaring the emergency arbitrator’s award unenforceable.) Facts of the Case: In 2019, …
This case is a collection of significant cases that the Indian Supreme Court has heard in order to decide whether or not to grant those who identify as sexual or gender minorities in India the ability to marry and start a family. A five-judge Constitution Bench, which included 52 petitioners and considered 20 related petitions, …
SUPRIYO CHAKRABORTY AND ANR. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA. Read More »
Reservation is provided for the upliftment of the backward classes by achieving social justice. There is always a debate in society regarding the reservation provided for some sections of people and even in the constitution it spoke about the concept of equality and reservations for SC, ST, OBC, and EWS.In this case, Neil Aurelio Nunes …
Neil Aurelio Nunes and Ors v. Union of India and Ors (2021) Read More »
2. ISSUES RAISED The lifestyle of those in this industry was now a factor in the problem, in addition to the murder. To address the concerns, a panel on constitutional law was also established in 2011. Mr. Jayant Bhushan, senior attorney, Mr. Pradip Ghosh, etc. were on the panel. Among the problems are: 3. CONTENTIONS …
The criminal special leave petition filed by Paramvir Singh Saini brought attention toallegations of police torture during his arrest and detention in Punjab. Seeking to address thebroader issue of custodial violence and protect the rights of the accused, the petitioneradvocated for mandatory CCTV camera installations in all police stations and investigativeagencies. Responding to the gravity …
Court Supreme Court of India Judges Justice N.V. Ramana, Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Subhash Reddy Citation AIR 2020 SC 1308 Case No Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1031 of 2019 Case Type Writ Petition Petitioner Anuradha Bhasin and Ors. Respondent Union of India and Ors. FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED Issue 1: Whether the freedom of speech …
Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1118 of 2014 Court The Supreme Court of India Judges Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Abhay S. Oka, Vikram Nath, J.K. Maheshwari. Petitioner Ms. Shilpa Sailesh Respondent Mr. Varun Shrineevasan FACTS OF THE CASE ISSUES RAISED IN THE CASE: The key issues presented before the Hon’ble Bench for consideration were: CONTENTIONS …
Civil Appeal No. 1966-1967 of 2020 Appellant Chief Information Officer Respondent High Court of Gujarat and Another Jurisdiction Supreme Court of India Bench Justice R. Banumathi and Justice A.S Bopanna INTRODUCTION The case of Chief Information Officer v. High Court of Gujarat and Anrs. 2020, is considered to be a landmark case, where the Supreme …
Chief Information Officer v. High Court of Gujarat and Anrs., 2020 Read More »
BARRING THE STUDENT FROM APPEARING BOARD EXAM DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES IS VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 21 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION Case No W.P.(C) 584/2023 with CM APPLs. 2281/2023, 2282/202 Jurisdiction Delhi High Court Case decided on 17th January 2023 Judge Hon’ble Ms Justice MINI PUSHKARNA Petitioner Prabhanoor Singh Virdi through his father Karamjeet Singh …
MASTER PRABHNOOR SINGH VIRDI v. THE INDIAN SCHOOL & ANR. Read More »
CASE COMMENT: Supriyo V. Union of India DATE OF JUDGEMENT: October 17, 2023 PETITIONER: Supriyo a.k.a. Supriya Chakraborty, Abhay Dang, Parth Phiroze Mehrotra, Uday Raj Anand RESPONDENT: Union of India BENCH: CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice S.K. Kaul, Justice S.R. Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli, Justice P.S. Narasimha CITATIONS: W.P. (C) No. 1011/2022 Diary No. 36593/2022 The …
This appeal resulted from a dowry harassment case in which the plaintiff had filed a first information report under Sections 498A, 323, and 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, against her husband and his brother. The trial court had directed the appellants and the children to “give blood samples to a specified hospital for …
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: (2 Judges) Mr. J. UU Lalit, J. Vineet Saran Case Type: Criminal Original Jurisdiction Writ Petition no. 154 of 2020 Petitioner: Vinod Dua Respondent: Union of India & Ors. Cases Referred: Kedar Nath Singh vs State Of Bihar on 20 January, 1962 Daulat Ram v. State of Punjab, 1962 …
Case Citation: (2021) 5 SCC 292 Date of Judgement: 25th Feb, 2021 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: (3 Judges) Mr. J. UU Lalit, Mr. J. Indra Banerjee, Mr. J. K.M Joseph Case Type: Criminal Appellate Criminal Appeal no. 989 of 2007 Petitioner: Devilal and others Respondent: State of Madhya Pradesh Cases Referred: Hariram v. …
Case Name: Devilal and Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh Read More »
Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: (2021) 6 SCC 73 Petitioner: Vikas Kishanrao Gawali Respondent: State of Maharashtra Date of Judgement: 4th March 2021 Bench: AM Khanwilkar,Indu Malhotra and Ajay Rastogi, JJ. Facts of the case Facts of the case The writ petition was filed in furtherance of K. Krishna Murthy v. Union of India …
Vikas Kishanrao Gawali Vs The State of Maharashtra Read More »
Bench- Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M.M Sundresh Introduction The Supreme Court observed that there had been many judgements in the High Court favouring the accused regarding his groundless arrest and upholding the right as enshrined under Articles 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution, however, there were also many instances where the Trial …
Case Comment: Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation (2022) Read More »
-Case commentary INTRODUCTION On the 14th of August 2020, Advocate Mr. Prashant Bhushan faced the Supreme Court of India’s criminal contempt charges due to two tweets. The case gained widespread attention for the observations made by the Supreme Court. Mr. Bhushan was fined Re. 1, and failure to pay could have resulted in a three-month …
In Re Prashant Bhushan & Anr. (2020) (Contempt of Court Case) Read More »
Bench: Justice Hima Kohli and CJI D.Y.Chandrachud Case No.: Criminal Appeal No.1441 of 2022 Appellant: State of Jharkhand Respondent: Shailendra Kumar Rai @ Pandav Rai Appellant’s Advocate: Madhusmita Bora Court: Supreme Court of India Jurisdiction: Criminal appellate Judgment Date: 31 October, 2022 FACTS ISSUES RAISED Based on the arguments received on behalf of the parties, …
Case Details IntroductionIt is inherent responsibility of the national leaders to create a safe heaven for its citizens by enforcing a certain level of security, while simultaneously upholding the standard of freedom that the public has grown to expect. The case is a very landmark and important one, since it served the purpose of making …
CITATION :- W.P.(C) No. 1011/2022Diary No. 36593/2022 DATE OF JUDGMENT:- 17 October, 2023 COURT:- SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PETITIONERS:- SUPRIYO CHAKRABORTY, ABHAY DANG, PARTH PHIROZE MEHROTRA, UDAY RAJ ANAND RESPONDENT:- UNION OF INDIA BENCH:- D.Y.CHNDRACHUD CJI, S.K..KAUL J,S.R.BHAT J,HIMA KOHLI J, P.S.NARSIMHA J Facts The cases were filed by the LGBT Community …
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 576 OF 2013 DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 20/01/2014 RESPONDENT: THE STATE APPELLANT: SUNIL BENCH: JUSTICE V.K. JAIN FACTS OF THE CASE: On November 6th, 2009, Priyanka, the deceased, who was married to Ramesh Kumar and related to Sahib Singh, Raj Rani, Manju, Ravinder, and Sunil, was taken to Saroj Hospital & Heart …
TASK 2: SUNIL v. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI), 2014. Read More »
Bench: Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice S.V.N. Bhatti Appellant: State of Haryana Respondent: Dharamraj Citation: 2023 Latest Caselaw 682 SC Judgement Date: 29 August 2023 Case No: Crl.A. No.–002635-002635 / 2023 Facts In the case of the State of Haryana Vs. Dharamraj[1] the FIR was charged against the respondent on 31.07.2020 including Sections 147, 148, …