Rashmi Singh Negi Asian Law College Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty vs Union of India 2023 INSC 920 1. Facts The case of Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty vs Union of India represents a pivotal moment in the evolution of LGBTQ+ rights in India. The petitioners, Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dang, a same-sex couple, approached the Supreme …
Citation: AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 394 Bench: Surya Kant, S. Abdul Nazeer, N.V. Ramana Court: Supreme Court of India Facts – The case arises out of an appeal preferred by Daulat Singh, a deceased landowner, who gave his son Narpat Singh a gift of 127.1 Bighas of land on 19.12.1963, leaving the appellant with 17.25 …
CASE COMMENT: DAULAT SINGH (D) THR. LRS. V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Read More »
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Writ petition (civil)No. 335 of 2024 02 August 2024 [Justice D.Y Chandrachud, CJI, Justice Manoj Mishra and Justice J.B. Pardiwala] Vanshika yadav and others…………………………..(Petitioner) Union of India and others………………………….(Respondent) Issue of the case: Whether the entire examination should be annulled due to paper leak and malpractice or whether the sanctity of …
Citation- {2024} 3 S.C.R. 317 :2024 INSC 187 https://digiscr.sci.gov.in/view_judgment?id=MzY2ODE&utm Facts— In the case of Javed Ahmad Hajam v. State of Maharashtra, the appellant, Professor Javed Ahmad Hajam, was an employee of Sanjay Ghodawat College in Kolhapur, Maharashtra. Hailing from Baramulla, Kashmir, he was a member of a WhatsApp group which included students and their parents. …
Case comment : Javed Ahmad Hajam vs. State of Maharashtra Read More »
Citation- (2021 SCC Online SC 261) (Supreme Court of India) (Writ Petition (Civil) No 1109 of 2020) Bench: Hon’ble DR. Justice DY CHANDRACHUD, Hon’ble Justice M.R. SHAH Advocates for Petitioner (s) – Ms. V. Mohana, Sr. Adv Mrs. Sneha Bdtwe, Adv. Ms. Bhavya Pande, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Advocates for Respondent (s)- Mr. R. Venkataramani, …
CITATION: C.A. NO. 10611/2024 BEFORE: The Supreme Court of India HON’BLE JUDGES/CORAM: B.R. Gavai, Aravind Kumar and K.V. Vishwanathan, JJ. COUNSELS: For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: S.B. Talekar, Pradnya Talekar, Advs., Pulkit Agarwal, AOR, Sudhanshu Kaushesh, Vibhu Tandon, Madhvi Ayyapan, Ajinkya Sanjay Kale, Shreyans Raniwala, Avnish Chaturvedi, Anubhav Lamba, Mohd. Anas Chaudhary. For Respondents/Defendant: Sharirang B. Varma, Siddharth …
CASE COMMENT ,CASE NAME: Omkar Ramchandra Gond v. Union of India and Ors. Read More »
APPELLANT : STANDARD CHARTERED BANK RESPONDENT : HEAVY ENGINEERING CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. Bench : Justice L. Nageswara Rao & Justice Ajay Rastogi Date of Judgement : December 18, 2019 Facts of the Case In the case of Standard chartered bank VS. Heavy Engineering Corporation. Heavy Engineering Corporation, a government-owned company, aimed to establish a …
Introduction Name of the Case: Joseph Shine v. Union of India Citations: (2019) 3 SCC 39, AIR 2018 SC 4898 Court: Supreme Court of India Decided On: 27 September, 2018 Bench: Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Rohinton Fali Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra FACTS The complainant, Joseph Shine, is an Indian hotelier who lives …
DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 7th December, 2020 CITATION: AIRONLINE 2020 SC 930 FACTS: The case of Amish Devgan vs. Union of India was a case decided in December 2020. This was a very crucial case deciding whether the freedom of speech can hurt religious sentiments, or insight violence in the country. This case revolves around the …
Facts In Ramesh vs. State of Karnataka the decision made by the State of Karnataka on 18th September 2024 is significant; it is, in fact, a homicide case that traces back to 2005. Ramesh and his co-defendants were accused of murdering Babureddy, a real estate businessman, in Bangalore Rural District. The trial court initially cleared …
Name Hira Singh & Anr. v Union of India & Anr. Citation (2020) 20 SCC 272 Date of Judgment 22 April 2020 Court Supreme Court of India Appellant Hira Singh & Another’s Respondent Union of India & Another’s Coram Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, M R Shah, JJ Statute The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, …
Hira Singh & Anr. v Union of India & Anr. (2020) 20 SCC 272 Read More »
Citation: (2024) 5 SCC 1 Case Type: Civil writ Petition Bench Strength: 5 Bench: Justice D.Y. Chandrachud (CJI), Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra. Case Brief According to the petition filled by Association of Demographic Reforms (ADR) in the case “Association of Democratic Reforms & Anr. vs. Union …
Case comment: Association of Democratic Reforms vs. Union of India (2024) 5 SCC 1 Read More »
Citation: WP(C) No. 162 of 2023 FACTS In the given case, Hindenburg Research established by Nathan Anderson in 2017 is a scientific monetary research firm which examines equity, credit and derivatives. It has a history of tracking down corporate facades, crimes and putting down wagers against the organizations. The Hindenburg Report submitted on January …
FACTS The instant case dealt with the curative petition filed by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd (DMRC) under Article 142 of the Constitution. The respondent of this case is Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. ( DAMEPL). Both these parties entered into an agreement in 2008, for providing metro connectivity between Indira Gandhi International Airport …
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd V. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (2024) Read More »
Facts The case of Balram Garg v. Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) revolves around allegations of insider trading involving the securities of PC Jeweller Ltd, a well-known jewelry company in India. Balram Garg, a key promoter and former Director of PC Jeweller, was accused by SEBI of using non-public, price-sensitive information to engage …
Balram Garg v. Securities and Exchange Board of India Read More »
FACTS Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Supreme Court of India, highlighting the pervasive caste-based discrimination within Indian prisons. Her petition was based on her investigative article, “From Segregation to Labour, Manu’s Caste Law Governs the Indian Prison System,” published in December 2020. The petition specifically pointed out discriminatory …
Judges D.Y. Chandrachud CJI Hrishikesh Roy J A.S. Oka J B.V. Nagarathna J J.B. Pardiwala J Manoj Misra J Ujjal Bhuyan J S.C. Sharma J A.G. Masih J Parties Appellant: State of Uttar Pradesh through the Principal Secretary UP Government Excise Department; the Excise Commissioner UP; District Excise Officer/Collector Lawyers: Senior Advocate Dinesh Dwivedi, Advocate …
CASE COMMENT: STATE OF U.P. vs M/S. LALTA PRASAD VAISH AND SONS Read More »
CITATION – Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1011 of 2022 COURT – Supreme Court of India JUDGES – Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Ravindra Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice PS Narasimha DATE OF JUDGEMENT- 17th October, 2023 FACTS ISSUE RAISED The issues raised were :- CONTENTIONS FROM PETITIONERS SIDE :- CONTENTIONS …
Case: In Re Prashant Bhushan & Anr. (2020) Parties: Petitioner: Supreme Court of India (suo moto proceedings) Respondents: Prashant Bhushan (Advocate) and Twitter, Inc. Case Type: Suo Moto Criminal Proceeding Bench: B.R. Gavai J, Krishna Murari J, Arun Mishra J Counsel: Citation: 2020 SCC OnLine SC 663 Final Judgment Date: August 31, 2020 FACTS OF THE CASE Introduction to …
CASE CITATION – 2020, 03 SC CK 0075 SLP (Criminal) No. 547 of 2020 DATE OF JUDGMENT – JANUARY 20, 2020 BENCH – ASHOK BHUSHAN, R. BANUMATHI and A.S BOOPANNA APPELLANT – PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA RESPONDENT – STATE OF NCT OF DELHI FACTS The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India ruled death sentence to the convicts …
NAME OF THE CASE – PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Read More »
Appellant: Sunita Devi Respondent: State of Bihar Judgment Date: May 2024Court: Supreme Court of IndiaBench: Justice MM Sundresh and Justice SVN BhattiRelevant Citation: 2024 INSC 448Legal Provisions Involved: Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973. Introduction The case of Sunita Devi vs. State of Bihar (2024) deals with the …
CASE TITLE: Sunita Devi vs State of Bihar & Anr. Read More »
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 1 August, 2024 FACTS & BACKGROUND: 50% for Balmiki & Mazhabi Sikhs 50% for the other SC categories Recognition of sub-divisions for social & educational backward classes Comparable for SC, ST, SEBCs 7 was ruled for the bench ISSUES RAISED: CONTENTIONS: Petitioner – Respondent – RATIONALE: DEFECTS OF LAW: INFERENCE: The Supreme …
THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. VS. DAVINDER SINGH & ORS. 2024 INSC 562 Read More »
ARTICLE 21 AND ARTICLE 22 ABSTRACT Liberty and detention are the two crucial aspects in the modern system of governance. Article 21 deals with all forms of liberty given to individuals by the law. On the other hand, Article 22 provides a detailed analysis of the arrest and detention guidelines. However, both the articles are …
LIBERTY V/S DETENTION A CONSTITUTIONAL CONFLICT BETWEEN Read More »
About the case A related party transaction involving the purchase of 40,000 square feet of residential space by R.T. Exports Limited and Neelkanth Realtors Private Limited was put out and needed shareholder approval. Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 obliged linked parties to abstain from voting, and on July 15, 2014, a special resolution …
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. R.T. AGRO PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS Read More »
Court- Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Bench- Justice Indira Banerjee, Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Justice N.V. Ramana Decided on: 29th march, 2019 Parties Appellant- Pattu Rajan Respondent- State of Tamil Nadu FACTS ISSUES RAISED CONTENTION BY APPELLANT BY RESPONDENT RATIONALE The rationale in this case lies on the application of critical interpretation of legal principles and …
CASE COMMENT: Pattu Rajan & Ors. V. The State of Tamil Nadu, 2019 Read More »
Introduction In recent years, the surge of hate speech in political and public discourse has threatened the social fabric of India. The case of Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India (2014) addressed this issue, questioning whether the existing legal framework can sufficiently curb hate speeches made by political and religious leaders. Filed under Article …
Case Commentary on Pravasi Bhalai Sangathan v. Union of India Read More »
2023 SCC ONLINE SC 130 DATE OF JUGDMENT: 20th September 2024 A. Velan and Navpreet Kaur for the Petitioner Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad for the Respondent HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwal and Manoj Misra Petition filed under Article 32 of Indian Constitution. INTRODUCTION This case primarily revolves …
CASE COMMENT BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA V. BONNIE FOI LAW COLLEGE Read More »
INTRODUCTION Reservations in India have always been in the spotlight for controversies. At the time of its initiation, it was expected to persevere for only 10 years but it continued to exist and still exists. The 1st Constitutional Amendment provided reservations to the Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe and Other Backward Classes. Then the 103rd Constitutional …
(Civil appeal no. 576 of 2016) FACTS OF THE CASE: – The case, Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association vs State of Maharashtra (2019), deals with the constitutional validity of a law banning dance bars in Maharashtra. The State Government had introduced several amendments through the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, that severely restricted the operation of …
INDIAN HOTEL AND RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (2019) Read More »
Case Study Contents Facts of the Case 1 Issues Involved 1 Contentions 2 Arguments for Petitioners 2 Argument for Respondents 2 Inference 3 Freedom of Speech and Expression: 3 Suspension of Internet: 4 Principle of Proportionality: 4 Judicial Review: 4 Rationale 4 Defects in the Law 4 Conclusion 5 1. Whether the government can refuse …
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, 2020 [AIR 2020 SC 1308] Read More »
ABSTRACT: – The landmark judgment in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) fundamentally reshaped the constitutional landscape of India by establishing the Basic Structure Doctrine. This doctrine asserts that while Parliament has the authority to amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot alter its “basic structure.” This research paper delves into the evolution …
Bench: B. R. Gavai.Supreme Court Of India. Citation: 2024 INSC 215 The case revolves around the brutal murder of Ramachandran and his family, which took place on the night between November 3 and 4, 2005. Ramachandran lived with his wife Latha, their daughter Chitra, and his mother Karthiayani Amma. According to the prosecution, the appellant …
Case Number – W.P. (C) No 577 of 2024 Introduction: In the case of Nilay Rai v. Bar Council of India and Ors., there was a tough test for the restrictive eligibility norms of All-India Bar Examination prescribed by the Bar Council of India (BCI). There was a notification by the BCI, which said that …
FACTS: NAME OF THE CASE: GAUTAM KUMAR DAS vs. NCT OF DELHI & ORS[1] CITATION: 2024 0 SUPREME (SC) 671 NAME OF THE APPELLANT(S): GAUTAM KUMAR DAS NAME OF THE RESPONDENT(S): NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI AND ORS. DATE OF THE JUDGMENT: 20TH AUGUST, 2024 COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NAME OF THE JUDGE: B.R. …
CASE COMMENT: GAUTAM KUMAR DAS vs. NCT OF DELHI & ORS Read More »
Facts [1]In the case of Y. Balaji v. Karthik Desari, the Supreme Court of India addressed serious allegations surrounding a cash-for-jobs scam involving Tamil Nadu’s Minister of Electricity and Prohibition, V. Senthil Balaji. The case revolves around accusations that Balaji accepted bribes from job aspirants in exchange for appointments to the Tamil Nadu State Transport …
Y Bala ji v. Karthik Desari; SLP (Cri.) Nos. 12779-12781 of 2023 Read More »
The case of ‘Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd. And Ors.’ revolves around the Finance Act, 2017, which was introduced on March 31, 2017. This Act made crucial changes to the structure and organization of tribunals in India. Specifically, it allowed the Central Government to set the rules concerning the qualifications, appointments, terms of …
CASE COMMENTRY Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Ltd. And Ors. Read More »
CITATION (2023) 6 SCC 429 DATE OF JUDGMENT July 19, 2023 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Teesta Atul Setalvad RESPONDENT State of Gujarat BENCH Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice A.S. Bopanna, and Justice Dipankar Datta INTRODUCTION The case of Teesta Atul Setalvad v. State of Gujarat is a significant legal matter in the Indian …
Bench: S. Ravindra Bhat and Dipankar Datta, JJ. FACTS The case of Larsen Air Conditioning and Refrigration Company v. Union of India was based on a contractual dispute between the appellant company and the Union of India. The exact terms of the contract are not outlined in the judgment, but it seems that Larsen Air …
Larsen Air Conditioning and Refrigration Company v. Union of India Read More »
FACTS Amish Devgan, a well-known Indian news anchor and the owner of several channels – STAR News, Premium News, and Live India faced a serious legal headache after a number of comments he made on the air on June 15, 2020. In this broadcast, Devgan used highly abusive and derogatory four words regarding Pir Hazrat …
Case Analysis: Amish Devgan v. Union of India 2021 Read More »
The proceedings were under article 136 of the Indian constitution and arose from the interim orders of the Kerala high court on 13th January 2023 and 02nd February 2023 in a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus. A writ of habeas corpus is a legal recourse that allows a person to appeal to a …
7 November 2022 (EWS Reservation Case) Hon’ble Judges- Justice Uday Umesh Lalit (CJI), Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, Justice Bela M Trivedi, Justice J B Pardiwala, and Justice Shripathi Ravindra Bhat Case Comment: In a 3-2 majority, the Supreme Court upheld the 103rd Constitutional Amendment providing EWS reservation. With this, the Court extended the net of reservation …
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA JANHIT ABHIYAN V. THE UNION OF INDIA (2022) Read More »
FACTS An application under Section 125 CrPC was filed by the appellant’s mother on October 17, 2002, on behalf of herself and her three children against her husband, the respondent. She had two sons and a daughter. Whereafter, the application of two children was rejected while that of the third child Abhilasha’s appeal for maintenance …
CASE NUMBER – W.P. (C) No.-001011 – 2022 PETITIONER – Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. RESPONDENTS – Union of India BENCH – Hon’ble Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, Hon’ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha DATE OF …
CASE COMMENT: “SUPRIYO CHAKRABORTY & ANR V. UNION OF INDIA” 2023 INSC 920 Read More »
Submission date: 19-Sep-2024 11:05AM (UTC+0800) Submission ID: 2450211496 File name: CASE_COMMENT_-_Harshada_Rajpure_-_Harshada_Rajpure.docx (19.65K) Word count: 1526 Character count: 8440 1 5 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 6 CASE_COMMENT_-_Harshada_Rajpure_- _Harshada_Rajpure.docx ORIGINALITY REPORT 12% SIMILARITY INDEX PRIMARY SOURCES 12% INTERNET SOURCES 1% PUBLICATIONS 2% STUDENT PAPERS 1 9% canonsphere.com Internet …
CASE_COMMENT_ Harshada_Rajpure- _Harshada_Rajpure.docx by Safia Nu Read More »
Facts Essar Steel India Limited, a carbon steel manufacturing company, produced steel products from iron ore. However, after 2010, the company began incurring losses, forcing it to take substantial loans from both public and private banks. Once a key player in India’s steel industry, it faced financial troubles and was classified as a Non-Performing Asset …
Committee Of Creditors of Essar Steel vs Satish Kumar Gupta,2019 Read More »
FACTS Alok Verma was appointed as the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in January 2017, marking the beginning of a significant tenure that was marred by controversies. A serious conflict arose between him and the CBI’s Special Director, Rakesh Asthana, who both accused each other of corruption, leading to a breakdown of …
Facts of the case: Issues Raised: Contention: -Classification as Distributor: Sun Pharmaceutical contended that it should not be classified as a “distributor” under the DPCO. The company argued that it did not directly fulfill the role of a distributor as defined by the DPCO, and therefore, it should not be held liable for …
M/s. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Vs Union of India (2024) Read More »
Article 105(2): No member of either House of Parliament shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in Parliament or any committee thereof. Further, no person shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of the publication by or under …
Case name: RESERVE BANK OF INDIA v. JAYANTILAL MISTRY Equivalent citations: AIR 2021 SUPREME COURT 2180, AIRONLINE 2021 SC 229 Court: Supreme court of India Author: L. Nageswara Rao Bench: Vineet Saran, L. Nageswara Rao INTRODUCTION The case of Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry (2021) emerged from a series of events that …
UKSC 13 [2020] A.C. 973 Case Heard Jurisdiction of the court Counsel Justices: Type of Case: FACTS 1) A group of 126 people are the claimants in this case and are alleging that Dr. Gordon Bates had sexually abused them while doing medical tests. 2) Barclays Bank plc is the defendant in this case. 3) The medical …
Case Comment: Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] Read More »
By Gargi Singh, Symbiosis Law School, Pune Introduction:- The Ayodhya dispute (M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das) It is a notable land case in India. The Ayodhya dispute had reached the Supreme Court, specifically M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Das. In this case, the Indian High Court, which had a three-judge bench, pronounced its judgement …
CASE COMMENT M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs vs Mahant Suresh Das & Ors on 9 November 2019 Read More »
Civil Appeal No. 1698 of 2020 Judges: Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran and S. Ravindra Bhat FACTS OF THE CASE The cases have been referred to the present three-judge Supreme Court Division Bench. The interpretation of Article 233 of the Indian Constitution concerning the eligibility of subordinate judicial service members for appointment as District Judges in …
Facts: i) The Kolkata Municipal Corporation (Appellant) acquired the property belonging to Mr. Bimal Kumar Shah (Respondent No. 1), located at Premises No. 106C, Narikeldanga North Road, Kolkata – 700011 (the Property), under the authority granted by Section 352 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. This section empowers the acquisition of lands and …
2020 SCC OnLine SC 994 FACTS: “Paradox of toleration is that if we extend unlimited toleration even to those who are intolerant, if we are prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed and tolerance with them. Thus, held, a tolerant society is entitled to …
CITATION-(2017)6 SSC 1 DATE OF THE JUDGMENT- 05.5.2017 COURT-Supreme court of India PETITIONERS- Mukhesh & anr. RESPONDENT- state (NCT Of Delhi) & Ors. BENCH-Dipak Mishra, R Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan. FACTS Mukhesh and Ors, vs state (NCT Of Delhi) & Ors. This case is also known as Nirbhaya rape case and Delhi rape case; On the …
Mukhesh and Ors, vs state (NCT Of Delhi) & Ors. -(2017)6 SSC 1 Read More »
AIR 2020 SC 1308 Writ Petition (Civil) Nos: 1031 and 1164 of 2019 Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice N.V Ramana, Justice R. Subhash Reddy, and Justice B.R Gavai. FACTS: In 2019, the Indian Government abrogated Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which conferred special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. The …
BACKGROUND Case Name: Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan Acts Involved: Constitution of India; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Important Provisions: Article 142, Section 13B Court: Supreme Court Bench: Justices S.K. Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Abhay S. Oka, Vikram Nath, and J.K. Maheshwari. Petitioner: Shilpa Sailesh Respondent: Varun Sreenivasan Case type: TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) / 1118/2014 Date of …
2023 INSC 468 SHILPA SAILESH v. VARUN SREENIVASAN Read More »
The case of Ravikumar Dhansukhlal Maheta & Anr. Vs. High Court of Gujarat & Ors. involves a significant legal dispute that touches upon the interpretation and application of the principle of “Merit-cum-Seniority” in the promotion process for judicial officers in the state of Gujarat. This case is pivotal in understanding how merit and seniority are …
2021 SCC Online SC 1153 FACTS: “Being women at least the sister-in-law and mother-in-law ought to have supported the prosecutrix, rather than beating her and not believing the prosecutrix.” In the case of Phool Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh[1], the Court examined a distressing incident involving sexual assault and the legal proceedings that followed. …
Petitioners: Amish Devgan Respondents: Union of India Acts involved: Indian Penal Code (IPC) Important provisions: Sections 153A, 295A, and 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66F of the IT Act [1] Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna Judgement date: December 7, 2020 FACTS ISSUES RAISED CONTENTION Contentions …
CASE BRIEF WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 160 OF 2020 Amish Devgan v. Union of India Read More »
The Amrapali Group, established in 2003, quickly became a significant player in the Indian real estate market. The company’s primary goal was to provide affordable housing to meet the increasing demand in urban areas. Headquartered in Noida, Uttar Pradesh, the group’s portfolio included residential complexes, commercial buildings, and luxury apartments. By leveraging aggressive marketing strategies …
CASECOMMENT:BIKRAMCHATTERJI & OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Read More »
FACTS SC Verdict: This judgement has thus put to rest the prevailing controversy and reinforced the maintenance rights of divorced Muslim women. ISSUES RAISED Are the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) relating to married women’s maintenance rights applicable to Muslims? This question, basically erroneous, has been raising its head ever since these …
PARTIES: TYPE OF CASE: Appellant: X Respondents: The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr Civil Appeal No 5802 of 2022 SLP (C) No 12612 of 2022 COURT: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION DATE: September 29, 2022 BENCH: J. Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J. …
PARTIES: Petitioner: Indibility Creative Pvt Ltd Respondent: Govt of West Bengal COURT: Supreme court of India DATE: April 11, 2019 BENCH: Justice D Y Chandrachud and Hemant Gupta LEGAL COUNSELS: Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Parikh Respondent: Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi FACTS: Voltaire: “I despise what you say but will defend to the death your right to …
Indibily Creative Pvt. Ltd. vs Govt. Of West Bengal on 11 April, 2019. Read More »