Bench L. Nageshwara Rao, B. R. Gavai, and A. S Bopanna, JJ citation: criminal appeal number -135/2010 Facts the incident took place on 17th September 1999 where a prostitute namely Shrimati Chyay Rani Pal, also known as buri, aged 45, succumbed to death after getting beaten up brutally by a person named budhadev karmasker . …
Budhadev Karmaskar V. Union of India 2022 SCC Online SC 704 Read More »
Prologue: “The stopping of the judicial courts, had been blended, in the minds of some people, with the redress of grievances, considered only as a mode of awakening the attention of the legislature.” We will plunge towards the depth of the meaning of the above quote through the comprehensive study of the recent Supreme Court’s …
CASE COMMENT ON SUBHASH DESAI V. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNOR OF MAHARASHTRA & [1] ORS. Read More »
CITATION- CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10866-10867 OF 2010 COURT- SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DECIDED- 9TH NOVEMBER, 2019 APPEALED FROM- ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT JUDGES – Ranjan Gogoi (CJI), DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan, S. Abdul Nazeer, Sharad Arvind Bobde. INTRODUCTION The case of M Siddiq (D) Thr V. Mahanth Suresh Das & Ors CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10866-10867 OF …
Started – 25 November 2022 Decided – 17 October 2023 Facts : The same-sex weddings’ legal recognition in India is at the center of the Supriyo v. Union of India (UOI) dispute. It is a significant turning point in the legal and social history of the nation, especially in light of the Supreme Court’s historic …
Supriya Chakrabarty And Abhay Dhang Vs Union Of India Read More »
Rajdip Das Techno India University CITATION: 2023 SCC ONLINE DEL 38 FACTS OF THE CASE: The case is between KEI Industries Limited, a company that manufactures and sells wires and cables, and Raman Kwatra and his sole proprietorship firm, which manufactures and sells electrical fans and other appliances. The dispute is centred around the usage …
MR. RAMAN KWATRA & ANR. v. KEI INDUSTRIES LIMITED Read More »
FACTS On 23rd June, 2006, Moharman Lal reported his grandson Shubham to be missing. Shubham, who is around 10 years old, had not returned from his tuition at Variety Public School. His teacher mentioned that Shubham planned to learn skating. Despite searches, Shubham remained missing. On 7th July, 2006, police received a tip about a …
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS SHANKAR SINGH GURJAR, AIR 2021 Read More »
Facts of the case:- In the annals of Indian history, the district of Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh stands as a testament to both ancient legend and modern controversy. At the heart of this saga lies a 2.77-acre plot of land, known by its plot number 583, which became the epicenter of India’s most protracted and …
DATE OF THE CASE: 7th November 2022 APPELLANT: Parties involved in this case were Janhit Abhiyan Akhil Bhartiya Kushwaha Mahasabha, the People Party of India, The Scheduled Caste (SC) / Scheduled Tribe (ST) Agricultural Research and Education Employees Welfare Association and Youth for Equality. RESPONDENT: The respondent side parties involved in this case were the …
The Devilal v. State of MP case is significant because it centers on an Untouchability incident. Untouchability is a wicked practice that has been practiced in both rural and some urban areas since ancient times. The founders of the constitution opposed these practices and even created numerous laws for the protection of the populace. However, …
Case Details Court: Honourable Supreme Court of India Constitution Bench: Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy, M.R. Shah JJ. Criminal Appeal: 615 of 2020 Provisions Dealt with: Section 125 Cr.P.C Appellant: Abhilasha Respondent: Prakash and Others Date: 15th September 2020 Facts of the case On October 17, 2002, the mother of the accused filed an application …
Facts The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) swiftly challenged the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill’s validity in a petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution following its passage in Parliament earlier in December 2019. Official notice was sent to the CAA on January 10, 2020. Soon after, a number of additional plaintiffs followed, and as of …
The Indian Union of Muslim League vs Union of India Read More »
APPELLANT – Jacob Puliyel RESPONDENT – Union of India & Ors. BENCH – L Nageswara and Mr. B.R. Gavai Citation no. – WP(C) 607 OF 2021 Judgment Date – 2nd May 2022 Facts of the case Mr Jacob Puliyel, a former member of the National Advisory Technical Group. He filed the public interest litigation before …
Citation (2014)7 SCC 547 Date of Judgment 7th May 2014 Court Supreme Court of India Case Type Civil Appeal No.5387 of 2014 Appellant Animal welfare board of India Respondent A.Nagaraja & Ors. Bench K.S Radhakrishnan, Pinaki Chandra Ghosh Referred Article 21,51(g), 136, Section 3 and 11(a)&(m) of PCA act Facts This case is concerned with …
INTRODUCTION The British included the crime of sedition into the Indian Penal Code in 1870 in an attempt to crush political dissent. Before India gained its independence, the law was used to silence critics and dissidents in the country, and a number of freedom fighters, including Bal Gangadhar Tilak and in accordance with this clause, …
CITATION 2023 SC 544 DATE OF JUDGMENT 1st May 2023 COURT Supreme Court of India APPELLANT Shilpa Shailesh RESPONDENT Varun Sreenivasan BENCH J. Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Sanjiv Khanna, J. Abhay S. Oka, J. Vikram Nath and J. J.K. Maheshwari. INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court has reiterated the importance of marriage as a sacred societal institution, …
Facts In the year 1999, the convicted around 9:15pm reached the doorstep of the deceased who is a sex worker and live in a red light area and she denied performing, and convicted brutally beaten the deceased in a fit of anger and beat her to death banging her head several times on the floor …
Court – Supreme Court of India Petitioner – Anoop Baranwal Respondent – Union of India Bench – Honorable Justice K.M Joseph, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy and C.T. Ravikumar Date of Judgement – March 02, 2023 Citation – W.P.(C) 114/2015 Facts A Writ petition (WP (C) 104/2015) was filed by Anoop Baranwal, in January …
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction In the Supreme Court of India (Before Indira Banerjee and A.S. Bopanna, JJ.) Civil Appeal No. of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 3187 of 2021) Decided on September 14, 2022. Facts of the case: The appeal before the Supreme Court arose against the common judgment and order dated February 1, …
Essar House Private Limited v. Arcellor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited Read More »
(Criminal Appeal No 1441 of 2022) Facts: The prosecution alleges that on the afternoon of November 7, 2004, the respondent forcibly entered the victim’s home in Narangi village. It is claimed that he physically assaulted her, committing rape, and then threatened her with death if she raised an alarm. Subsequently, when the victim called for …
State of Jharkhand V. Shailendra Kumar Rai @ Pandav Rai Read More »
Independent Thought ….Petitioner versus Union of India …
Introduction The question of the status of the inheritance rights of children born out of marriages deemed voidable or null and void under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA) was questioned in the Revanasiddappa case. The question specifically asked if the children of such parents could inherit their parents’ possessions in the same way as …
Court: Supreme Court of India Petitioner: Christian Medical College Vellore Association Respondent: Union of India and Others Bench: M.R. Shah, Vineet Saran, Arun Mishra Date of Judgement: 29 April, 2020 Important Sections/Articles-Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 19(1)(g), 25,26,29(1) and 30 FACTS: In this case, the constitutionality of the announcements that established NEET as the …
Christian Medical College Vellore Association v. Union of India Read More »
DATE OF THE JUDGEMENT:21ST AUGUST PETITIONER: BIKRAM CHATTERJEE RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA APPEAL No.: 940/2017 BENCH: HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA AND HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT. FACTS OF THE CASE: A writ petition was filed by some homebuyers of projects aggrieved by the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and the whole process was initiated …
TITILE OF THE CASE: BIKRAM CHATTERJEE and OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA. Read More »
AIR 2018 SUPREME COURT 1665 FACTS- One of the sacrosanct pillars of any legal system is the concept of fundamental rights. Out of these rights, the right to life and personal liberty emerges as extremely important as it also facilitates the exercise of other rights. The right to life and liberty essentially ensures an individual’s …
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) FACTS ISSUES RAISED CONTENTION justice. It gives the powers to quash the FIR if it fails to meet the ends of justice. RATIONALE DEFECTS OF LAW Without the FIR being filed or without any prior information being provided as mentioned under the CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, no matter that in between …
INTRODUCTION Date of judgment : 6 May 2021 Judges : Justice D.Y Chandrachud, Justice M.R Shah In this case, the Madras High Court panel of judges made a remark against the election commission and held them answerable for the second wave. The Election Commission sought the assistance of the Honorable court for supervision on how …
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA V. MR VIJAYA BHASKAR (2021) Read More »
Case no. (Supreme Court of India): Case Appeal No. 3798 of 2019 Date of Judgement of the case: 11th January 2024 Bench: Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal Appellant(s): Container Corporation of India Ltd. Respondent(s): Ajay Khera and others Also to restrict the entry of the containers to the depot in cases when …
CASE COMMENTARY ON: CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. VS AJAY KHERA AND OTHERS. Read More »
Court: The Supreme Court of India Citation: W.P. (Civil) No. 528/2018 Coram: Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, Aniruddha Bose, V. Ramasubramanian Subject Matter: Trade in Cryptocurrency in India (Financial Law and Banking law) Introduction: Cryptocurrency or virtual currency (such as Bitcoin and Ethereum) is a digital form of currency that operates independently of traditional banking systems. …
INTERNET AND MOBILE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA VS RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Read More »
“Famously known as REAL SHIVSENA case” Dated: 11 th may 2023 On November 28th, 2019, Uddhav Thackeray, leader of Shiv Sena and head of the MahaVikas Aghadi (MVA), became the Chief Minister of Maharashtra through the MVA alliancewith the Nationalist Congress Party and the Indian National Congress. However, on June21st, 2022, Eknath Shinde, a key …
SUBHASH DESAI VS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNOR OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS Read More »
An election was to be held to elect two members of the Rajya Sabha representing the state of Jharkhand the appellant here belonged to Jharkhand Mukti Morcha and was a member of the legislative assembly of Jharkhand. There were allegations against her regarding acceptance of a bribe to cast a vote in a candidate’s favor …
Arun Jaitley, former union finance minister in the year 2017 – 18, proposed that there must be a transparent and fair method of funding for the political parties. As a result , the electoral bonds scheme was proposed , it was said to be an act that would pave way for new method of funding …
ASSOCIATION OF DEMOCRATIC REFORMS VS UNION OF INDIA Read More »
CASE NUMBER: 1011/2022CASE CITATION: W.P.(C) No. 1011/2022; Diary No. 36593/2022NAME OF COURT: Supreme Court of IndiaDATE OF JUDGMENT: October 17,2023 PARTIES TO THE CASEPETITIONERS: Supriya Chakraborty and Abhay DangLAWYERS: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv Dr. Menaka Guruswamy, Sr. Adv. Ms. Arundhati Katju andors.RESPONDENTS: Union of IndiaLAWYERS: Mr. R Venkataramani, Attorney General for India Mr. Tushar …
SUPRIYO @ SUPRIYA CHAKRABORTY & ANR. V. UNION OF INDIA (SAME SEX MARRIAGE) Read More »
COURT: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Writ petition (civil) No. 906 of 2016 PETITIONER: Vivek Narayan Sharma RESPONDENT: Union of India BENCH: BR Gavai, S.A. Nazeer, A.S. Bopanna, V.Ramasubramaniam, BV Nagarathna DATE OF THE CASE: 2nd January, 2023 LEGAL PROVISIONS: Section 26(2) of the RBI Act,1934 In the year 2016, the Government of India made …
CITATION – 2024 INSC 108 TRANSFER PETITION (Crl) No. – 846 of 2023 DATE OF JUDGMENT – February 13, 2024 COURT – Supreme Court of India PETITIONER – Tejashwi Prasad Yadav RESPONDENT – Hareshbhai Pranshankar Mehta BENCH – Hon’ble Justice Mr. Abhay S. Oka and Hon’ble Justice Mr. Ujjal Bhuyan The case concerns a transfer …
Tejashwi Prasad Yadav v. Hareshbhai Pranshankar Mehta Read More »
Decision dated: 19th September 2019 Bench: The Honorable Smt. Justice P. V Asha A BA student, named Faheema Shirin of Sree Narayanguru College, Chelannur Kozhikode of third semester was kicked out of her college hostel. This occurred as a result of the hostel’s policy prohibiting residents from using laptops or phones after 10 p.m. The …
Citation- SPL (C) No. 12612 of 2022 Date of Judgment- 29th September, 2022 Author- J. D.Y ChandrachudBench- Justice D.Y Chandrachud, Justice A.S. Bopanna, Justice J.B. Pardiwala INTRODUCTION In India, the history of women has been a history of not being heard, one that has come to solidify into a mark of showing respect. This has …
X v. Principal Secretary, Health & Family welfare, Govt. of NCT Delhi Read More »
The Indian government’s Other Backward Classes (OBC) reservation policy aims at giving historically underprivileged populations, a fair access to job and educational opportunities. OBC reservations, which date back to the Mandal Commission Report of the 1980s, provide representation for groups that are underprivileged in both social and scholastic spheres. This reservation, which was first implemented …
Neil Aurelio Nunes and Ors. versus Union of India and Ors. Read More »
Due to the 42-month delay, arbitration was required in the case involving All India Radio (AIR) and M/s. Unibros regarding delays in the construction of Delhi Doordarshan Bhawan. Due to resource blocking and prolonged service provision beyond the limits of the contract, Unibros claimed loss of earnings. The arbitrator first used Hudson’s calculation to determine …
2023 INSC 920 Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud CJI, S.K. Kaul J, S.R. Bhat J, Hima Kohli J, P.S. Narasimha J I] FACTS Since the outset of 2023, this particular case has gained prominence. The case revolves around the filing of writ petitions by two same-sex couples, Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dang being the initial petitioners on …
Appellant: Mrs Kalyani Rajan Respondents: Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Dr. Ravi Bhatia Date of Judgement: 17/10/2023 Bench/Judge: …
Mrs. Kalyani Rajan Vs. Indraprastha Apollo Hospital & ors. Read More »
Abstract This research paper explores the difficult relationship between call recording and the right to privacy within the context of matrimonial cases in India. The use of call recordings as evidence in legal proceedings has become increasingly prevalent, especially in disputes related to marriages. However, this practice raises critical concerns about the potential infringement on …
CALL RECORDING v. RIGHT TO PRIVACY: AMBIGUITY IN MATRIMONIAL CASES Read More »
Citation: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 135 OF 2010 Quorum: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Girish Chandra Gupta & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kishore Kumar Prasad. Author Of the Judgment: Both Hon’ble Justices Appellant: Budhadev Karmaskar Respondent: The State of West Bengal & Ors. Counsel For Appellant: Mrs. P. Goswami Counsel For Respondent: Mr. Pradip Ghosh Acts And Sections Involved: …
Budhadev Karmaskar vs The State of West Bengal on 19th May 2022 Read More »
Facts of the case This passage discusses a court case challenging the legality of modifications made to the Employees’ Pension Scheme (EPS) in 2014. The employee pension scheme was established in 1995 which provides pensions to eligible employees. The Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, of 1952 initially did not have a pension scheme, but …
FACTS- For the academic year 2021–2022, the Directorate General of Health Services under the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare announced adjustments to the reservation policies for postgraduate (PG) seats in the All India Quota (AIQ) in medical universities. These adjustments included a 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) and a 27% reservation …
Neil Aurelio Nunes and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. (2022) 4 SCC 1 Read More »
Court: The Supreme Court of India Parties: Petitioner: Rambabu Singh Thakur v/s Respondent: Sunil Arora & Ors Judgment dated: 13th February 2020 Bench: FACTSThis case is associated with the ‘Criminalization of Political Activities In India’, which refers to people having criminal records being allowed to enter into politics. Criminal records of selected candidates are not …
Rambabu Singh Thakur v. Sunil Arora & Ors. [2020 3 SCC 733] Read More »
Court: Supreme Court of India Citation: Criminal appeals no. 822-823 of 2023 Appellant: Ms. X Respondent: State of Maharashtra and Another Date of Judgement: 17th March 2023 Bench: A.S. Bopanna, Hima Kohli The case involves an appeal against the grant of anticipatory bail to the accused (respondent No. 2) by the High Court of Judicature …
MS. X versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER (2023) Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED:There were two major issues raised under this case: CONTENTIONS Vodafone’s side: Page 2 of 2 Income Tax Department’s, GOI” s (Government of India) side: RATIONALEWhether the contentions made by the Income Tax Department are valid? Was the essence ofthe transaction to gain control over Indian assets? Page 3 of …
VODAFONE INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS BV v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED: ARGUMENTS PRESENTED BY BOTH THE SIDES: Arguments of the Petitioner: [A] The Amendment to Section 182(1) of the Companies Act infringes the principle of free and fair elections. [B] The amendment to Section 182(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 violates Article 14 of the Constitution. Arguments of the Respondents: …
PETITIONER: – VINEETA SHARMA RESPONDENT: – RAKESH SHARMA AND ORS (BENCH – J. ARUN MISHRA, J. S. ABDUL NAZEER and J. M.R. SHAH) INTRODUCTION This case is based upon the coparceny rights of daughter in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005.before 2005, females had had the rights to inherit and own the …
The issue begins with a security warning issued by the Civil Secretariat, Home Department, and administration of Jammu and Kashmir, confirming that they should shorten their stay and make safe arrangements to return. Educational institutions and offices were also closed until further orders. On August 4, 2019, internet, mobile connectivity, and landlines were turned off …
Citation: Writ Petition (Civil) 306 of 2019 The case revolves around the Fundamental Right of Freedom of Speech and Expression, Article 19 (1) of the Indian Constitution. A ban was imposed on the screening of a Bengali film, Bhobishyoter Bhoot (Future Ghosts), due to its potential to cause violence and disturbance. The ban was later …
INDIBILITY CREATIVE PVT LTD V. GOVT OF WEST BENGAL Read More »
1. DETAILS OF THE CASE Case Name: M/s. RPS Infrastructure Ltd. (Appellant) vs Mukul Kumar & Anr. (Respondent) Case Number: Civil Appeal No. 5590 OF 2021 Citation : (2023) 10 S.C.C. 718 (India) Court: Supreme Court of India Jurisdiction: Civil Appellate Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. The case centers on a dispute between M/s RPS …
FACTS Jallikattu, Kambala, Bull Race, or Bullock Cart Race (the sports), are sports employingbovine or bulls of special breeds, for entertainment by the people in the States of Tamil Nadu,Karnataka, and Maharashtra. The bulls or bovines were “prepared” for the sport with crueland inhumane methods including ear cutting, mutilation, and twisting of the tail resulting …
“The Animal Welfare Board of India vs. Union of India on Jallikattu andKambala 2023” Read More »
Citation: Competition Appeal (AT) No. 1 of 2023 Decided on: 29th March 2023 Parties: Google LLC and Google India Private Limited (collectively, “Google”) filed a competition appeal [Competition Appeal (AT) No. 01 of 2023, New Delhi] to contest the ruling made by the Competition Commission of India (CCI), which determined that Google had violated the …
ABSTRACT: This research paper looks into the symbiotic relationship between cybersecurity and artificial intelligence in the ever-evolving landscape of technological advancements. With digitization, there are various challenges posed by cyber threats that highlight the vulnerabilities inherent in the AI systems. This paper emphasizes the need of improving cybersecurity measures to safeguard against the spectrum of …
DECODING THE DUEL: CYBER SECURITY V. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE DIGITAL ERA Read More »
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justices S.K. Kaul, Vikram Nath, AS Oka, JK Maheshwari and Sanjiv Khanna Judgement: May 1, 2023 Citation: Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan, 2023 SCC Online SC 544 FACTS OF THE CASE: The couple Ms. Shilpa Shailesh and Mr. Varun Sreenivasan tied knot on February 17, 2002, in Mumbai, following …
CASE COMMENT WRITING Bilkis Yakub Rasool Vs. Union of India& Ors. (2023) – By Tanya TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. FACTS 3. ISSUES RAISED 4. CONTENTION 5. RATIONALE 6. DEFECTS OF LAW 7. INFERENCE INTRODUCTION Case Title: BILKIS YAKUB RASOOL …PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS …RESPONDENTS Citation: WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.491 OF …
Bench: Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice K.M. Joseph Citation: Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors. W.P. (C) No.225 of 2018, Decided on: 14-12-2018 Petitioner: Manohar Lal Sharma (supported by other petitioners) Respondent: Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors. (Union of India and other government officials) Court: Supreme Court of India Judgment Date: December 14, 2018 FACTS OF CASE The Rafale Deal case, officially known …
Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi & Ors Read More »
PALAK DUNEJA DELHI METROPOLITAN EDUCATION ABSTRACT Energy law governs energy resource exploration, extraction, and distribution, whereas environmental law focuses on ecosystem protection, resource conservation, and pollution reduction. With the virtue of this Research Paper, I have focused on how Energy resource extraction and utilization can have serious environmental consequences, affecting air and water quality, biodiversity, …
Environmental Laws V. Energy Laws A Comparative Analysis with Conflicting Criteria Read More »
According to the special marriage act 1954, a marriage between two people may be solemnised when the following requirements are met at the time of the marriage: (a) neither party has an existing spouse who is still alive (b) neither party—- (i) is incapable of giving a legal consent to it due to mental incapacity …
Supriyo v. Union of India CASE : SAME SEX MARRIAGE Read More »
This case is a collection of significant cases that the Indian Supreme Court has heard in order to decide whether or not to grant those who identify as sexual or gender minorities in India the ability to marry and start a family. A five-judge Constitution Bench, which included 52 petitioners and considered 20 related petitions, …
CASE COMMENT: SUPRIYO CHAKRABORTY AND ANR. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA. Read More »
A contract that was entered regarding a tender gave rise to the dispute between the respondent state and the appellant. The matter was sent for arbitration on April 22, 1997, and the arbitrator ordered the four respondents to pay 18% pendente lite and future compound interest on the claims in January 1999. When the respondent …
M/s Larsen Aur Conditioning and Refrigeration Company V. Union of India Read More »
[2024 SCC OnLine SC 25]. Before B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ. Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 491 of 2022. Decided on January 8, 2024. Following the Godhra train burning incident, communal riots erupted in Gujarat, India, leading to heinous crimes, including the rape of Bilkis Yakub Rasool alias Bilkis Bano. Her family was massacred, including …
This case is concerned with an issue weather a child born out of void or voidable marriage shall be given right to property of their parents or not. This case deals with if an illegitimate child is qualified to inherit the tribal property under Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. And, whether the …