IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.3543 of 2020 Facts: The case of Paramvir Singh Saini vs. Baljit Singh & Ors is a legal matter that revolves around the implementation of CCTV cameras, oversight committees, and directives issued by the Supreme Court in India. The …
Case No.: Criminal Appeal Nos. 17351736 Satbir Singh Case : Supreme Court Guidelines for trial in dowry death cases, (banerji, 2021) FACTS OF THE CASE The appellant was found guilty of violating sections 304-B and 306 of IPC by the trial Court in an order dated on 11.12.1997. Under section 304-B of IPC they were given 7 …
AIR (2019) 4 SCC 17 Introduction: Citation AIR (2019) 4 SCC 17 Date of Judgment 25 January, 2019 Court Supreme Court of India Petitioner Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. Respondent Union of India Facts: The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “Code”) is a comprehensive Bankruptcy law …
INTRODUCTION The case of Vikash Kumar v Union Public Services Commission & Ors (2021) is an important landmark case in the area of disability rights in India. The Supreme Court of India in its judgement held that a person who is suffering from Writer’s Cramp or dysgraphia, which has not been certified as a benchmark …
Vikash Kumar v. Union Public Service Commission & Ors. (2021) Read More »
Abstract This case relates to the two most heinous crimes, the first is rape and the other is murder. The victim in this case was raped and burnt by pouring kerosene on her body. Another significant issue involved was the controversial “two-finger test’’[1], which violates women’s right to privacy and has been denounced by courts …
State of Jharkhand vs Shailendra Kumar Rai@ Pandav Rai Read More »
This case is about CJI coming under the RTI Act. So, The Supreme Court of India was required by the Central Information Commission (CIC) to provide information about the Collegium’s decision-making process in November 2009. The CIC’s ruling concerns activist Subhash Chandra Agarwal’s request for information under the right to privacy. The CIC specifically mandated …
COURT: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA LEGAL PROVISION: MTP,1971, RULE 3B OF THE MTPR,2003 BENCH: HON’BLE DR. CHANDRACHUD, HON’BLE MS. LOHLI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA PARTIES: X.…… …
X VS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVT OF NCT DELHI Read More »
Facts This case is concerned with an issue of importance with respect to the rights of animals (i,e., bulls) on the one hand while trying to preserve the culture and tradition of Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, and Karnataka on the other hand. This case majorly deals with the practice of ‘Jallikattu’, a sport conducted for entertainment …
Animal Welfare Board of India Vs. A. Nagaraja and others Read More »
FACTS In the given case, Bhopal Sugar Industries LTD. was the appellant whereas the Sales Tax Officer, Bhopal was the respondent. The suit was basically filed to collect sales tax from the appellate considering that the usage of the product by the appellate itself was a sale as the respondent appellate was considered to be …
BHOPAL SUGAR INDUSTRIES LTD. V SALES TAX OFFICER, BHOPAL Read More »
VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) [2020] 3 SCC 637. FACTS Background: On August 5, 2019, the Indian government revoked the special status granted to the state of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution of India. This decision was followed by a series of measures imposed by the government, including the suspension of …
Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 1441 of 2022 Date of the case: 31st October 2022 Bench :Hon’ ble Justice Dr. Chandrachud, Hon’ble Justice Ms. Kohli. Sections involved: IPC Sections – 300, 302, 307,375,376,448. CrPC sections – 173,174, Indian Evidence Act sections- 32(1), 60. Constitution of India – Article 136. Appellant: The State of Jharkhand Respondent: Shalendra …
Case: State of Jharkhand v. Shailendra Kumar Rai, 2022 SC 1441 Read More »
The main issue that was raised in the case was, whether the fundamental rights to freedom of religion of the Zoroastrian community under Article 25 of the constitution of India were violated because of the guidelines and protocol made by the union of India for covid-19 pandemic. The contentions of the appellants were that the …
ABSTRACT In the contemporary era, the global community grapples with diverse illnesses, and ongoing technological and methodological advancements contribute to the field of clinical medicine. Unfortunately, a significant number of individuals succumb to various causes, including suicide or the inability to access essential medical treatment. Within societal structures, the provision of palliative care and …
“THE FIGHT AGAINST EUTHANASIA AND IT’S LEGAL PERSPECTIVE” Read More »
AbstractBy hearing the word insane, we thought of a mentally disturbed person who is innocent as a child and cannot think like a normal person. If we talk about insanity in legal language, then it may differ. Yes, insanity is used as a defence in criminal liability. We use a word for insanity that is …
Legal Insanity and What’s the Difference Between Legal Insanity and Mental Insanity Read More »
Abstract This research delves into the escalating issue of drug abuse among juveniles in India, scrutinizing the multifaceted dimensions and exploring the evolving role of the judiciary. Grounded in the wisdom of leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Dr. APJ Kalam, who emphasized nurturing the future of the nation, the study unveils the disconcerting reality that …
Understanding the judicial response to juvenile drug abuse Read More »
ABSTRACT Marriage is an union between two individuals established through religious ceremonies, or legal contract which is recognised socially or ritually. In this modern era the definition of marriage has gone through various changes, historically the primary purpose behind performance of marriage was to procreation, transfer of property , and Maintenance of social order etc …
A Culture of Love: Examining Same-Sex Relationships in various aspects Read More »
Abstract India has been home to many refugees. India lacks clear domestic refugee laws, leaving lakhs of refugees in poverty without basic necessities. Absence of uniform laws and political considerations lead to potential discrimination. Ad hoc government measures offer minimal legal protection, especially for civil and political rights, and leave refugees vulnerable, lacking safety and …
Abstract Including ‘smart contracts’ in the legal frameworks of contracts in India could be an evolution of traditional contracts and transactions. This evolution can be in some areas of existing laws or a total advancement. Transactions and contracts are relevant at a global level at present times, especially when we are witnessing the legal integration …
Smart Contracts and the Indian Contract Act: Compatibility and Implications Read More »
Date of the case – 14 February 2011 Judgement of the case – May 2022 Appellant –Buddhadev karmaskar Respondent – State of West Bengal & ORS Bench / Judges – Markandey katju ,Gyan sudha misra Legal Provision – Constitution of India, Article 14, 19, 21, 142 IPC – section 302, CRPC –Section 164, 357C FACTS …
CASE : Buddhadev Karmaskar vs State of West Bengal Read More »
BENCH Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, Justice Krishna Murari PROCEDURAL HISTORY The appellant, in this case, had filed a suit in the Trial Court, for partition, claiming a one-fifth share in a certain property. Following the dismissal of the suit by the Trial Court, the appellant appealed at the High Court of Madras, under Section 96 …
Case Comment: Arunachala Gounder (dead) By Lrs v. Ponnusamy Read More »
Reportable- Supreme Court of India Under – Extra Ordinary Appellate JurisdictionCitation -Special Leave Petition (civil) No 12612 of 2022 Date of Judgment- Sept 29, 2022 Bench- Justice D.Y Chandrachud, Justice S. Bopanna, Justice B. Pardiwala. Parties- X V/s (Petitioner) , Principal Secretary Health And Family welfare, Govt of NTC Delhi (Respondent) Introduction In …
Case- X v/s Principal Secretary Health And Family welfare, Government of NTC Delhi. Read More »
Bench: Justice Hima Kohli and CJI D.Y.Chandrachud Case No.: Criminal Appeal No.1441 of 2022 Appellant: State of Jharkhand Respondent: Shailendra Kumar Rai Appellant’s Advocate: Madhusmita Bora Court: Supreme Court of India Judgment Date: 31 October 2022 Facts of the case The fact of the case of the prosecution is that the respondent entered the house …
DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 2nd March, 2023. PETITIONER: Anoop Baranwal RESPONDENT: Union of India BENCH: Honourable Justices K.M. Joseph, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy, C.T. Ravikumar LEGAL PROVISIONS: The Constitution of India CITATION: W.P.(C) 114/2015 FACTS Several Public Interest Litigations (PIL) were filed in the Supreme Court to review the manner of appointment of the …
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.1849 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.5191 OF 2021 FACTS ISSUES RAISED: The Supreme Court made it clear that the twin bail conditions stipulated by Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering (PMLA) Act were invalid in the present case. In addition, the Apex Court established rules for the granting of bail …
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation Read More »
Court Name:- The Supreme Court Of India Jurisdiction:- Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appeal Number:- Civil Appeal No 5802 of 2022(Arising out of SLP (C) No 12612 of 2022) Petitioner:- X Respondent [s]:-The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr Bench:-Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud J.,A S Bopanna J.,J B Pardiwala …
NAME OF THE CASE Pawan Kumar Gupta vs. State of NCT of Delhi[1] CITATION (2020) 03 SC CK 0075 SLP(Criminal) No. 547 of 2020 [Arising out of SLP(Crl.) D No. 2122 of 2020] APPELLANT Pawan Kumar Gupta RESPONDENT State of NCT of Delhi DATE OF JUDGEMENT 20 January 2020 BENCH/ JUDGE R. Banumathi, Ashok …
PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA V. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Read More »
Case Comment Citation Writ Petition (Civil) No. 607 of 2021(1) Date of Judgement 2nd May 2022 Petitioner’s Name Jacob Puliyel Respondent’s Name Union of India & Ors Court Supreme Court of India (Civil Original Jurisdiction) Bench Justice L. Nageswara Rao & Justice B.R Gavai Important Section/Article of Law Article 21 of the Constitution of India …
Date Of Judgement: 28/04/2023 APPELLANTS : Karnataka power transmission corporation LTD & Ors. RESPONDENT : Sri B.G Manamohana Priyanka &Ors BENCH/JUDGE : M.R. Shah, J.B. Pardiwala Legal Provisions:Labour Law , Constitution of India Civil Appeal No :2702 OF 2023 Facts Here writ petitioners – respondents were appointed as assistant executive engineer in the appellant corporation …
DATE OF JUDGEMENT: September 13,2023 APPELLANT: Javed Shaukat Ali Qureshi RESPONDENT: The State of Gujarat BENCH: Hon’ble Justice Abhay S. Oka and Hon’ble Justice Sanjay Karol CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1012 OF 2022 FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED One of those who was found guilty (appellant) appealed the conviction before the Supreme Court, challenging the …
Case: Javed Shaukat Ali Qureshi vs The State Of Gujarat Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE In the legal matter of Balram Garg v. Securities and Exchange Board of India[1] (SEBI), the litigation centred on allegations of insider trading[2] within the intricate framework of the Indian securities market. Central to this legal dispute were the pivotal figures of the Chairman and the Managing Director, holding positions of …
Citation: Writ Petition Civil No.576 of 2016 Date of Judgement: 17th January 2019 Name of Appellate: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (AHAR) Name of Respondent: The State of Maharashtra and Ors. Bench: Justice A. K. Sikri and Justice A. Bhushan Legal Provisions: Article 14, 15, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), 21; Section 2(8)(i), 6(4), 8(1), 8(4) of the …
Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association & Anr. V. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Read More »
(Criminal appeal no.98 of 2021) [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 11616 of 2019] Facts: an unlawful act against a Professor in Kerala following the objectionable questions framed by him in B. Com examination. He was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2015 since he was a member of Popular Front of India, a fundamentalist group under UAPA (Unlawful …
CASE COMMENT FACTS Satish, the accused, lived in the same neighborhood as the 12-year-old girl, who is the prosecution’s witness. On December 14, 2016, around 11:30 a.m., the girl went out to pick guavas. She didn’t return for an extended period, prompting her mother, who is the informant, to search for her. A nearby resident …
SATISH S/O BANDU RAGDE VS STATE OF MAH., THR. P.S.O. … ON 19 JANUARY, 2021 Read More »
Equivalent Citations Digambar vs. the State of Maharashtra Date of Judgement 28th April 2023 Court Supreme Court of India Case No. 221-222 Case Type Appeal Appellant Digamber Respondent State of Maharashtra Bench Justice B.R.Gavai Legal Provisions Section 302,34 of the Indian Penal Code, BACKGROUND OF THE CASE Pooja (deceased) was in love with Govind (deceased) …
CASE COMMENT DATE OF THE CASE: 15th December, 2020 APPELLANT: Smt. S. Vanitha RESPONDENT: The Deputy Commissioner BENCH/JUDGES: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud (J), Indu Malhotra (J), Indira Banerjee (J) LEGAL PROVISIONS: Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 CIVIL APPEAL NO.: 3822/2020 …
SMT. S. VANITHA v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU, URBAN DISTRICT & ORS. Read More »
COURT: Supreme Court of India DATE OF DECISION: 13 November, 2019 CASE NO.: Civil Appeal no. 10044/2010 FACTS: ISSUE RAISED: CONTENTION The appellants made the following arguments: The respondent made the following claims: RATIONALE: The summary of judgment is as follows: On November 13, 2019, the Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and ruled in …
CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA V. SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL Read More »
Date of the Case: May 11, 2023Appellant: Government of NCT of Delhi (National Capital Territory of Delhi)Respondent: Union of IndiaBench: Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice M.R. Shah, Justice Krishna Murari, Justice Hima Kohli, Justice PS NarasimhaLegal Provisions: Constitution of India, 1949, Article 239, Constitution of India, 1949, Article 239 AACitations: 2023 SCC OnLine …
DATE OF THE CASE– 11th July,2022 APPELLANT- Satender Kumar Antil RESPONDENTS– Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) & Anr. BENCH/JUDGES– Hon’ble Mr Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon’ble Mr Justice M.M. Sundresh LEGAL PROVISIONS– S.41, S.41 A and S. 60A of The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) CIVIL APPEAL NUMBER– 5191 FACTS ISSUE RAISED CONTENTION ON BEHALF …
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. Read More »
CASE COMMENT: FACTS: In this case, a special leave petition has been brought in the Supreme Court of India. This petition was filed in response to a decree issued by the division of bench of the Madras High Court. That case had been initiated by an AIADMK candidate to investigate the covid 19 guidelines and …
Date – 29/03/2019 Appellant– Pattu Rajan Respondent- State of Tamil Nadu Bench – Justice N.V Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Indira Banerjee, JJ. Facts: Issue raised 1.Is the conviction of the accused (appellant) by the High Court of Tamil Nadu legally valid or not? 2. Weather Pattu Rajan actually murdered santhakumar or not? Contentions by Appellant …
Bench– Justice Ravindra Bhat and Justice Aravind Kumar Citation – APPEAL 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1089 FACTS The petitioner has filed a case under Article 32 of the Constitution, expressing grievance over the rejection of her application for a Post Graduate medical seat. This rejection took place after she had participated in the NEET (PG) …
Name of the Parties: Facts of the Case: Siva Industries had acquired shares of TATA Sons between years 1961 to 2001. In 2017, TATA Sons underwent a scheme of arrangement to convert from a public limited company to a private limited company. Siva Industries challenged this conversion. TATA Sons Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as …
Citation: 2022 SCC OnLine SC 704 Appellant: Budhadev Karmaskar Respondent: State of West Bengal Bench: Justices L. Nageswara Rao, B.R Gavai and A.S Bopanna Introduction In India sex work is considered to be a despicable profession and it is stigmatized by society. Despite the fact that every individual in India has right to life and …
Case Comment: Budhadev Karmaskar v. State of West Bengal and Ors. Read More »
Case: In Re Prashant Bhushan & Anr. (2020) Case Type: Suo Moto Criminal Proceeding Bench: B.R. Gavai J, Krishna Murari J, Arun Mishra J Citation: SCM (CRL.) No.000001 -/2020 FACTS OF THE CASE The case started when Prashant Bhushan made two tweets in June 2020 that were critical of the Indian judiciary. In one tweet, …
CITATION – Civil Appeal No. 7598 of 2021 DATE OF JUDGMENT- 11-07-2022 PETITONER- Satendra KumarAntil RESPONDENT- CBI BENCH– Justice Sanjay kishankauland Justice M.M Sundresh INTRODUCTION In accordance with Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a probe is finished when the investigative agency presents its final conclusions to the court once the police report …
SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL VS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Read More »
DATE OF THE CASE: 12 February, 2020 APPELLANT: Shruti Vora RESPONDENTS: Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) BENCH/JUDGES: Justice M.T. Joshi, Dr. C.K.G Nair, Justice Tarun Agarwala LEGAL PROVISIONS: SEBI Act, 1992, SEBI (PIT) Regulation, 2015. APPEAL NO: 28 of 2020. FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED CONTENTIONS ASSERTION OF THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER ASSERTION …
Shruti Vohra vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India Read More »
Court: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Date of the Case: May 28, 2021 Appeal Nos.: 17351736 of 2010 Appellant: Satbir Singh and Another Respondent: State of Haryana Bench/ Judge: N.V. Ramana (CJI), Aniruddha Bose, Surya Kant Facts of the Cases Issues Raised Contention on behalf of Appellant The appellant’s learned senior attorney argued that the …
Satbir Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana (2021 SCC Online SC 404) Read More »
CITATION – SLP (Crl) No. 1132-1155 of 2022 DATE OF JUDGMENT – 29th July, 2022 COURT – Supreme Court of India APPELLANT – Daxaben RESPONDENT – The State of Gujarat BENCH – Justices Indira Banerjee and V.Ramasubramanian FACTS ISSUES CONTENTION DEFENDANT’S ARGUMENT PLAINTIFF’S ARGUMENT RATIONALE Justices Indira Banerjee and V. Ramasubramanian’s bench stated that inciting …
DATE OF THE CASE: 20 January, 2022 APPELLANT: Arunachala Gounder (Dead) by LRS. RESPONDENT: Ponnusamy and Ors. BENCH/ JUDGES: Justice S. Abdul Nazeer and Justice Krishna Murari LEGAL PROVISIONS: Section 14 and Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. FACTS: Gurunatha Gounder had two sons, Marappa Gounder and Ramasamy Gounder. In 1938, Marappa Gounder …
CASE: ARUNACHALA GOUNDER (DEAD) BY LRS. V. PONNUSAMY AND ORS. (2022 SCC ONLINE SC 72) Read More »
CASE COMMENTARY Appellant: State of Jharkhand Respondent: Shailendra Kumar Rai Court: Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal No. 1441 of 2022 Bench: Hon’ble Justice DY Chandrachud and Hon’ble Justice Hima Kohli Date decided: 31st October 2022 FACTS OF THE CASE The facts of this case were a dying declaration from the victim. The respondent raped …
CASE COMMENTARY CITATION: Criminal appeal no. 135/2010 DATE OF THE CASE: February 28, 2022 APPELLANT: Budhadev Karmaskar RESPONDENT: State of West Bengal BENCH/JUDGES: Justices L. Nageswara Rao, B.R. Gavai, and A.S Bopanna LEGAL PROVISIONS: Article 21 of The Constitution of India, 1949, Section 164 of CrPC, 1973 FACTS: ISSUES RAISED: CONTENTION: Arguments from the Petitioner’s …
CASE: BUDHADEV KARMASKAR V. STATE OF WEST BENGAL 2022 SCC ONLINE SC 704 Read More »
Citation: 2023 Latest Caselaw 723 SC Bench: Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Sanjay Karol Criminal Appeal No: 1012 of 2022 Date of Judgment: September 13, 2023 Legal Provisions /Acts: Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 436, 452 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of …
Javed Shaukat Ali Qureshi v. State of Gujarat, Supreme Court of India, 2023. Read More »
Introduction Marriage is considered as a scarcement of soul and lives. Among Hindus, marriage is a sacramental union of two people. Marriage is considered as a union by laying down that even death cannot put marriage asunder. A man is considered to be incomplete without his wife and it is the wife who completes him. …
Laxmibai Chandaragi B & Anr. V State Of Karnataka & Ors (2020) Read More »
YEAR OF THE CASE: 9th April 2021 APPELLANT: Farzana Batool and Mohammad Mehdi Waziri RESPONDENTS: Union of India and Others BENCH: Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Justice M.R. Shah WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO: 375 of 2021 and 364 of 2021 INTRODUCTION Learning is the path to enlightenment. It encourages a man to grow. It …
Date: 04/03/2020 Court: The Apex Court of India Appellant: Internet and Mobile Association of India Respondent: Reserve Bank of India Judges: Rohinton Fali Nariman, Aniruddha Bose, V. Ramasubramanian Brief Facts: On the 6th of April, 2018, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the nation’s central banking institution, issued a circular prohibiting RBI-regulated bodies, other individuals, …
Internet and Mobile Association V/s Reserve Bank of India (2020 SCC online SC 275) Read More »
2023 SCC OnLine SC 1129 In the Supreme Court of India (Before S. Ravindra Bhat and Aravind Kumar, JJ.) N. Ramkumar … Appellant Versus State Rep. by Inspector of Police … Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 2006 of 2023 Decided on September 6, 2023 Intention and knowledge are crucial in criminal law, as they focus on …
Case Comment – N. Ramkumar Vs State Rep. by Inspector of Police Read More »
DATE OF THE CASE: 5th January, 2023 PETITIONER/APPLICANT: Tata Sons Private Limited (Formerly Tata Sons Limited) RESPONDENTS: 1. Siva Industries and Holdings Limited 2. Mr C Sivasankaran, a resident of Seychelles BENCH/JUDGES: Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, C.J. and P.S. Narasimha, J. CASE TYPE & NUMBER: Miscellaneous Application No. 2680 of 2019 In Arbitration Case (Civil) …
SUBMITTED BY PAVITHRA K S – 200401417041 BA LLB (Hons.) Alliance University, Alliance School of Law, Bengaluru. FACTS The appellant/accused showed a strong interest in marrying PW1 (the complainant), even though she was already married to Santhkumar. 1.On 01/10/2001, the accused abducted the victim (Santhkumar) and his wife (PW1). There was another related case that …
PATTU RAJAN AND Ors. Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU, 2019 4 SCC 771 Read More »
(Criminal appeal no.98 of 2021) [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 11616 of 2019] Facts: an unlawful act against a Professor in Kerala following the objectionable questions framed by him in B. Com examination. He was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2015 since he was a member of Popular Front of India, a fundamentalist group under UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention …
Gender equality in India is most desired form, which our nation is craving for since long. Gender equality is no more a moral pressure or social issue but also a social, economic challenge. For overall development of the nation gender equality is very essential. In the era of full of opportunities india lacking in its …
INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION & ORS. VS. THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS [2019 11 SCC 1] Read More »
Date of judgement: 10-01-2020 Petitioner: Anuradha Bhasin Respondent: Union of India and Ors Bench: N.V.Ramana, V.Ramasubramanian INTRODUCTION Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India is a landmark case in Constitutional Law as it ponders in depth into the ambit of Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression. On the eve of abrogation of Article 370, by …
ANURADHA BHASIN V. UNION OF INDIA WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2019 Read More »
Citation: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3123 of 2020 Facts The case of Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. The Chief Minister centres around the intricate dynamics of India’s reservation policy, particularly concerning the Maratha community. The chronology of events paints a vivid picture: Issues raised The case brought forth these multifaceted issues, highlighting the intricate balance between affirmative action, …
Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. The Chief Minister Read More »
CASE COMMENT: – COURT: – SUPREME COURT OF INDIACASE NO: – Supreme Court Special Leave Petition (SLP) No. 71 of 2022STATE OF MAHARASTRA AND ANOTHER Vs. Dr. MAROTI (2023) Appellant: – The State of Maharashtra and Another Respondent: – Dr. Maroti CITATION: – (2023) 4 SCC 298 Date Of Judgement: – 02/11/2022 Justice Bench: – …
FACTS The ruling and decision made by the knowledgeable single bench of the High Court dismissing the revision petition, which was contested in the current appeal, which was submitted in opposition to the Hon. Session Judge’s order; as a result, they requested a stay of the conviction, which was denied. In 2019, Rahul Gandhi, a …
RAHUL GANDHI V. PURNESH ISHWERBHAI MODI AND ANR 2023 (SC) 598 Read More »