Case Comment

Case no: Criminal appeal no. 1669 of 2009 Citation: (2019) 3 JT 16, (2019) 2 RCR(Criminal) 298, (2019) 3 Supreme 417 Hon’ble Judges: Justice. Abdul Nazeer, Justice. B. R. Gavai, Justice. A. S. Bopanna, Justice. V. Ramasubramanian and justice. B. V. Nagarathna Bench: Division Bench Appellant: Neeraj dutta Respondent: State Legislations referred:  In this instant case, Mr. Ravijit Singh, engaged …

Case: Neeraj dutta v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Read More »

Indo Unique Flame Ltd. (IUFL) had been allotted a tender by Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd.(KPCL) for the supply of coal through an open tender process. IUFL had entered into asubcontract with Global Mercantile Private Ltd. (GMPL) to supply coal. IUFL had providedKPCL with a guarantee of the performance of the contract. In turn, IUFL had …

N.N. Global Mercantile Ltd. v. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. Read More »

ISSUES RAISED:  CONTENTION:  By the Respondent: In its counter affidavit that was submitted in the top court, the Gujarat Government stated that the petitioners have not stated as to how they possess the locus to seek a writ petition to quash the order of remission passed by the respondent No. 1 with respect to the …

Bilkis Yakoob Rasool v. Union of India  Read More »

On December 14, 2016, the prosecutrix, aged 12yrs went out to obtain a guava but didn’t return for a long time which led her mother to venture out and search for her. Her search took her to the Accused Satish’s residence where she enquired the accused about the whereabouts of her daughter which the accused …

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIA VS SATISH RAGDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1410 OF 2021 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NO. 925 OF 2021) Read More »

The judgement of Anuradha Bhasin Vs. Union of India is a landmark judgement by the Supreme court of India, which was pronounced on 10th January, 2020. The case formed its base in the place renowned as the “Paradise on Earth”, that is Jammu & Kashmir. The ruling was related to the suspension of internet and …

ANURADHA BHASIN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AIR 2020 SC 1308 Read More »

The procedure of selecting important members of the Election Commission of India has undergone a substantial transformation as a result of the historic ruling in the case of Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India, which was handed down by a Supreme Court Constitution Bench on March 2, 2023. The Chief Justice of India, the Leader …

ANOOP BARANWAL V. UNION OF INDIA [ELECTION COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS], (2023)  Read More »

– The UPSC scheduled the Civil Services Examination (CSE) 2020 initially for May 31, 2020. This prestigious examination is a gateway for individuals aspiring to join the Indian Administrative Service, Indian Police Service, and other elite civil services.    – Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the examination faced postponements and was eventually conducted on October 4, …

Rachana vs Union of India,2021 Read More »

The case titled “Tata Consultancy Services Limited versus Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Others”is a significant legal milestone in the dynamically evolving Indian corporate legal jurisprudence. This High-stakes litigation deals with various issues concerning the corporate governance framework, of which the issue concerning the balance between the rights of majority shareholders and the protection of …

TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. V. CYRUS INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. (2021) – (CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 440-441 of 2020) Read More »

Legal Provision: National Commission for Safat Karamchari Act, 1993; the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013; The Employment of Manual Scavengers and Constructions of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993  Bench: S. Ravindra Bhat and Aravind Kumar, JJ. Citation: 2023/INSC/950    |    MANU/SC/1183/2023 Counsels:  For Petitioner     ………………………………………………………….. Dr. …

COURT: In the Supreme Court of India Read More »

Bench: Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice K.M. Joseph Citation: Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors. W.P. (C) No.225 of 2018, Decided on: 14-12-2018 Petitioner: Manohar Lal Sharma (supported by other petitioners) Respondent: Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors. (Union of India and other government officials) Court: Supreme Court of India Judgment Date: December 14, 2018 The Rafale Deal case, officially known as Manohar Lal …

Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors Read More »

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) had initially entered into a contract dated 20th December, 2005 with the Seven Hills Healthcare (p) lmt (SHCL) over a land in the village Marol, Andheri, Mumbai. Under the contract it was agreed that the SHCL would develop the land and build a 1500 beds hospital. The MCGM had …

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI Vs ABHILASH LAL Read More »

Bench:- In the Amazon v. Future Retail case, there were two key benches involved:  (He ruled in favor of Amazon, staying the FRL-Reliance transaction and upholding the emergency arbitrator’s award.) (They overturned the single judge’s decision, allowing the FRL-Reliance transaction to proceed and declaring the emergency arbitrator’s award unenforceable.) Facts of the Case: In 2019, …

Amazon v. Future Retail Read More »

This case is a collection of significant cases that the Indian Supreme Court has heard in order to decide whether or not to grant those who identify as sexual or gender minorities in India the ability to marry and start a family. A five-judge Constitution Bench, which included 52 petitioners and considered 20 related petitions, …

 SUPRIYO CHAKRABORTY AND ANR. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA. Read More »

Reservation is provided for the upliftment of the backward classes by achieving social justice. There is always a debate in society regarding the reservation provided for some sections of people and even in the constitution it spoke about the concept of equality and reservations for SC, ST, OBC, and EWS.In this case, Neil Aurelio Nunes …

Neil Aurelio Nunes and Ors v. Union of India and Ors (2021) Read More »

2. ISSUES RAISED  The lifestyle of those in this industry was now a factor in the problem, in addition to the murder. To address the concerns, a panel on constitutional law was also established in 2011. Mr. Jayant Bhushan, senior attorney, Mr. Pradip Ghosh, etc. were on the panel. Among the problems are: 3. CONTENTIONS …

Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal Read More »

The criminal special leave petition filed by Paramvir Singh Saini brought attention toallegations of police torture during his arrest and detention in Punjab. Seeking to address thebroader issue of custodial violence and protect the rights of the accused, the petitioneradvocated for mandatory CCTV camera installations in all police stations and investigativeagencies. Responding to the gravity …

PARAMVIR SINGH SAINI V. BALJIT SINGH, 2020 Read More »

Court Supreme Court of India Judges  Justice N.V. Ramana, Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Subhash Reddy Citation AIR 2020 SC 1308 Case No Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1031 of 2019 Case Type Writ Petition Petitioner Anuradha Bhasin and Ors. Respondent Union of India and Ors. FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED Issue 1: Whether the freedom of speech …

ANURADHA BHASIN V. UNION OF INDIA Read More »

Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1118 of 2014 Court The Supreme Court of India Judges Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Abhay S. Oka, Vikram Nath, J.K. Maheshwari.  Petitioner  Ms. Shilpa Sailesh  Respondent Mr. Varun Shrineevasan FACTS OF THE CASE  ISSUES RAISED IN THE CASE: The key issues presented before the Hon’ble Bench for consideration were:  CONTENTIONS …

SHILPA SAILESH v. VARUN SHRINEEVASAN (2023) Read More »

Civil Appeal No.  1966-1967 of 2020 Appellant  Chief Information Officer Respondent High Court of Gujarat and Another Jurisdiction Supreme Court of India Bench  Justice R. Banumathi and Justice A.S Bopanna INTRODUCTION The case of Chief Information Officer v. High Court of Gujarat and Anrs. 2020, is considered to be a landmark case, where the Supreme …

Chief Information Officer v. High Court of Gujarat and Anrs., 2020 Read More »

BARRING THE STUDENT FROM APPEARING BOARD EXAM DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES IS VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 21 OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION Case No W.P.(C) 584/2023 with CM APPLs. 2281/2023, 2282/202 Jurisdiction Delhi High Court Case decided on 17th January 2023 Judge Hon’ble Ms Justice MINI PUSHKARNA Petitioner Prabhanoor Singh Virdi through his father Karamjeet Singh …

MASTER PRABHNOOR SINGH VIRDI v. THE INDIAN SCHOOL & ANR. Read More »

CASE COMMENT: Supriyo V. Union of India  DATE OF JUDGEMENT: October 17, 2023 PETITIONER: Supriyo a.k.a. Supriya Chakraborty, Abhay Dang, Parth Phiroze Mehrotra, Uday Raj Anand  RESPONDENT: Union of India BENCH: CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice S.K. Kaul, Justice S.R. Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli, Justice P.S. Narasimha  CITATIONS: W.P. (C) No. 1011/2022 Diary No. 36593/2022 The …

CASE COMMENT: Supriyo V. Union of India Read More »

This appeal resulted from a dowry harassment case in which the plaintiff had filed a first information report under Sections 498A, 323, and 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, against her husband and his brother. The trial court had directed the appellants and the children to “give blood samples to a specified hospital for …

Inayath Ali & Anr. Vs State of Telangana & Anr Read More »

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: (2 Judges) Mr. J. UU Lalit, J. Vineet Saran  Case Type: Criminal Original Jurisdiction Writ Petition no. 154 of 2020  Petitioner: Vinod Dua Respondent: Union of India & Ors. Cases Referred: Kedar Nath Singh vs State Of Bihar on 20 January, 1962 Daulat Ram v. State of Punjab, 1962 …

Date of Judgement: June 03,2021 Read More »

Case Citation: (2021) 5 SCC 292 Date of Judgement: 25th Feb, 2021 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: (3 Judges) Mr. J. UU Lalit, Mr. J. Indra Banerjee, Mr. J. K.M Joseph Case Type: Criminal Appellate  Criminal Appeal no. 989 of 2007 Petitioner: Devilal and others Respondent: State of Madhya Pradesh Cases Referred: Hariram v. …

Case Name: Devilal and Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh Read More »

Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: (2021) 6 SCC 73 Petitioner: Vikas Kishanrao Gawali Respondent: State of Maharashtra Date of Judgement: 4th March 2021 Bench: AM Khanwilkar,Indu Malhotra and Ajay Rastogi, JJ. Facts of the case Facts of the case The writ petition was filed in furtherance of  K. Krishna Murthy v. Union of India …

Vikas Kishanrao Gawali Vs The State of Maharashtra Read More »

Bench- Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M.M Sundresh Introduction The Supreme Court observed that there had been many judgements in the High Court favouring the accused regarding his groundless arrest and upholding the right as enshrined under Articles 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution, however, there were also many instances where the Trial …

Case Comment: Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation (2022) Read More »

-Case commentary INTRODUCTION On the 14th of August 2020, Advocate Mr. Prashant Bhushan faced the Supreme Court of India’s criminal contempt charges due to two tweets. The case gained widespread attention for the observations made by the Supreme Court. Mr. Bhushan was fined Re. 1, and failure to pay could have resulted in a three-month …

In Re Prashant Bhushan & Anr. (2020) (Contempt of Court Case) Read More »

Bench: Justice Hima Kohli and CJI D.Y.Chandrachud Case No.: Criminal Appeal No.1441 of 2022 Appellant: State of Jharkhand Respondent: Shailendra Kumar Rai @ Pandav Rai Appellant’s Advocate: Madhusmita Bora Court: Supreme Court of India Jurisdiction: Criminal appellate Judgment Date: 31 October, 2022 FACTS ISSUES RAISED Based on the arguments received on behalf of the parties, …

The State Of Jharkhand V/S Shailendra Kumar Rai Read More »

Case Details IntroductionIt is inherent responsibility of the national leaders to create a safe heaven for its citizens by enforcing a certain level of security, while simultaneously upholding the standard of freedom that the public has grown to expect. The case is a very landmark and important one, since it served the purpose of making …

Case Comment: Anuradha Bhasin V. Union of India Read More »

CITATION :-                                               W.P.(C) No. 1011/2022Diary No. 36593/2022 DATE OF JUDGMENT:-                                                                    17 October, 2023 COURT:-                                                                         SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PETITIONERS:-      SUPRIYO CHAKRABORTY, ABHAY DANG, PARTH PHIROZE                                         MEHROTRA, UDAY RAJ ANAND RESPONDENT:-                                                                                     UNION OF INDIA BENCH:-       D.Y.CHNDRACHUD CJI, S.K..KAUL J,S.R.BHAT J,HIMA KOHLI J,   P.S.NARSIMHA  J Facts The cases were filed by the LGBT Community …

CASE COMMENT Read More »

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 576 OF 2013 DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 20/01/2014 RESPONDENT:  THE STATE APPELLANT: SUNIL BENCH:  JUSTICE V.K. JAIN FACTS OF THE CASE: On November 6th, 2009, Priyanka, the deceased, who was married to Ramesh Kumar and related to Sahib Singh, Raj Rani, Manju, Ravinder, and Sunil, was taken to Saroj Hospital & Heart …

TASK 2: SUNIL v. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI), 2014. Read More »

Bench: Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice S.V.N. Bhatti Appellant: State of Haryana Respondent: Dharamraj Citation: 2023 Latest Caselaw 682 SC Judgement Date: 29 August 2023 Case No: Crl.A. No.–002635-002635 / 2023 Facts In the case of the State of Haryana Vs. Dharamraj[1] the FIR was charged against the respondent on 31.07.2020 including Sections 147, 148, …

STATE OF HARYANA V. DHRAMRAJ Read More »

CASE NAME Devilal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Date of Judgement 25 February 2021 Bench J. UU Lalit. J. Indira Banerjee, J. KM Joseph Court Supreme Court of India Citation Criminal Appeal No. 989 of 2007   Case no Criminal Appeal No. 989 of 2007 Facts Issues Raised Contentions The appellant Devilal and his sons …

Devilal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Read More »

CITATION: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1011 of 2022 Date of Judgment: October 17, 2023 PETITIONERS: Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. Respondent: Union of India BENCH: CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, J. S.K. Kaul, J. Ravindra Bhat, J. Hima Kohli & J. P.S. Narasimha LEGAL PROVISIONS: Articles 14, 15, 19, 21, and 25 of the Indian Constitution, …

CASE: Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. Vs Union of India Read More »

COURT NAME:  IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JURISDICTION:  CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO:   WRIT PETITION(criminal) no(s). 307 of 2020 APPELLANT:   Kerala Union of Working Journalists RESPONDENT:   Uttar Pradesh Government JUDGE/ BENCH:   Former CJI N.V.Ramana, Justice A.S. Bopanna, Justice Surya Kant DATE OF JUDGEMENT:   28 April, 2021 SUBJECT MATTER:   Habeas Corpus Petition STATUES/ CONSTITUTION INVOLVED:   Indian …

 KERALA UNION OF WORKING JOURNALISTS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS Read More »

Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL NO.2483 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.1048 of 2020) Date of Judgement: 15 October 2020 Petitioner: SATISH CHANDER AHUJA Respondent: SNEHA AHUJA Bench: Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy, M.R. Shah FACTS Important questions pertaining to Domestic violence were raised in the case Satish Chander Ahuja V. Sneha Ahuja AIR 2020, SC …

Satish Chander Ahuja V. Sneha Ahuja AIR 2020, SC 2483. Read More »

Citation – MANU/SC/1449/2022 By – Krish Vikram, 1st Year Law Student, Symbiosis Law School Pune FACTS In the current situation, the government of India approved the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019, which allowed 10% reservations to economically disadvantaged groups of society. It should also be highlighted that the constitution only allows for reservations based on …

CASE COMMENT – JANHIT ABHIYAN VS. UNION OF INDIA Read More »

Court: Supreme Court of India                                                          Judges: Justice D. Y. Chandrachud and Justice M. R. Shah Date of Final Judgment: 6th May 2021 Facts Issues Raised Should the media be restricted from reporting oral remarks made during judicial proceedings? Oral remarks made by the Madras High Court during the hearing. Madras High Court was not able …

The Chief Election Commissioner of India v. Mr. Vijayabhaskar Read More »

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 4634 OF 2014 VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARY & ORS. …PETITIONER(S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) Date of Judgement: 27th July 2022                            ……J. (A.M. Khanwilkar) ……J. (Dinesh Maheshwari) ……J. (C.T. Ravikumar) Since the constitutionality of multiple PMLA sections was contested, there is no gainsaying that the ruling rendered by the SC …

VIJAY MADANLAL CHOUDHARYV. UNION OF INDIA Read More »

OVERVIEW OF THE CASE Case Name B,K Pavitra v. Union Of India Civil Case No.  2368 of 2011 Appellant B.K Pavitra and Ors. Respondent The State of Karnataka and SC,ST Engineer’s welfare association and The Union Of India, Cases referred Indra Sawhney v. Union of India 1992M.Nagraj v. Union Of India 2006Jarnail Singh v. Lacchmi …

B.K PAVITRA V. UNION OF INDIA Read More »

Equivalent Citation: (2020) 1 SCC 1 Date of Judgement: November 9, 2019. Court: Supreme Court. Case Number: 10866-10867 of 2010. Case Type: Civil Appeal. Petitioner: M Siddiq (deceased). Respondent: Mahant Suresh Das & Ors. Bench: Ranjan Gogoi, D.Y.Chandrachud, S.A.Bobde, S.A.Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan. Common Name: Ayodhya Land Dispute Case, Ram Janam Bhoomi Case Or Ram Mandir …

M SIDDIQ (D) THR LRS. VS MAHANT SURESH DAS & ORS. Read More »

DATE: March 2, 2023 PETITIONER: Anoop Baranwal RESPONDENT: Union of India BENCH: Justice K.M. Joseph (headed the bench), Justice Ajay Rastogi, Justice Aniruddha Bose, Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Justice C.T. Ravikumar. CASE NUMBER: WP(C) 104/2015 LEGAL PROVISIONS: The Constitution of India (fundamental rights, Article 324, Article 142 and Article 248) and the Election Commission (Conditions …

ANOOP BARANWAL v. UNION OF INDIA, 2023 Read More »

NAME Vinod Dua v. Union Of India CITATION WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.154 OF 2020 BENCH Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran PETITIONERS Vinod Dua RESPONDENTS  UOI  & Ors.   FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED ARGUMENTS ADVANCED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER ARGUMENTS ADVANCED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS RATIONALE INFERENCE The Supreme Court issued the …

VINOD DUA v. UNION OF INDIA 2021 SCC  SC 414 Read More »

INTRODUCTION The case of “Ruchika Girhotra v. SPS Rathore” is a significant legal matter in India, officially cited as “Ruchika Girhotra v. SPS Rathore (2009) 5 SCC 539.” The parties involved in this case were Ruchika Girhotra, the victim, and SPS Rathore, the respondent. The judgment was delivered by a bench of the Supreme Court …

Ruchika Girhota v. SPS Rathore Read More »

INTRODUCTION: Contempt of court is defined as deliberate disobedience of any order, judgement, or verdict issued by the court, as well as making derogatory words about any court that may harm its reputation. The courts have been granted the authority to punish individuals for contempt of court in order to guarantee that the rulings, orders, …

Case Commentary: Prashant Bhushan, In re (Contempt Matter), (2021) 3 SCC 160 Read More »

BENCH : CJI D.Y. Chandrachud , J. S.K. Kaul , J. Ravindra Bhat , J. HIMA  KHOLI  & J. P.S. Narasimha . CITATION : W.P.(C) No. 1011 /2022 Diary No. 36593/2022 . PETITIONERS : SUPRIYO CHAKRABORTY, ABHAY DANG, PARTH PHIROZE MEHROTRA, UDAY RAJ ANAND. RESPONDENT : UNION OF INDIA . FACTS OF THE CASE This …

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. v Union of India Read More »

 WP (CIVIL) NO.1031 OF 2019 AIR 2020 SC 1308 Facts : The Indian territory of Jammu and Kashmir, which borders Pakistan, has been the focus of an ongoing conflict between the two nations for many years. The territory had its own constitution, special status under Article 370[1]of the Indian Constitution, and property ownership by Indian …

ANURADHA BHASIN    VS    UNION OF INDIA Read More »

FACTS  This is the murder case of sex worker Shrimati Chhayai Rani Pal alias Buri (45) by accused Budhadev Karmaskar. The incident occurred on September 17, 1999, at around 9: pm. Inside a three-storey building on Jogen Duta Lane, Calcutta’s red-light district. Mrs Buri was a resident of the building.[1] This time, cases involving sex …

Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal and Others Read More »

Court – Supreme Court of India Citation- 2022 SCC Online SC 1494 Date of case:  23 Jan 2023 Case no : C.A No –000077-000077/ 2023 Bench: Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Justice PS Narshimha Petitioner’s advocate : Abhinav Shrivastava Respondent’s advocate: Aditya Sharma Judgement by : Honourable CJI . ABSTRACT FACTS OF THE CASE:  ISSUE RAISED …

CASE COMMENTARY ON K.C CINEMA V. STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR Read More »

Date of Judgement – 19 May, 2023 Bench – Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Prashant Kumar Mishra Petitioner – Mansi Khatri Respondent – Gaurav Khatri Case No.- Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1595 OF 2022 Facts of the case In the above mentioned case both the parties were married on 12.12.16 and then separated on 29.10.22 …

Mansi Khatri vs Gaurav Khatri Read More »

                Citation: Criminal Appeal No(s). 135/2010                Bench/Judge: Justices L. Nageswara Rao, B.R.Gavai and A.S. Bopanna INTRODUCTION The important ruling on the rights of sex workers is Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal. discusses their profession’s respect and dignity in accordance with Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. The Supreme Court issued guidelines in …

BUDHADEV KARMASKAR V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL 2022 Read More »

Court Supreme Court of India Citation 2022 SCC Online SC 1494 Date of the Case 31st October 2023 Bench Justice D.Y Chandrachud and Justice Hima Kohli Appellant The State of Jharkhand Respondent Shailendra Kumar Rai@ Pandav Rai FACTS OF THE CASE: The facts of the case indicate that the respondent was accused of raping a …

CASE COMMENTARY ON STATE OF JHARKHAND v. SHAILENDRA KUMAR RAI Read More »

INTRODUCTION The ongoing case Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab has become a contentious one concerning the death sentence. Following the adoption of the constitution, a number of legislative efforts addressing the practicality and legitimacy of the death sentence were introduced. The Criminal Procedure Code was modified in 1973 to need “special reasons” in order …

Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab Read More »

FAO (OS) (Comm)59/ 2023 and CM Nos 14793/ 2023 & 14794/ 2023 Facts On 20th December 2018, Tomorrow Sales Agency Pvt Ltd (TSA) had entered a ‘Bespoke funding agreement’ (BFA) to fund the arbitral proceedings of Anant K. Choudhary, Vivek Shula, SBS Transpole Logistics Private Limited and Pravin Chandra Rai(hereinafter ‘the claimants) against SBS and …

Tomorrow Sales Agency Pvt Ltd v SBS Holdings Inc. and Ors Read More »

For Appellant: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Jagia, Mr. Vikram Pooserla Mr. Aahana Madhyala, Advocates. For Respondent: Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Malvika Kalra, Mr. Pranav Sarthi Ms. Divya Datla Raju, Advocates. Bench J. Amaravati Bench Court National Company Law Tribunal, Amaravati Bench Case Number: CP(IB)/204/7/AMR/2019 Date Of Judgement: 12.02.2020 FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES …

CASE COMMENTARY ON KVR INDUSTRIES PVT LTD V. PP BAFNA VENTURES PVT LTD Read More »

Date of Judgment May 11, 2023, Petitioner’s Name Government of NCT of Delhi (National Capital Territory of Delhi) Respondent’s Name Union of India Citation 2023 SCC OnLine SC 606 Court Supreme Court of India Bench Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice PS Narasimha, Justice Hima Kohli, Justice Krishna Murari, Justice M.R. Shah Law Involved Article 239 …

CASE COMMENTARY ON GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. UNION OF INDIA (2023) Read More »

Facts The plaintiff, in this case, filed a suit against the appellant-defendant seeking for and pleading immediate declaration, order and permanent injunction to restrict the appellant-defendant from copying, using or enabling others to use its designs in which the appellant-defendant sought cancellation of the said registered designs. In a gist, the appellant-defendant wanted to seek …

Case Commentary of S.D. Containers v. Mold-Tek Packaging Ltd. Read More »

CITATION –   2022 SCC OnLine 1321 DATE OF JUDGEMENT 29 SEPTEMBER 2022 CASE NUMBER – Civil Appeal No. 5802 of 2022 arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 12612 of 2022    JURISDICTION – Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India PETITIONER – Mrs. X   RESPONDENT – The Principal Secretary, Health and Family …

X Vs. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. Read More »

Citation: 2021 SCC Online 19 Appeal: Criminal Appeal 1919 of 2010 Decided on: 12th January, 2021 Bench: N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant, Aniruddha Bose Brief Facts of the Case: Facts of the case: Proceedings: The accused approached the Supreme Court of India with an appeal to set aside the order of the High Court of Gujarat. …

Case Commentary on Anversinh @ Kiransinh Fatesinh ZALA.Vs. State of Gujarat Read More »

CITATION AIR SC 1501 DATE OF JUDGMENT 11th MAY 2023 CASE NUMBER Writ Petition (C) No. 493 of 2022 PETITIONER Subhash Desai RESPONDENT Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra & Ors. BENCH Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud (C.J), M.R. Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and P.S. Narasimha JJ. FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED CONTENTION FROM BOTH THE PARTIES …

CASE COMMENT ON SUBHASH DESAI V.  PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNOR OF MAHARASHTRA & [1] ORS. Read More »

Date of Judgement April 26, 2023 Bench Justice V. Ramasubramanian and Justice Pankaj Mithal   Advocates representing the Appellant’s side Ms. Swati Ghildiyal and Ms. Aniruddha P. Mayee, Advocates   Advocates representing the Respondent’s side Rameshwar Prasad Goyal and Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocates BACKGROUND OF THE CASE: The respondents in the present case are those …

CASE COMMENTARY ON STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. V. DR. PA BHATT & ORS. (2023) Read More »