It is very well known that gifts given to the bride at the time of her marriage by her parents, husband, in-laws, or relatives are her “stridhan”. Stridhan is a pious concept that has been followed from old times. It is movable or immovable property given to her before, after, or at the time of …
It is very well known that gifts given to the bride at the time of her marriage by her parents, husband, in-laws, or relatives are her “stridhan”. Stridhan is a pious concept that has been followed from old times. It is movable or immovable property given to her before, after, or at the time of …
Table of Contents ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 FACTS OF THE CASE…………………………………………………………………………………………3 ISSUES RAISED IN THE CASE…………………………………………………………..4 CONTENTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 RATIONALE………………… ………………………………………………………………………………..7 DEFECTS SEEN IN THE CASE ………………………………………………………………………………7 INFERENCE…………………………………. …………………………………………………………..9 REFERENCES………………………………………………………………………………9 ABSTRACT “Right to health has found its apt place as an ingredient of the sacrosanct and topmost right to life in the scheme of fundamental rights within …
Karnataka High Court denies request to dismiss FIR for causing offense to a woman’s modesty by writing her phone number on a toilet wall. I. Advocates who appeared in this case: For petitioner- Tejas N., Advocate For respondents- B. N. Jagadeesh, Addl. Spp For R1; R Gopala Krishnan, Advocate For R2. II. Judge(s): Hon’ble Mr. …
Date of Judgement 7th November 2019 Petitioner Manoharan Respondents State by inspector Police Variety Hall Police Station, Coimbatore Bench Fali Nariman, Sanjiv Khanna and Surya Kant 1.Facts of the case 2.Issues 3.Analysis 3.1 Contentions of the petitioner Firstly, the petitioner contended that whatever confessional statement was given by him was not voluntary at all in …
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Manoharan vs State By Inspector of Police AIR 2019 Read More »
FACTS Kate Cox, a 31-year-old Texas woman who is blessed with two children had filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas. She has asked the court to declare that she had a right to abortion, when she learned that her fetus of 20 weeks had a genetic condition (Edwards syndrome) which causes death of …
Facts The Criminal Appeal at the Supreme Court originated from a decision made by the Jharkhand High Court on February 17, 2014. A election was conducted on March 30, 2012, to choose two Rajya Sabha members representing the State of Jharkhand. The appellant, who serves as a representative of the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha in the Legislative …
Court No-6 Bench: HON’BLE JUSTICE B.V NAGARATHNA HON’BLE JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN Item No- 08 (Crl.) No.118 Of 2003 Case details: The petitioner of this case, Bilkis Yakub Rasool was brutally and mercilessly gang-raped namely, during the Gujrat communal riot in 2002, who was 5 months pregnant at the time of this fiendish circumstance and also …
CASE TITLE: BILKIS YAKUB RASOOL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA Read More »
INTRODUCTION An extensive analysis of election procedures and the responsibilities of the Election Commission of India (ECI) may be found in the ruling of Ram Babu Thakur vs. Sunil Arora and Ors.. on May 20, 2022. This analysis examines the facts of the case, pertinent legal issues, the decisions made, and the wider ramifications for …
Citation-TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1118 OF 2014.. Bench – The judgment was given by the constitutional bench which comprised of, Justice Sanjiv Khanna , ,Justice Vikram Nath ,Justice Jk Maheshwari Justice Sk Kaul and Justice As Oka Jha Brief facts – The case highlighted the matter where the respondent Shipla Shailesh and the appellant Varun …
CASE COMMENTARY Shilpa Sailesh vs Varun Sreenivasan on 1 May, 2023 Read More »
FACTS On June 9, 2016, the Indian Ex-Servicemen Movement—an “All India Federation of Ex-Servicemen’s organizations”—as well as individual veterans of the Indian Army, Navy, and Air Force filed a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution with the Supreme Court to challenge the “One Rank One Pension policy” (OROP) for former members of the Defense …
INDIAN EX-SERVICEMEN MOVEMENT V. UNION OF INDIA 2023 INSC 219 Read More »
CITATION Civil Appeal No. 2732 of 2020 DATE OF THE JUDGMENT July 13, 2020 BENCH 2-Judges Bench comprising Justice Uday Umesh Lalit & Justice Indu Malhotra BACKGROUND FACTS ISSUES RAISED CONTENTIONS JUDGEMENT (RATIONALE) Thus; the Hon’ble Supreme Court overruled the judgment of the Kerala High Court & decided the case, in favour of the Royal …
CASE COMMENT: SHRI MARTHANDA VARMA (D) TH. LR. VS STATE OF KERALA (2020) Read More »
FACTS In this case, the individuals appealing the case were the wife and son of the defendant who was charged by the Lokayukta Police under section 13(1)(e) and section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. As the trial was ongoing, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) also filed a case against the defendant and the appellants …
PARVATHI KOLLUR v. STATE BY DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT 2021 Read More »
Bench- Chief Justice of India (the then CJI) Ranjan Gogoi and members Justices Rohinton Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra Background of the Case The Sabarimala Temple[1] in Kerala, dedicated to Lord Ayyappa,[2] historically prohibited women of menstruating age (10-50 years) from going in the temple due to the belief that menstruating females are …
ABSTRACT The criminal justice system provides the mean, or framework, for enforcing laws, adjudicating criminal offenses, and protecting public safety. This article is the first to provide a comprehensive review of the many aspects of the justice system, including police prosecution and corrections, with the primary focus on systemic barriers and reforms. Zeroed in on …
FACTS The given appeal arose from the judgement delivered by the High Court of Calcutta in 2015, in which the court quashed the complaint of the Appellant under Sections 379, 403 and 411 of the IPC. Furthermore, the appeals arise from a criminal complaint filed by the Appellant company, now under the control of Respondent …
Birla Corporation Ltd. v Adventz investments and Holdings Ltd, 2019 Read More »
Background 1. Facts 2. Issues Raised 3. Contentions Contentions of Appellant (Delhi Government): The appellants, the Government of NCT of Delhi, contended that the elected government should have substantial control over the administrative and legislative affairs of Delhi, barring the explicitly reserved domains of land, police, and public order. They argued that under Article 239AA …
Case Comment: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Union of India (2023) Read More »
Decided on– April 27,2021 Appellant- Patan Jaman Vali Respondent– The state of Andhra Pradesh Coram– D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah Facts[1]– The appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment by Sessions Court under section 3(2) (v) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and section 376 (1) of IPC as well as …
On 10 February, 2020 AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 1036, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 225, (2020) 1 KER LT 810, (2020) 1 MAD LJ(CRI) 378, (2020) 4 SCALE 198 Facts: In the landmark case of Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India (2020), the constitutional validity of reservations and affirmative action policies for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and …
FACTS: The appellant, a 25-year-old unmarried Manipur permanent resident, became pregnant after embarking on a consensual relationship. Because “her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage,”[1] she wanted an abortion. She had a negative outlook on the stigma and harassment that come with being an unmarried single parent in society, particularly for …
– Riya Tewatia CITATION : Pankaj Bansal vs. Union of India, 2023 SCC Online SC 1200 BENCH : Justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar JUDGEMENT : October 3, 2023 Introduction The case of Pankaj Bansal vs. Union of India (Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India, 2023) revolves around the arrest of Pankaj Bansal and Basant …
Respondents: Union Public Service Commission and ORS. Appellant: Vikash Kumar Facts of the Case: Issues: Contention: Vikash Kumar Vikash Kumar’s arguments emphasised on the definition of disability and its inclusivity. He argued that dysgraphia falls under the definition of a disability under the act. He highlighted that act’s definition covers a variety of disabilities …
Date of the judgment: February 24, 2023 Citation: Writ petition (civil) No. 172/2023 Petitioner: Adv. Vishal Tiwari, AOR. Abhigya Kushwaha, Adv. Sunita Yadav, Adv. Shailendra Mani Tripathi, Adv. Rahul Kumar, Adv. Manisha, Adv. Upendra Mani Tripathi, Adv. Aakar Shrivastav, Adv. Abhishek Jaiswal, Adv. Rajvardhan Singh. Respondent: Union of India and Ors. Bench: Hon’ble Chief Justice …
CASE COMMENT: Shailendra Mani Tripathi v. Union of India and Ors. Read More »
Case: M. Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs v. Mahant Suresh Das & Ors. Verdict Date: November 9, 2019 Submitted by: PRAGYA VAJPEYI FACTS The Ayodhya land debate centers around a location in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, accepted by Hindus to be the origin of Lord Ram. Verifiably, the location had been a point of dispute between Hindus …
(Writ Petition (Civil) no. 55 of 2019) 2022 SCC Online SC 1540 FACTS The case challenged the validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment. The Constitution 103rd Amendment Act of 2019 was passed by the Parliament of India on 9th January 2019. The act allowed for 10% reservation in higher educational institutions and initial recruitment in …
Civil Appeal Nos: 9367-9369 of 2011 Hon,ble Supreme Court of India Bench: Dr. DY Chandrachud (CJI), and Justice Hemant Gupta FACTS: In 1992, the Central Government issued a notification that permitted females to be appointed to certain selective cadres of the army, such as Short Service Commissions (SSC), Regiment of Artillery, Intelligence Corps, Army Service …
FACTS The given appeal arose from the judgement delivered by the High Court of Calcutta in 2015, in which the court quashed the complaint of the Appellant under Sections 379, 403 and 411 of the IPC. Furthermore, the appeals arise from a criminal complaint filed by the Appellant company, now under the control of Respondent …
Birla Corporation Ltd. v Adventz investments and Holdings Ltd, 2019 Read More »
Introduction The terrible episode that was developed around 2002 Gujarat riots, in the Bilkis Bano case involved this woman’s gang rape who carried a pregnant baby and death of fourteen family members including her three year old daughter. This culminated into criminal conviction of eleven perpetrators, which included police officers who participated as well. Bilkis …
APPELLANTS: Satvinder Singh Saluja and Others RESPONDENT: State of Bihar BENCH/JUDGE: K Joseph and A Bhushan DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 01 /07/2019 LEGAL PROVISIONS: Constitution of India, Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016, Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. INTRODUCTION The case is an appeal filed by the appellants (accused), before the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India against the Patna …
CASE COMMENTARY SATVINDER SINGH SALUJA AND OTHERS V STATE OF BIHAR, AIR (2019) 7 SCC 89 Read More »
INTRODUCTION: Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun is a landmark decided by the Supreme Court of India on the interpretation of Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA) and what it means for the right to inherit and legitimacy of children born from void or voidable marriages.Importance: This case is important because it addresses the rights of …
Revanasiddappa v. Mallikarjun, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1087 Read More »
2024 SCC OnLine SC 805 The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Judges: Hon’ble Dr. Dhanajaya, Y Chandrachud (CJI), Manoj Misra. INTRODUCTION The taller, heavier and the larger wingspan bird had the poor eyesight as compared to other bird species. The unique variety of the bird species are to be endangered with the environment. In the …
Date of the judgment: February 24, 2023 Citation: Writ petition (civil) No. 172/2023 Petitioner: Adv. Vishal Tiwari, AOR. Abhigya Kushwaha, Adv. Sunita Yadav, Adv. Shailendra Mani Tripathi, Adv. Rahul Kumar, Adv. Manisha, Adv. Upendra Mani Tripathi, Adv. Aakar Shrivastav, Adv. Abhishek Jaiswal, Adv. Rajvardhan Singh. Respondent: Union of India and Ors. Bench: Hon’ble Chief Justice …
CASE COMMENT: Shailendra Mani Tripathi v. Union of India and Ors. Read More »
INTRODUCTION A stringent course of action curtails the liberty of a person, Arrest is no way exception to that. The notion of Bail is the quintessence of this case. The case was approached to the Supreme Court via Special Leave Petition. One of the spotlit in this case was the Guidelines issued for Investigation team …
SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL Vs CBI AND ANR:ANALYZING THE JUDICIAL PANORAMA OF BAIL IN INDIA Read More »
Decided on– April 27,2021 Appellant- Patan Jaman Vali Respondent– The state of Andhra Pradesh Coram– D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah Facts– The appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment by Sessions Court under section 3(2) (v) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and section 376 (1) of IPC as well as …
Civil Appeal Case No.- 5858 of 2015 Appellant- Rohit Choudhary & ANR Respondent- Vipul Ltd. Judges- Hon’ble Judges Aarvind Kumar and S. Ravindra Bhat Order Date- 06/09/2023 Facts Issues Raised Contention Appellant’s Contention The Appellants were represented by Learned Counsel Shri Digendra Sharma, Niharika Dubey, Mr. Anubhav Bhandari, and Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh. The Counsel …
CASE COMMENT ROHIT CHOUDHARY & ANR. V. M/S. VIPUL LTD. Read More »
Bench- Chief Justice of India (the then CJI) Ranjan Gogoi and members Justices Rohinton Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra Background of the Case The Sabarimala Temple in Kerala, dedicated to Lord Ayyappa, has traditionally barred women between the ages of 10 and 50 from entering, based on the belief that menstruating women are …
INTRODUCTION Marriage, a sacred institution, is a public declaration of love, loyalty and partnership. This comes with obligations and entitlements, which the partners have established. Law is very significant in marriage because it is a social institution and society and law are getting to know each other better. India has extremely complex and diverse laws …
Case Number: WP (C) 906/2016 Petitioners: Vivek Narayan Sharma Respondent: Union of India FACTS On November 8, 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a startling announcement that shook the nation: Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency notes, which made up Rs. 15.44 lakh crore or 86.9% of the total currency in circulation, were declared invalid and would …
CASE DETAILS Case Name: Vivek Narayan Sharma v Union of India Read More »
– Riya Tewatia CITATION : Pankaj Bansal vs. Union of India, 2023 SCC Online SC 1200 BENCH : Justice A.S. Bopanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar JUDGEMENT : October 3, 2023 Introduction The case of Pankaj Bansal vs. Union of India (Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India, 2023) revolves around the arrest of Pankaj Bansal and …
Petitioner: Travancore Devasom Board Respondents: Ayappa Spices & Ors Citation: [2024] 3 S.C.R. 363 2024 INSC 183 The case was first filed in the Kerala High Court, then an appeal was submitted in the Honourable Supreme Court. It deals with the issues of procurement of cardamom and quality control. Cardamom is used to prepare Aravana …
CASE COMMENT Travancore Devasom Board vs Ayyappa Spices & Ors Read More »
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTRODUCTION: Transitory anticipatory bail is incorporated as a safeguard under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, despite the latter’s main focus being centred upon the granting of mere “anticipatory bail,” a rather expansive form of protection. Prior to 1973, courts determined judgments about the granting of anticipatory bail as …
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Priya Indoria v/s State of Karnataka Read More »
(Civil Appeal No 5802 of 2022) (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 12612 of 2022) FACTS: In the pertaining matter, the appellant, a 25-year-old woman from Manipur and a graduate with a BA degree residing in Delhi, comes from a farming background and is the eldest of five siblings. The current issue involves …
X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare, Govt of NCT Delhi Read More »
(Writ Petition (Civil) no. 55 of 2019) 2022 SCC Online SC 1540 FACTS The case challenged the validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment. The Constitution 103rd Amendment Act of 2019 was passed by the Parliament of India on 9th January 2019. The act allowed for 10% reservation in higher educational institutions and initial recruitment in …
Facts: In 1973, the third central pay commission introduced by the Indira Gandhi-led government aimed to standardize pensions for civilians and retired army personnel. This decision significantly impacted ex-servicemen’s pension scales, creating disparities. The “One Rank, One Pension” (OROP) scheme emerged as a demand for uniform pensions across retired armed forces personnel, irrespective of retirement …
VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. …RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 634 OF 2021 AND WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 751 OF 2021 Bench: FACTS: “National Worker Welfare Trust” (NWWT) …
Civil Appeal No. 2679 of 2024 (2024) 3 SCC 563 Facts The appeal in the Honorable Supreme Court is by the appellant who seeked appointment in Pt. Deendayal Upadhyaya Institute for the Physically Handicapped, referred to ahead as the ‘Institute’, as a primary school teacher. The appeal was brought to the court since the appellant …
Writ Petition (Civil) no. 55 of 2019 2022 SCC online SC 1540 Facts: On 14th January 2019, the Government of India amended Articles 15 & Article 16 of the Indian Constitution and added clauses 15(6) and 16(6). Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution give power to the state to make special provisions for socially …
On 10 February, 2020 AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 1036, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 225, (2020) 1 KER LT 810, (2020) 1 MAD LJ(CRI) 378, (2020) 4 SCALE 198 Facts: In the landmark case of Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India (2020), the constitutional validity of reservations and affirmative action policies for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and …
Citation- 2021 SCC Online SC 261 FACTS Timeline of Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs. Babita Puniya Case (2020)- 1992- Notification allowing women to Join SSC 2002- Babita Puniya Filed PIL for equal treatment in PC 2005- Circular by MoD to prolong women officers appointment terms 2006- Another notification was released which allowed female SSC officers …
CASE COMMENTARY LT. Col Nitisha v. Union of India Read More »
Introduction: Facts of the case: Issues Raised: Contentions: Arguments in favour: Arguments against: Additionally, they contend that the program offers corporate donors, who can now give indefinitely without revealing their identities, unfair power. Important Provisions Supreme Court’s Decision: Relevance In the field of Law: Establishes precedence for Campaign Finance Regulations: The ruling rendered by the …
Common Cause v. Union of India (Electoral Bonds Scheme) 2024 Read More »
AKA, THE GREAT INDIAN BUSTARD CASE FACTS: ISSUES RAISED: CONTENTION: Plaintiff’s Arguments: RATIONALE: DEFECTS OF LAW: INFERENCE: Anirudh VG MIT WPU
Introduction The Supreme Court of India rendered a landmark decision in the 2021 case of Amit Kumar v. Suman Beniwal, addressing the complexities of matrimonial conflicts and the legal structures designed to protect women’s rights inside marriage. This ruling provides significant new insights into the proper interpretation of the Domestic Violence Act of 2005 and …
FACTS: The appellant, a 25-year-old unmarried Manipur permanent resident, became pregnant after embarking on a consensual relationship. Because “her partner had refused to marry her at the last stage,” she wanted an abortion. She had a negative outlook on the stigma and harassment that come with being an unmarried single parent in society, particularly for …
FACTS Bibisidhika first filed a complaint in 2013 contesting the ruling of the high court about Mohd. Firoz Khan, her son, and Rakesh Chaudhary. The incident started when Firoz Khan and Rakesh Chaudhary went to a house to look for lodging for an unidentified individual However, when the victim’s mother refused to let Rakesh Chaudhary …
MOHAMMAD FIROZ VS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (2022) Read More »
Introduction In ancient Indian society, the attitude towards homosexuality was very liberal and tolerant. The idea of same-sex relations was viewed as something completely natural and these relations were practiced openly. There was no concept of ‘shame’ in homosexuality. From ancient texts like Ramayana and Mahabharata to sculptures observed in the temples of Khajuraho, there …
Supriyo Chakraborty & Anr. vs. Union of India 2022 Read More »
CASE NAME: SHANTI CONDUCTORS PVT LTD V ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. CITATION: [2019] 16 SCR 25 BENCH: HON’BLE JUSTICE DR. A. K. SIKRI, HON’BLE JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN, HON’BLE JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER PARTIES INVOLVED: FACTS: 1. Shanti Conductors (P) Ltd. (Appellant) The appellant is a Private Limited Company that is registered in Kokrajhar, …
CASE COMMENTARY SHANTI CONDUCTORS PVT LTD V ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS. Read More »
CITATION: AIR (2019) 7 SCC 89 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 951 OF 2019 DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 01 /07/2019 APPELLANTS: Satvinder Singh Saluja and Others RESPONDENT: State Of Bihar BENCH/JUDGE: K. Joseph and A. Bhushan FACTS OF THE CASE: On June 25, 2016, the appellants including Satvinder Singh Saluja, were traveling from Giridih, Jharkhand to Patna, Bihar …
Satvinder Singh Saluja & Others V. State Of Bihar Read More »
Facts The Ayodhya case is a landmark case judged by the Supreme Court of India, delivered on November 9, 2019. The case was between M.Siddique(D) Thr Lrs v. Mahant Suresh Das & Ors which revolves around a 2.77 acre disputed land in Ayodhya, UP which is claimed by both Hindus and Muslims. The plaintiffs believed …
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3382-3383 OF 2019 2019 (14) SCC 1 FACTS: ISSUES: The issues that were raised in this court are as follows: CONTENTION Petitioner’s Argument It was urged by the appellant for the appointment of the Chief Mutawalli in a Wakif Mutawalli, Hamdard, based upon the 1948 Deed. According to the appellant, the rule …
Citation: (2021) 5 SCC 626 Date of Judgement: 2nd March 2021 Court: Supreme Court Case No: Criminal Appeal No. 1348 of 2012 Nature of Case: Criminal Appellant: Shivaji Chintappa Patil Respondent: State of Maharashtra Bench: Gavai, BR (J) FACTS: Jayshree, the dead wife, was married to the accused for nine years before to the incident …
FACTS The President of India on 5th and 6th August 2019 issued two Constitutional Orders under Article 370 (1) of the Constitution of which one declared all provisions of the Constitution including its amendments to be applicable to the State of Jammu and Kashmir subject to modifications to Article 367 and the other abrogated Article 370, respectively. …
CASE COMMENT- Haji Abdul Gani Khan and Another vs Union of India and Others, 2023 Read More »
Facts Issue Contentions Plaintiff’s Arguments: Defendant’s Arguments: Rationale In its ruling, the Supreme Court highlighted the voter’s right to be fully informed regarding the backgrounds of electoral candidates, emphasizing transparency as essential for making informed voting decisions. The court took into consideration two important sections of the Representation of People Act, 1951. Firstly; Section 8 …
Bhim Rao Baswanth Rao Patil v. K. Madan Mohan Rao & Ors, 2023 Read More »
DATE OF JUDGEMENT (HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT) (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 10th May ,2024 BENCH– Hon’ble Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Aravind Kumar. CASE NO. Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.15290 OF 2021 FACTS OF THE CASE The given case judgement revolves around the dispute between Shriram Chits (India) Limited (‘OP’/ ‘service provider’ used interchangeably, here as …
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: J. Prashant Kumar Mishra and J. B.R. Gavai Parties: Judgment Date: January 24, 2024 INTRODUCTION: In the case of Prakashchandra Joshi v. Kuntal Prakashchandra Joshi, the supreme court of India answered one of the most important legal questions relating to marital relations. This case involves Prakashchandra Joshi and Kuntal …
PRAKASHCHANDRA JOSHI V. KUNTAL PRAKASHCHANDRA JOSHI @ KUNTAL VISANJI SHAH Read More »