CASE NAME Devilal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Date of Judgement 25 February 2021 Bench J. UU Lalit. J. Indira Banerjee, J. KM Joseph Court Supreme Court of India Citation Criminal Appeal No. 989 of 2007 Case no Criminal Appeal No. 989 of 2007 Facts Issues Raised Contentions The appellant Devilal and his sons …
Court Name: The Supreme Court of India Jurisdiction: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Appeal Number: Criminal Appeal No. 1892 of 2022 arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 890 of 2022] Appellant: B.A. Umesh aka Umesh Reddy Respondent: Union of India Bench: CJI D Y Chandrachud, J. P.S Narasimha, J. S. Ravindra Bhat Date of Judgment: November 4, …
Bangalore’s Jack the Ripper: B.A. Umesh v/s Union of India Read More »
NAME OF CASE: Satvinder Singh Saluja and Others V State of Bihar[1] CITATION: AIR (2019) 7 SCC 89 DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 01 /07/2019 APPELLANTS: Satvinder Singh Saluja and Others RESPONDENT: State Of Bihar BENCH/JUDGE: K Joseph and A Bhushan LEGAL PROVISIONS: Constitution Of India, Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016, Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. …
Case commentary on Satvinder Singh Saluja and others v State of Bihar Read More »
Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. … Petitioners Versus Union of India … Respondent Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1011 of 2022 FACTUAL MATRIX On 14th November 2022, writ petitions were filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court by two same-sex couples (hereinafter referred to as “Petitioners”) seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriages in India. These petitions …
CITATION: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1011 of 2022 Date of Judgment: October 17, 2023 PETITIONERS: Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. Respondent: Union of India BENCH: CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, J. S.K. Kaul, J. Ravindra Bhat, J. Hima Kohli & J. P.S. Narasimha LEGAL PROVISIONS: Articles 14, 15, 19, 21, and 25 of the Indian Constitution, …
CASE: Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. Vs Union of India Read More »
COURT NAME: IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JURISDICTION: CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO: WRIT PETITION(criminal) no(s). 307 of 2020 APPELLANT: Kerala Union of Working Journalists RESPONDENT: Uttar Pradesh Government JUDGE/ BENCH: Former CJI N.V.Ramana, Justice A.S. Bopanna, Justice Surya Kant DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 28 April, 2021 SUBJECT MATTER: Habeas Corpus Petition STATUES/ CONSTITUTION INVOLVED: Indian …
KERALA UNION OF WORKING JOURNALISTS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS Read More »
Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL NO.2483 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.1048 of 2020) Date of Judgement: 15 October 2020 Petitioner: SATISH CHANDER AHUJA Respondent: SNEHA AHUJA Bench: Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy, M.R. Shah FACTS Important questions pertaining to Domestic violence were raised in the case Satish Chander Ahuja V. Sneha Ahuja AIR 2020, SC …
Satish Chander Ahuja V. Sneha Ahuja AIR 2020, SC 2483. Read More »
Citation – MANU/SC/1449/2022 By – Krish Vikram, 1st Year Law Student, Symbiosis Law School Pune FACTS In the current situation, the government of India approved the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019, which allowed 10% reservations to economically disadvantaged groups of society. It should also be highlighted that the constitution only allows for reservations based on …
CASE COMMENT – JANHIT ABHIYAN VS. UNION OF INDIA Read More »
Court: Supreme Court of India Judges: Justice D. Y. Chandrachud and Justice M. R. Shah Date of Final Judgment: 6th May 2021 Facts Issues Raised Should the media be restricted from reporting oral remarks made during judicial proceedings? Oral remarks made by the Madras High Court during the hearing. Madras High Court was not able …
The Chief Election Commissioner of India v. Mr. Vijayabhaskar Read More »
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 4634 OF 2014 VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY & ORS. …PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) Date of Judgement: 27th July 2022 ……J. (A.M. Khanwilkar) ……J. (Dinesh Maheshwari) ……J. (C.T. Ravikumar) Since the constitutionality of multiple PMLA sections was contested, there is no gainsaying that the ruling rendered by the SC …
OVERVIEW OF THE CASE Case Name B,K Pavitra v. Union Of India Civil Case No. 2368 of 2011 Appellant B.K Pavitra and Ors. Respondent The State of Karnataka and SC,ST Engineer’s welfare association and The Union Of India, Cases referred Indra Sawhney v. Union of India 1992M.Nagraj v. Union Of India 2006Jarnail Singh v. Lacchmi …
Equivalent Citation: (2020) 1 SCC 1 Date of Judgement: November 9, 2019. Court: Supreme Court. Case Number: 10866-10867 of 2010. Case Type: Civil Appeal. Petitioner: M Siddiq (deceased). Respondent: Mahant Suresh Das & Ors. Bench: Ranjan Gogoi, D.Y.Chandrachud, S.A.Bobde, S.A.Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan. Common Name: Ayodhya Land Dispute Case, Ram Janam Bhoomi Case Or Ram Mandir …
M SIDDIQ (D) THR LRS. VS MAHANT SURESH DAS & ORS. Read More »
DATE: March 2, 2023 PETITIONER: Anoop Baranwal RESPONDENT: Union of India BENCH: Justice K.M. Joseph (headed the bench), Justice Ajay Rastogi, Justice Aniruddha Bose, Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Justice C.T. Ravikumar. CASE NUMBER: WP(C) 104/2015 LEGAL PROVISIONS: The Constitution of India (fundamental rights, Article 324, Article 142 and Article 248) and the Election Commission (Conditions …
NAME Vinod Dua v. Union Of India CITATION WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.154 OF 2020 BENCH Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran PETITIONERS Vinod Dua RESPONDENTS UOI & Ors. FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED ARGUMENTS ADVANCED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER ARGUMENTS ADVANCED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS RATIONALE INFERENCE The Supreme Court issued the …
INTRODUCTION The case of “Ruchika Girhotra v. SPS Rathore” is a significant legal matter in India, officially cited as “Ruchika Girhotra v. SPS Rathore (2009) 5 SCC 539.” The parties involved in this case were Ruchika Girhotra, the victim, and SPS Rathore, the respondent. The judgment was delivered by a bench of the Supreme Court …
INTRODUCTION: Contempt of court is defined as deliberate disobedience of any order, judgement, or verdict issued by the court, as well as making derogatory words about any court that may harm its reputation. The courts have been granted the authority to punish individuals for contempt of court in order to guarantee that the rulings, orders, …
Case Commentary: Prashant Bhushan, In re (Contempt Matter), (2021) 3 SCC 160 Read More »
BENCH : CJI D.Y. Chandrachud , J. S.K. Kaul , J. Ravindra Bhat , J. HIMA KHOLI & J. P.S. Narasimha . CITATION : W.P.(C) No. 1011 /2022 Diary No. 36593/2022 . PETITIONERS : SUPRIYO CHAKRABORTY, ABHAY DANG, PARTH PHIROZE MEHROTRA, UDAY RAJ ANAND. RESPONDENT : UNION OF INDIA . FACTS OF THE CASE This …
Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. v Union of India Read More »
WP (CIVIL) NO.1031 OF 2019 AIR 2020 SC 1308 Facts : The Indian territory of Jammu and Kashmir, which borders Pakistan, has been the focus of an ongoing conflict between the two nations for many years. The territory had its own constitution, special status under Article 370[1]of the Indian Constitution, and property ownership by Indian …
FACTS This is the murder case of sex worker Shrimati Chhayai Rani Pal alias Buri (45) by accused Budhadev Karmaskar. The incident occurred on September 17, 1999, at around 9: pm. Inside a three-storey building on Jogen Duta Lane, Calcutta’s red-light district. Mrs Buri was a resident of the building.[1] This time, cases involving sex …
Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal and Others Read More »
Court – Supreme Court of India Citation- 2022 SCC Online SC 1494 Date of case: 23 Jan 2023 Case no : C.A No –000077-000077/ 2023 Bench: Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice PS Narshimha Petitioner’s advocate : Abhinav Shrivastava Respondent’s advocate: Aditya Sharma Judgement by : Honourable CJI . ABSTRACT FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUE RAISED …
CASE COMMENTARY ON K.C CINEMA V. STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR Read More »
Date of Judgement – 19 May, 2023 Bench – Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Prashant Kumar Mishra Petitioner – Mansi Khatri Respondent – Gaurav Khatri Case No.- Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1595 OF 2022 Facts of the case In the above mentioned case both the parties were married on 12.12.16 and then separated on 29.10.22 …
Citation: Criminal Appeal No(s). 135/2010 Bench/Judge: Justices L. Nageswara Rao, B.R.Gavai and A.S. Bopanna INTRODUCTION The important ruling on the rights of sex workers is Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal. discusses their profession’s respect and dignity in accordance with Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The Supreme Court issued guidelines in …
Court Supreme Court of India Citation 2022 SCC Online SC 1494 Date of the Case 31st October 2023 Bench Justice D.Y Chandrachud and Justice Hima Kohli Appellant The State of Jharkhand Respondent Shailendra Kumar Rai@ Pandav Rai FACTS OF THE CASE: The facts of the case indicate that the respondent was accused of raping a …
CASE COMMENTARY ON STATE OF JHARKHAND v. SHAILENDRA KUMAR RAI Read More »
INTRODUCTION The ongoing case Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab has become a contentious one concerning the death sentence. Following the adoption of the constitution, a number of legislative efforts addressing the practicality and legitimacy of the death sentence were introduced. The Criminal Procedure Code was modified in 1973 to need “special reasons” in order …
FAO (OS) (Comm)59/ 2023 and CM Nos 14793/ 2023 & 14794/ 2023 Facts On 20th December 2018, Tomorrow Sales Agency Pvt Ltd (TSA) had entered a ‘Bespoke funding agreement’ (BFA) to fund the arbitral proceedings of Anant K. Choudhary, Vivek Shula, SBS Transpole Logistics Private Limited and Pravin Chandra Rai(hereinafter ‘the claimants) against SBS and …
Tomorrow Sales Agency Pvt Ltd v SBS Holdings Inc. and Ors Read More »
For Appellant: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Jagia, Mr. Vikram Pooserla Mr. Aahana Madhyala, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Malvika Kalra, Mr. Pranav Sarthi Ms. Divya Datla Raju, Advocates. Bench J. Amaravati Bench Court National Company Law Tribunal, Amaravati Bench Case Number: CP(IB)/204/7/AMR/2019 Date Of Judgement: 12.02.2020 FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES …
CASE COMMENTARY ON KVR INDUSTRIES PVT LTD V. PP BAFNA VENTURES PVT LTD Read More »
Date of Judgment May 11, 2023, Petitioner’s Name Government of NCT of Delhi (National Capital Territory of Delhi) Respondent’s Name Union of India Citation 2023 SCC OnLine SC 606 Court Supreme Court of India Bench Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice PS Narasimha, Justice Hima Kohli, Justice Krishna Murari, Justice M.R. Shah Law Involved Article 239 …
CASE COMMENTARY ON GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. UNION OF INDIA (2023) Read More »
Facts The plaintiff, in this case, filed a suit against the appellant-defendant seeking for and pleading immediate declaration, order and permanent injunction to restrict the appellant-defendant from copying, using or enabling others to use its designs in which the appellant-defendant sought cancellation of the said registered designs. In a gist, the appellant-defendant wanted to seek …
Case Commentary of S.D. Containers v. Mold-Tek Packaging Ltd. Read More »
CITATION – 2022 SCC OnLine 1321 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 29 SEPTEMBER 2022 CASE NUMBER – Civil Appeal No. 5802 of 2022 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 12612 of 2022 JURISDICTION – Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India PETITIONER – Mrs. X RESPONDENT – The Principal Secretary, Health and Family …
Citation: 2021 SCC Online 19 Appeal: Criminal Appeal 1919 of 2010 Decided on: 12th January, 2021 Bench: N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant, Aniruddha Bose Brief Facts of the Case: Facts of the case: Proceedings: The accused approached the Supreme Court of India with an appeal to set aside the order of the High Court of Gujarat. …
Case Commentary on Anversinh @ Kiransinh Fatesinh ZALA.Vs. State of Gujarat Read More »
CITATION AIR SC 1501 DATE OF JUDGMENT 11th MAY 2023 CASE NUMBER Writ Petition (C) No. 493 of 2022 PETITIONER Subhash Desai RESPONDENT Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra & Ors. BENCH Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud (C.J), M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha JJ. FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED CONTENTION FROM BOTH THE PARTIES …
CASE COMMENT ON SUBHASH DESAI V. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNOR OF MAHARASHTRA & [1] ORS. Read More »
Date of Judgement April 26, 2023 Bench Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Justice Pankaj Mithal Advocates representing the Appellant’s side Ms. Swati Ghildiyal and Ms. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Advocates Advocates representing the Respondent’s side Rameshwar Prasad Goyal and Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocates BACKGROUND OF THE CASE: The respondents in the present case are those …
CASE COMMENTARY ON STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. V. DR. PA BHATT & ORS. (2023) Read More »
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.3543 of 2020 Facts: The case of Paramvir Singh Saini vs. Baljit Singh & Ors is a legal matter that revolves around the implementation of CCTV cameras, oversight committees, and directives issued by the Supreme Court in India. The …
Case No.: Criminal Appeal Nos. 17351736 Satbir Singh Case : Supreme Court Guidelines for trial in dowry death cases, (banerji, 2021) FACTS OF THE CASE The appellant was found guilty of violating sections 304-B and 306 of IPC by the trial Court in an order dated on 11.12.1997. Under section 304-B of IPC they were given 7 …
AIR (2019) 4 SCC 17 Introduction: Citation AIR (2019) 4 SCC 17 Date of Judgment 25 January, 2019 Court Supreme Court of India Petitioner Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. Respondent Union of India Facts: The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “Code”) is a comprehensive Bankruptcy law …
INTRODUCTION The case of Vikash Kumar v Union Public Services Commission & Ors (2021) is an important landmark case in the area of disability rights in India. The Supreme Court of India in its judgement held that a person who is suffering from Writer’s Cramp or dysgraphia, which has not been certified as a benchmark …
Vikash Kumar v. Union Public Service Commission & Ors. (2021) Read More »
Abstract This case relates to the two most heinous crimes, the first is rape and the other is murder. The victim in this case was raped and burnt by pouring kerosene on her body. Another significant issue involved was the controversial “two-finger test’’[1], which violates women’s right to privacy and has been denounced by courts …
State of Jharkhand vs Shailendra Kumar Rai@ Pandav Rai Read More »
This case is about CJI coming under the RTI Act. So, The Supreme Court of India was required by the Central Information Commission (CIC) to provide information about the Collegium’s decision-making process in November 2009. The CIC’s ruling concerns activist Subhash Chandra Agarwal’s request for information under the right to privacy. The CIC specifically mandated …
COURT: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LEGAL PROVISION: MTP,1971, RULE 3B OF THE MTPR,2003 BENCH: HON’BLE DR. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. LOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA PARTIES: X.…… …
X VS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVT OF NCT DELHI Read More »
Facts This case is concerned with an issue of importance with respect to the rights of animals (i,e., bulls) on the one hand while trying to preserve the culture and tradition of Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, and Karnataka on the other hand. This case majorly deals with the practice of ‘Jallikattu’, a sport conducted for entertainment …
Animal Welfare Board of India Vs. A. Nagaraja and others Read More »
FACTS In the given case, Bhopal Sugar Industries LTD. was the appellant whereas the Sales Tax Officer, Bhopal was the respondent. The suit was basically filed to collect sales tax from the appellate considering that the usage of the product by the appellate itself was a sale as the respondent appellate was considered to be …
BHOPAL SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. V SALES TAX OFFICER, BHOPAL Read More »
VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) [2020] 3 SCC 637. FACTS Background: On August 5, 2019, the Indian government revoked the special status granted to the state of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution of India. This decision was followed by a series of measures imposed by the government, including the suspension of …
Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 1441 of 2022 Date of the case: 31st October 2022 Bench :Hon’ ble Justice Dr. Chandrachud, Hon’ble Justice Ms. Kohli. Sections involved: IPC Sections – 300, 302, 307,375,376,448. CrPC sections – 173,174, Indian Evidence Act sections- 32(1), 60. Constitution of India – Article 136. Appellant: The State of Jharkhand Respondent: Shalendra …
Case: State of Jharkhand v. Shailendra Kumar Rai, 2022 SC 1441 Read More »
The main issue that was raised in the case was, whether the fundamental rights to freedom of religion of the Zoroastrian community under Article 25 of the constitution of India were violated because of the guidelines and protocol made by the union of India for covid-19 pandemic. The contentions of the appellants were that the …
ABSTRACT In the contemporary era, the global community grapples with diverse illnesses, and ongoing technological and methodological advancements contribute to the field of clinical medicine. Unfortunately, a significant number of individuals succumb to various causes, including suicide or the inability to access essential medical treatment. Within societal structures, the provision of palliative care and …
“THE FIGHT AGAINST EUTHANASIA AND IT’S LEGAL PERSPECTIVE” Read More »
AbstractBy hearing the word insane, we thought of a mentally disturbed person who is innocent as a child and cannot think like a normal person. If we talk about insanity in legal language, then it may differ. Yes, insanity is used as a defence in criminal liability. We use a word for insanity that is …
Legal Insanity and What’s the Difference Between Legal Insanity and Mental Insanity Read More »
Abstract This research delves into the escalating issue of drug abuse among juveniles in India, scrutinizing the multifaceted dimensions and exploring the evolving role of the judiciary. Grounded in the wisdom of leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Dr. APJ Kalam, who emphasized nurturing the future of the nation, the study unveils the disconcerting reality that …
Understanding the judicial response to juvenile drug abuse Read More »
ABSTRACT Marriage is an union between two individuals established through religious ceremonies, or legal contract which is recognised socially or ritually. In this modern era the definition of marriage has gone through various changes, historically the primary purpose behind performance of marriage was to procreation, transfer of property , and Maintenance of social order etc …
A Culture of Love: Examining Same-Sex Relationships in various aspects Read More »
Abstract India has been home to many refugees. India lacks clear domestic refugee laws, leaving lakhs of refugees in poverty without basic necessities. Absence of uniform laws and political considerations lead to potential discrimination. Ad hoc government measures offer minimal legal protection, especially for civil and political rights, and leave refugees vulnerable, lacking safety and …
Abstract Including ‘smart contracts’ in the legal frameworks of contracts in India could be an evolution of traditional contracts and transactions. This evolution can be in some areas of existing laws or a total advancement. Transactions and contracts are relevant at a global level at present times, especially when we are witnessing the legal integration …
Smart Contracts and the Indian Contract Act: Compatibility and Implications Read More »
Date of the case – 14 February 2011 Judgement of the case – May 2022 Appellant –Buddhadev karmaskar Respondent – State of West Bengal & ORS Bench / Judges – Markandey katju ,Gyan sudha misra Legal Provision – Constitution of India, Article 14, 19, 21, 142 IPC – section 302, CRPC –Section 164, 357C FACTS …
CASE : Buddhadev Karmaskar vs State of West Bengal Read More »
BENCH Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, Justice Krishna Murari PROCEDURAL HISTORY The appellant, in this case, had filed a suit in the Trial Court, for partition, claiming a one-fifth share in a certain property. Following the dismissal of the suit by the Trial Court, the appellant appealed at the High Court of Madras, under Section 96 …
Case Comment: Arunachala Gounder (dead) By Lrs v. Ponnusamy Read More »
Reportable- Supreme Court of India Under – Extra Ordinary Appellate JurisdictionCitation -Special Leave Petition (civil) No 12612 of 2022 Date of Judgment- Sept 29, 2022 Bench- Justice D.Y Chandrachud, Justice S. Bopanna, Justice B. Pardiwala. Parties- X V/s (Petitioner) , Principal Secretary Health And Family welfare, Govt of NTC Delhi (Respondent) Introduction In …
Case- X v/s Principal Secretary Health And Family welfare, Government of NTC Delhi. Read More »
Bench: Justice Hima Kohli and CJI D.Y.Chandrachud Case No.: Criminal Appeal No.1441 of 2022 Appellant: State of Jharkhand Respondent: Shailendra Kumar Rai Appellant’s Advocate: Madhusmita Bora Court: Supreme Court of India Judgment Date: 31 October 2022 Facts of the case The fact of the case of the prosecution is that the respondent entered the house …
DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 2nd March, 2023. PETITIONER: Anoop Baranwal RESPONDENT: Union of India BENCH: Honourable Justices K.M. Joseph, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy, C.T. Ravikumar LEGAL PROVISIONS: The Constitution of India CITATION: W.P.(C) 114/2015 FACTS Several Public Interest Litigations (PIL) were filed in the Supreme Court to review the manner of appointment of the …
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.1849 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.5191 OF 2021 FACTS ISSUES RAISED: The Supreme Court made it clear that the twin bail conditions stipulated by Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering (PMLA) Act were invalid in the present case. In addition, the Apex Court established rules for the granting of bail …
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation Read More »
Court Name:- The Supreme Court Of India Jurisdiction:- Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appeal Number:- Civil Appeal No 5802 of 2022(Arising out of SLP (C) No 12612 of 2022) Petitioner:- X Respondent [s]:-The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr Bench:-Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud J.,A S Bopanna J.,J B Pardiwala …
NAME OF THE CASE Pawan Kumar Gupta vs. State of NCT of Delhi[1] CITATION (2020) 03 SC CK 0075 SLP(Criminal) No. 547 of 2020 [Arising out of SLP(Crl.) D No. 2122 of 2020] APPELLANT Pawan Kumar Gupta RESPONDENT State of NCT of Delhi DATE OF JUDGEMENT 20 January 2020 BENCH/ JUDGE R. Banumathi, Ashok …
PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA V. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Read More »
Case Comment Citation Writ Petition (Civil) No. 607 of 2021(1) Date of Judgement 2nd May 2022 Petitioner’s Name Jacob Puliyel Respondent’s Name Union of India & Ors Court Supreme Court of India (Civil Original Jurisdiction) Bench Justice L. Nageswara Rao & Justice B.R Gavai Important Section/Article of Law Article 21 of the Constitution of India …
Date Of Judgement: 28/04/2023 APPELLANTS : Karnataka power transmission corporation LTD & Ors. RESPONDENT : Sri B.G Manamohana Priyanka &Ors BENCH/JUDGE : M.R. Shah, J.B. Pardiwala Legal Provisions:Labour Law , Constitution of India Civil Appeal No :2702 OF 2023 Facts Here writ petitioners – respondents were appointed as assistant executive engineer in the appellant corporation …
DATE OF JUDGEMENT: September 13,2023 APPELLANT: Javed Shaukat Ali Qureshi RESPONDENT: The State of Gujarat BENCH: Hon’ble Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon’ble Justice Sanjay Karol CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1012 OF 2022 FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED One of those who was found guilty (appellant) appealed the conviction before the Supreme Court, challenging the …
Case: Javed Shaukat Ali Qureshi vs The State Of Gujarat Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE In the legal matter of Balram Garg v. Securities and Exchange Board of India[1] (SEBI), the litigation centred on allegations of insider trading[2] within the intricate framework of the Indian securities market. Central to this legal dispute were the pivotal figures of the Chairman and the Managing Director, holding positions of …
Citation: Writ Petition Civil No.576 of 2016 Date of Judgement: 17th January 2019 Name of Appellate: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (AHAR) Name of Respondent: The State of Maharashtra and Ors. Bench: Justice A. K. Sikri and Justice A. Bhushan Legal Provisions: Article 14, 15, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), 21; Section 2(8)(i), 6(4), 8(1), 8(4) of the …
Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association & Anr. V. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Read More »
(Criminal appeal no.98 of 2021) [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 11616 of 2019] Facts: an unlawful act against a Professor in Kerala following the objectionable questions framed by him in B. Com examination. He was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2015 since he was a member of Popular Front of India, a fundamentalist group under UAPA (Unlawful …