(Supreme Court in Curative Petition (C) No. 44 of 2023 with Arbitration Petition No. 25 of 2023) Citation: (2023) INSC 1066 FACTS Indo Unique Flame Ltd. secured an occupational offer from Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. (KPCL) in September 2015, and initiated a sub-contract with NN Global, which included a clause 9 for security deposit and a clause …
INTRODUCTION The case of Poonam Sharma v. Union of India stands as a significant judicial landmark in India’s reproductive rights discourse, particularly concerning the termination of pregnancies beyond the statutory limit set by the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Amendment Act, 2021 (hereafter, referred to as ‘the 2021 Act’). The Act is an amendment to …
This case deals with the Fundamental Right to Free Speech and Expression. As the case progresses we would came to know how intricate the simple looking Fundamental Rights are and how difficult it is to interpret them in today’s complex and ever changing social and political structure. Facts: In this case the 5 Judge Constitution …
Kaushal Kishore v. The State of Uttar Pradesh: Case Comment. Read More »
FACTS Application for intervention and impleadment were allowed. Three categories of petition around the three farm laws, them being Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020, Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020, Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020. One category of the petition challenged the constitutional …
1. FACTS Teesta Atul Setalvad, a distinguished human rights activist, has been instrumental in seeking justice for victims of the 2002 Gujarat riots. These riots, triggered by the Godhra train burning incident, resulted in widespread communal violence, leading to significant loss of life and property, predominantly affecting the Muslim community. Setalvad, through her NGO, Citizens …
CASE ANALYSIS: ANJU GARG & ANR. V DEEPAK KUMAR GARG (2022) DATE OF THE CASE: 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2022 APPELLANT: ANJU GARG & ANR. RESPONDENT: DEEPAK KUMAR GARG . BENCH/JUDGES: JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI AND DINESH MAHESHWARI LEGAL PROVISIONS: SECTION 125 OF CrPC, ARTICLE 15(3), ARTICLE 39 OF INDIAN CONSNTITUTION. INTRODUCTION The matrimonial disputes and ascertainment of the legal …
CASE COMMMENTARY ANJU GARG & ANR. V DEEPAK KUMAR GARG (2022) Read More »
BACKGROUND The civil appeal (No. 3148 of 2012) arose from a judgment by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack on 28.07.2010. The case began with Writ Petition (Civil) No. 5302 of 2009, which challenged two orders by the District Judge, Khurda, dated 19.02.2009 and 26.03.2009. These orders related to Execution Petition No. 17 of …
Citation – 2023 Lawsuit(SC) 948 Appellant – CPL Ashish Kumar Chauhan Respondent – Commanding Officer Bench – Dipankar Datta, S. Ravindra Bhat Facts: The appellant was a radar technician in the Indian Army force and was serving for the Operation Parakram on India-Pak border in the aftermath of Indian Parliament attack which took place on …
-Mahek Shah -UPES Facts: In this instance, the SEC’s knowledgeable lawyer, Mr. Joshi, acknowledged that the director had broken the constitution by failing to set aside a minimum of one-third of the seats in the municipal councils of Mapusa and Mormugao for women. He maintained that the directors have authority over the reservation issue, so …
The case of Anurag Soni v State of Chhattisgarh is a criminal appeal in the Supreme Court of India. The judgment was delivered by a two-judge bench consisting of L. Nageshwar Rao, J. and M.R. Shah, J. The case deals with addressing the complexities surrounding consent in sexual relationships, especially when promises of marriage are …
Citation-Special Leave to Petition (Crl.) No.2520 OF 2017 Court– Supreme Court of India Bench: Hon’ble Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Date of Judgement:19 April,2024 Parties: Appellant-Parteek Bansal Respondent- State of Rajasthan & Ors. Important provisions – Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482: Grants power to the High Court to quash any FIR’s or …
Title- PARTEEK BANSAL vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Read More »
Facts On December 22, 2009, Nitinbhai Patel, submitted a FIR on behalf of Ramanbhai and Shankarbhai, they lived in the US and UK, each, in their capacity as the power of attorney holder. The land came in question in which Ramanbhai and Shankarbhai had purchased from Bhikabhai and his spouse Bhikiben in 1975, it was …
Case comment Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya and Others v. The State of Gujarat Read More »
INTRODUCTION In Phulel Singh v. The State of Haryana, Criminal Appeal No. 396 of 2010, a three-judge Supreme Court bench made up of Justices B.R. Gavai, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, and Prashant Kumar Mishra rendered a decision on September 27, 2023, holding that the accused should be found not guilty because the prosecution was unable to …
PHULEL SINGH V. STATE OF HARYANA, (2023) 10 SCC 268 Read More »
Case name: Jarnail Singh and Ors. V Lachhmi Narain Gupta and Ors. Appellant: Jarnail Singh Respondent: Lachhmi Narain Gupta Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Indu Malhotra, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, R.F. Nariman, Kurian Joseph, Dipak Mishra Facts of the case: The present case Jarnail Singh v Lachhmi Narain Gupta is a consequence of series of …
Jarnail Singh and Ors. V Lachhmi Narain Gupta and Ors. Read More »
(2022) Citation Writ Petition (Cr.) No. 491/2022 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: • Hon’ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi • Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta • Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna Parties: Appellant: • Ms. Bilkis Yakub Rasool • Sr. Adv. Shadan Farasat, AOR • Mr. Shankar Narayanan, Adv. • Ms. Jahnavi Sindhu, Adv. • Ms. Shruti Narayan, Adv. Sr. Adv. Shobha Gupta Sr. Adv. Tushar Mehta Sr. …
Facts Issues Raised Is the practice of media recording oral statements made in court proceedings a lawful and constitutional one? Important Provision Article 19 (1)(A)- Guarantees Freedom of Speech & Expression Contention Petitioner: Respondent: Rationale The bench ruled that the Madras High Court’s oral remarks are not part of the official judicial record. It affirmed …
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA vs. MR. VIJAYA BHASKAR (2021) Read More »
INTRODUCTION: The City of McKinney, Texas, inadvertently caused irreparable damage to the home of Vicki Baker in the middle of a high-stakes standoff between law enforcement and an armed fugitive. Police Department of the City used tear gas to force the individual out in a prolonged standoff with the fugitive on July 25, 2020. Unfortunately, …
(15 February, 2024) Background and Facts: The case of Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India revolves around the fundamental issue of transparency in Indian democracy. When presenting Union Budget of 2017-18 Former Finance Minister (Arun Jaitley) stated that after 70 years of Independence, country has not evolved for the transparent method for funding …
Association of Democratic Reforms v. Union Of India Read More »
WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 59 OF 2013 Association of Old Settlers of Sikkim and Ors. …Appellant(s) Versus Union of India and Anr …
Association Of Old Settlers Of Sikkim vs Union Of India Read More »
CASE DETAILS Judgement Cause Title Charan Singh @Charanjith Singh V. State of Uttarakhand Case Number Criminal Appeal no 447 of 2012 Judgement Date 20th April 2023 Court Supreme Court of India Quorum Abhay S. Oka, Rajesh Bindal Author Rajesh Bindal Legal Provisions Involved Section 304B,498A, 201 of IPC Section 113A of IEA INTRODUCTION In India, …
CHARAN SINGH @CHARANJIT SINGH V. STATE OF UTTARAKAHND Read More »
Respondent: State of Haryana Citation: Criminal Appeals nos. 1735-1735 of 2010 Date of the Case: May 28, 2021 Bench/ Judge: N.V. Ramana (CJI), Aniruddha Bose, Surya Kant Facts of the Case: Issues Raised: Code? Contention: Contention on behalf of Appellant: The appellant’s barrister contended that since there’s a chance it was a suicide, the likelihood …
Petitioners: Xxx Respondents: State of Kerala Acts involved: Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, Information Technology (IT) Act, Juvenile Justice (JJ) Act Important provisions: Sections 13(b), 14 and 15 of POCSO Act, Sections 67B (d) of the IT Act, Section 75 of the JJ Act Court: High Court of Kerala Bench: Dr. Justice …
CASE BRIEF (Crl.Rev.Pet.No.433/2022) Xxx v. State of Kerala Read More »
COURT NAME: IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JURISDICTION: CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 701-702 OF 2020 APPELLANT: Enforcement Directorate RESPONDENT: Kapil Wadhawan JUDGE/ BENCH: Judge K.M. Joseph; Judge Hrishikesh Roy; Judge B.V. Nagarathna. DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 27th March 2023 STATUES INVOLVED: Civil Code of Criminal Procedure, General Clauses Act. FACTS OF THE CASE: LEGAL ISSUE …
-by Hanshika Tiwari UPES, Dehradun Facts The petitioner challenged several sections of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code, 2020 (the Code or IBC), concerning to the personal guarantor to the corporate debtor. The petitioner was a personal guarantor in two loans taken by the Reliance Communications Ltd. and Reliance Infratel Ltd. that amounted to Rs.1200 Crores from …
Case Brief: Anil Dhirajlal Ambani v. Union of India Read More »
Date of the case: 7th November 2022 Citation: Writ petition (civil) No.55 of 2019 Petitioner: Janhit Abhiyan Akhil Bhartiya Kushwaha Mahasabha, the People Party of India, SC/ST Agricultural Research and Education Employees Welfare Association, and Youth for Equality. Respondent: The Union of India, the State of Maharashtra, the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, …
TYPE OF CASE: Civil Appeal JUDGES: A.M. Khanwilkar, Hrishikesh Roy and C.T. Ravikumar, JJ. COURT: Supreme Court of India FINAL DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 7th October 2021 LEGAL COUNSELS FOR APPELLANTS: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. Dushyant Dave LEGAL COUNSELS FOR RESPONDENT: Mr. Nidhesh Gupta FACTS ISSUES RAISED 1. Is it possible for the NGT to carry …
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI VS ANKITA SINHA Read More »
CITATION: 2023 (SC) 598 APPELLANT: Rahul Gandhi RESPONDENT: Purnesh Ishwarbhai Modi COURT: Honourable Supreme Court of India DATE OF FINAL JUDGEMENT: 4th of August, 2023 CASE TYPE: Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 8644 of 2023 BENCH: 3 Judge Bench (Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice P.S. Narasimha, and Justice Sanjay Kumar) LEGAL PROVISIONS INVOLVED: Section 499, 500 …
CASE COMMENT RAHUL GANDHI VS. PURNESH ISHWARBHAI MODI AND ANR, 2023 Read More »
Background 1. Facts The case of Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Union of India (2023) is a significant legal battle that centers around the distribution of powers between the elected government of the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi and the Union government of India. The roots of this conflict lie in the unique …
Case Comment: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Union of India (2023) Read More »
FACTS The All India Football Federation is the governing body for football in India. It promotes and regulates the game at different levels. As of late, AIFF has suffered from various allegations of mismanagement, lack of transparency, and non-compliance with statutory regulations. The 2022 case of AIFF v. Union of India & Ors. brought such …
All India Football Federation (AIFF) v. Union of India & Ors. (2022) Read More »
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of India, in a recent case, delivered a landmark judgment on the 19th day of April, 2024. This judgment pertained to Section 7 and Section 8 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). The judgment was delivered by a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, which comprised …
Case Comment – Dolly Rani v. Manish Kumar Chanchal Read More »
Introduction From this, it is easy to discern that the decisions made in the case of XYZ v. State of Gujarat was a call for protection of reproductive rights and mental health of a woman specifically on issues like forced pregnancy by deceit or violence. The Supreme Court’s intervention highlighted the importance for courts to …
Abbreviations: SAT: Securities Appellate Tribunal WTO: Whole Time Member SEBI: Securities and Exchange Board of India PCJ: Padam Chand Jeweller PIT: Prevention of Insider Trading Regulation Act, 2015 UPSI: Unpublished Price Sensitive Information r/w: Read With Facts: A jewellery company incorporated by 3 brothers named Padam Chand Gupta(chairman), Balram Gupta(Managing Executive) and Amar Garg on April 13, 2005, under Companies Act, 1956 …
Balram Garg vs Securities and Exchange Board of India Read More »
INTRODUCTION This is a case commentary for the case in which the appellant is Mr. Ram Kishor Arora, and the respondent is the Directorate of Enforcement. This case was brought to the Supreme Court of India, and Justice Bela M. Trivedi and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma took the decision. The main legal provisions debated in …
CASE NAME- RAM KISHOR ARORA V. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Read More »
FACTS ISSUE RAISED CONTENTIONS ARGUMENTS BY THE PETITIONER (i) Lack of legislative competence since the Amendment Act does not fit into Entry 34, List II, Schedule VII of the Constitution of India. (ii) Violation of fundamental right to freedom of speech & expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) since playing games & sports of skill is …
ALL INDIA GAMING BOARD FEDERATION V. STATE OF KARNATAKA Read More »
Case title: Apoorva Arora and Anr. Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Case no.: SLP (CRL.) No. 5463-5464/2023 Decided on: 19.03.2024 Quorum: Hon’ble Justice A.S. Bopanna, Hon’ble Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha INTRODUCTION The case of Apoorva Arora vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) represents a significant turning point in Indian law about the harmony between legal standards …
INTRODUCTION The landmark verdict in the case of Vikash Kumar v. Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) by the Supreme Court of India broadens the scope and implementation of disability rights in India. In arrange to guarantee that individuals with incapacities can completely and viably take an interest in society, it is significant to create sensible …
VIKASH KUMAR V. UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (UPSC) (2021) Read More »
FACTS On July 1, 1994, the dead and accused appellant No. 1 tied the knot. Around 4:00 or 4:30 PM on July 31, 1995, the complainant received word from someone that his daughter was hospitalized due to a bad illness. After learning of this, the complainant hurried to the hospital with his wife and kid, …
Dated-7th may 2014 Court- The Supreme Court of India Bench- K. S. Radhakrishnan, Pinaki Chandra Ghose ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD OF INDIA v. UNION OF INDIA (2023) Dated- 18th may 2023 Court- The Supreme Court of India Bench- Justices KM Joseph , Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy and CT Ravikumar Facts of the case One …
ANIMAL WELFARE BOARD OF INDIA v. A NAGARAJA & ORS (2014) Read More »
The Supreme Court in Bharti Airtel and Anr. v Vijaykumar V, Iyer has settled various issues regarding insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) that have arisen before the Court of law in cases such as Union of India v Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India. This case comment will provide …
Court – Supreme Court Case number: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1137/2023 References By Shashank Singh Symbiosis Law School, Pune
Bench- ABHAY S. OKA; J., SANJAY KAROL; J Date of Hearing -August 11, 2023 Court- Supreme Court of India. Appealed from- Madras High Court. INTRODUCTION- Union of India vs. K. Pushpavanam was an important judgment in the purview of judicial overreach and overstepping actions of the judiciary to control the legislative. The Supreme Court in the …
Details of the case- Citation- (2023) 5 SCC 717 Decided On-13.01.2023 Bench: Hon’ble Justices M.R. Shah and B.V. Nagarathna. Introduction: On January 13th, 2023, Sikkim woke up to the glorious news that the “old settlers”, also known as the ‘left-out category’ of people will now be allowed the exemption from payment of Income tax just …
Krishna. G 1. FACTS Supreme Court Examines Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Constitutionality The Supreme Court bypassed the specific details of a case to focus on the constitutionality of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Challengers to the code raised several key points: The Supreme Court’s decision on these challenges will have a significant impact on …
CASE SUMMARY of SWISS RIBBONS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. VS. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Read More »
Citation: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1099 of 2019 Judges: CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Bhushan R Gavai and Justice Surya Kant Judgement: December 11, 2023 FACTS The British Raj (rule) was divided in 1947, and the princely kingdoms of India were offered the option to join Pakistan or India. …
Case no. (Supreme Court of India): Case Appeal No. 3798 of 2019 Date of Judgement of the case: 11th January 2024 Bench: Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal Appellant(s): Container Corporation of India Ltd. Respondent(s): Ajay Khera and others. 1. FACTS OF THE CASE: Also to restrict the entry of the containers to …
CASE COMMENTARY ON: CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. VS AJAY KHERA AND OTHERS. Read More »
Facts On December 22, 2009, Nitinbhai Patel, submitted a FIR on behalf of Ramanbhai and Shankarbhai, they lived in the US and UK, each, in their capacity as the power of attorney holder. The land came in question in which Ramanbhai and Shankarbhai had purchased from Bhikabhai and his spouse Bhikiben in 1975, it was …
Case comment Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya and Others v. The State of Gujarat Read More »
CASE COMMENTARY Appellant: Competition Commission of India Respondent: Bharti Airtel Limited and Others Court: Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal No. 11843 Of 2018 Bench: Hon’ble Justice A.K Sikri & Ashok Bhushan Date decided: 05-Dec-2018 FACTS OF THE CASE In December 2016, Reliance Jio Infocom Limited (RJIL) lodged a complaint with the Competition Commission of …
Case Comment on – Competition Commission of India v. Bharti Airtel Limited and Others Read More »
By Priyanshi Ekka Student at Dharmashastra National Law University INTRODUCTION In Phulel Singh v. The State of Haryana[1], Criminal Appeal No. 396 of 2010, a three-judge Supreme Court bench made up of Justices B.R. Gavai, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, and Prashant Kumar Mishra rendered a decision on September 27, 2023, holding that the accused should be …
PHULEL SINGH V. STATE OF HARYANA, (2023) 10 SCC 268 Read More »
FACTS Applications for involvement and intervention were accepted. The Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act of 2020, the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act of 2020, and the Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act of 2020 are the three farm laws that are the subject of three different …
This case deals with the Fundamental Right to Free Speech and Expression. As the case progresses we would came to know how intricate the simple looking Fundamental Rights are and how difficult it is to interpret them in today’s complex and ever changing social and political structure. Facts: In this case the 5 Judge Constitution …
Kaushal Kishore v. The State of Uttar Pradesh: Case Comment. Read More »
Citation – CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2482 of 2014 Bench – Justice A.S. BOPANNA AND Justice HIMA KOHLI In the case of Aureliano Fernandes v. State of Goa, a number of possible flaws or deficiencies in the implementation of the law might be found: 1. Procedural Fairness: There are issues with the way Aureliano Fernandes was …
CASE COMMENT: AURELIANO FERNANDES v. STATE OF GOA Read More »
Citation – CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2482 of 2014 Bench – Justice A.S. BOPANNA AND Justice HIMA KOHLI In the case of Aureliano Fernandes v. State of Goa, a number of possible flaws or deficiencies in the implementation of the law might be found: 1. Procedural Fairness: There are issues with the way Aureliano Fernandes was …
CASE COMMENT: AURELIANO FERNANDES v. STATE OF GOA Read More »
Facts The controversy in the appeals centers on the reservation for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) in promotional posts of Assistant Engineer (Civil) within the Public Works Department of Uttarakhand. The case explores the application and constitutional validity of reservation policies in public services, specifically addressing the legislative and judicial developments regarding the …
FACTS OF THE CASE Katta Sujatha Reddy, the petitioner, entered into a formal agreement with Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., the respondent, for the development of a specific parcel of land. The agreement delineated the responsibilities and obligations of each party, with Sujatha Reddy providing the land and Siddamsetty Infra Projects undertaking the development work. …
CASE COMMENTARY Appellant: Competition Commission of India Respondent: Bharti Airtel Limited and Others Court: Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal No. 11843 Of 2018 Bench: Hon’ble Justice A.K Sikri & Ashok Bhushan Date decided: 05-Dec-2018 FACTS OF THE CASE In December 2016, Reliance Jio Infocom Limited (RJIL) filed a complaint with the Competition Commission of …
Case Comment on – Competition Commission of India v. Bharti Airtel Limited and Others Read More »
CASE COMMENTARY Petitioner: M K Ranjitsinh Respondent: Union of India Court: Supreme Court of India Case Number: W.P. (C) No. 838/2019 Citation: 2024 SCC OnLine SC 570 Quorum: Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, C.J. and J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, JJ. Decided on: 21.03.2024 FACTS OF THE CASE This case revolves on the backdrop of the formerly …
FACTS Jallikattu is a traditional sport that is part of the Mattu Pongal celebration, which is the third day of the Pongal festival. It’s also known by other names like eru thazhuvuthal or manju virattu. The word ‘Mattu’ stands for bull, and on this day, bulls are honoured for their role in farming and milk …
Animal Welfare Board of India v. Union of India, 2023 SCC Online SC 661 Read More »
Date of the case: March 13, 2019 Bench: This case was disposed of by Justice M. R. Shah (Single judge bench) in Supreme Court of India. Facts The main focus of the case is a registered deed of gift dated to the year 1981. The original plaintiff and his brother bought a piece of land …
Citation Writ Petition (Cr.) No. 229/2019 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Parties: Appellant: Respondent for UOI: For State of J&K: The case of Sitaram Yechury vs. Union of India is a landmark legal proceeding that arose from the abrogation of Article 370, which had provided special autonomy to the region of Jammu and Kashmir. Following the …
Court: Supreme court of India 3-Judge Bench: Justice DY Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee and Sanjiv Khanna Appellant: Vikas Kumar Respondent: UPSC & Ors. Citation: 2021 SCC Online SC 84 FACTS In this case, Vikas Kumar was appellant who is a civil services aspirant, suffered from a neurological condition as Dysgraphia which is also known as writer’s …
VIKAS KUMAR V. UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS. (2021) Read More »
Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: Writ Petition (Civil) 306 of 2019 Delivered On: 11/04/2019 Bench: Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta, J.J. Petitioner: Indibility Creative Pvt Ltd & Ors Respondent: Govt. of West Bengal & Ors Facts Founded in 2017, the first petitioner is a company. The filmmakers, who also co-produced the movie, are the …
INDIBILY CREATIVE PVT. LTD. AND ORS. VS. GOVT. OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Read More »
COURT – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PETITIONERS – M. SIDDIQ (deceased), MAULNA ASSHAD RASHIDI, SUNNI WAQF BOARD. RESPONDENT – MAHANT SURESH DAS, and Others, NIRMOHI AKHADA, BHAGWANT SHRI RAM VIRAJMAN, STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH, DISTRICT COLLECTOR (Faizabad), ALL INDIA MAHASABHA, ARYA MAHA PRASESHIK SABHA, ALL INDIA SANATAN DHARMA SABHA. BENCH- RANJAN GOGAI, SHARAD A BOBDE, …
COURT – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PETITIONERS – M. SIDDIQ (deceased), MAULNA ASSHAD RASHIDI, SUNNI WAQF BOARD. RESPONDENT – MAHANT SURESH DAS, and Others, NIRMOHI AKHADA, BHAGWANT SHRI RAM VIRAJMAN, STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH, DISTRICT COLLECTOR (Faizabad), ALL INDIA MAHASABHA, ARYA MAHA PRASESHIK SABHA, ALL INDIA SANATAN DHARMA SABHA. BENCH- RANJAN GOGAI, SHARAD A BOBDE, …
Table of Contents Facts 2 Issues Raised 3 Contentions 4 Petitioners’ Arguments: 4 Respondent’s Arguments: 4 Intervenors’ Support for Petitioners: 5 Rationale 6 Defects of Law 7 Inference 8 Facts The case of Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. v. Union of India revolves around the constitutional validity of specific provisions within the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, …
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. v. Union of India Read More »