Court Supreme Court of India Case Type & No Criminal Appeal [SLP (Crl.) No. 3995 of 2022 and 13579 of 2023] Date of Judgment 26 November 2024 Bench Justice C.T. Ravikumar, Justice Rajesh Bindal. FACTS Payal Sharma v. State of Punjab is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India on November 26, …
PAYAL SHARMA V. STATE OF PUNJAB & Anr, (26 November 2024) Read More »
Citation: 2025 INSC 735Bench: Chief Justice B.R. Gavai, Justices A.G. Masih, and K. Vinod ChandranDate of Judgment: May 20, 2025 Introduction The All India Judges Association case has been a landmark in the evolution of policies and legal framework concerning subordinate judiciary in India. The judgment in this case, rendered in 2025, is part of …
All India Judges Association and ors v. Union of India Read More »
CASE COMMENT M SIDDIQ (D) THR LRS. VS MAHANT SURESH DAS & ORS. Equivalent Citation: 2020-1 SCC 1 Date of Judgement: November 9, 2019 Case Number: 10866-10867 of 2010 Petitioner: M Siddiq (deceased) Respondent: Mahant Suresh Das & Ors The Ayodhya Dispute is one of the most historically significant and communally sensitive legal issues in …
M SIDDIQ (D) THR LRS. VS MAHANT SURESH DAS & ORS. Read More »
Facts Issues Contentions The argument of the appellant lies upon the Defence of insanity enshrined under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code, which allows exemption of offenders from conviction, as they are incapable of understanding the nature of the act due to their unsoundness of mind. The respondent primarily argued for the conviction of …
Case Comment – Dashrath Patra v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2025 Read More »
Facts Issues Raised Contentions APPELLANT- Sukhdev Singh The Learned Counsel of The Appellant argued that when the marriage once declared void it lost the existence in the eyes of law. So, the spouse should not be entitled to get the permanent alimony under Section 25 of The Hindu Marriage Act because they are not considered …
CASE COMMENTARY ON SUKHDEV SINGH V. SUKHBIR KAUR (2025) Read More »
Facts Issues Contentions State Of Uttar Pradesh Ms. Ruchira Goel appeared for the State and the UPPRPB. Mohit and Kiran submitted the OBC certificate in the format required for appointments to the Central Government, not for the State Government. Thus Mohit and Kiran were considered unreserved. Also she quoted the judgements in Bedanga Talukdar v. …
Case Commentary- Mohit Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2025 INSC 704) Read More »
Introduction The case of Mohit Subhash Chavan v. State of Maharashtra (2021) represents a critical judicial examination of the annuity of expectant bail in cases involving sexual offences against minors under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. This case gained significant attention due to the Bombay High Court’s strong deprecation of …
Mohit Subhash Chavan vs The State of Maharashtra (2021) Read More »
Facts On 5 August 2019, the Government of India abrogated Article 370 of the constitution by removing special status of Jammu and Kashmir region. To preserve law and order, extreme limitations were put on movement, assembly, and communication withun the locale by the government as a implies of preventive measures; an online shutdown was portion …
Case Comment: Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) Read More »
1. FACTS In Lt. Col. Nitisha v. Union of India, a petition was filed by eighty-six female Short Service Commission (SSC) officers of the Indian Army, who challenged the discriminatory application of Permanent Commission (PC) policies, post the Supreme Court’s decision in Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya In Babita Puniya, the Supreme Court …
LT. Col Nitisha v. Union of India, 2021 SCC Online SC 261 Read More »
Case Commentary on the Supreme Court’s Verdict on the Electoral Bond Scheme FACTS The Electoral Bond Scheme (EBS) was launched by the Indian Government in 2018 as an alleged electoral reform intended to solve the age-old problem of black money in political donations. The scheme, which was notified under the Finance Act, 2017, allowed individuals, …
ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS V. UNION OF INDIA (2024 INSC 113) Read More »
ANKHEE CHOUDHURY PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY 1. Facts 2. Issues Raised 3. Contentions Appellant (Mrs. Urmila Dixit): Respondent (Mr. Sunil Sharan Dixit): 4. Rationale The Supreme Court meticulously analyzed the provisions of Section 23 of the Act, which declares that property transfers made under conditions of maintenance can be voided if the transferee neglects or refuses to …
Case Comment Urmila Dixit v. Sunil Sharan Dixit, (2025) 2 SCC 787 Read More »
Case Title: S. Gopakumar Nair & Anr vs Obo Bettermann India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr Tribunal: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi Date of Judgement: 9th of July, 2019 Bench: Justice A.I.S. Cheema (Judicial Member), Mr. Balvinder Singh (Technical Member) Appellant Counsels: Shri Sanjeev Puri, Sr. Advocate with Shri Sidharth Sodhi, Shri Kumar Kislay, …
Case Commentary on S. GOPAKUMAR NAIR & ANR V. OBO BETTERMANN INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR Read More »
Case Title: State of Kerala & Others v. Leesamma Joseph Citation: Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2021 Court: Supreme Court of India Date of Judgment: 28 June 2021 Bench: Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice R. Subhash Reddy Appellants: State of Kerala and Others Respondent: Leesamma Joseph Nature of Case: Service Law : Reservation in …
CASE COMMENT – State of Kerala vs. Leesamma Joseph (2021) Read More »
ABOUT THE CASE:Case Title Mahendra Awase vs The State of Madhya PradeshCitation 2025 INSC 76Jurisdiction Criminal Appellate JurisdictionDate of the Judgment 17th January 2025Bench Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice KV ViswanathanPetitioner Mahendra AwaseRespondent The State of Madhya PradeshLegal Provisions Involved Section 107 and Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code ii. No Direct Act …
Mahendra Awase v. The State of Madhya Pradesh, 2025 Read More »
Citation:(2020) 3 SCC 637Court:Supreme CourtofIndiaBench: N.V. Ramana, R. Subhash Reddy, and B.R. Gavai, JJ.Date of Judgment: January 10, 2020 1. FACTS The Indian government revoked the special status of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 of the Constitution in August 2019. In anticipation of unrest and to quell protests, the government imposed a complete lockdown …
Case Comment: Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) Read More »
1. FACTSThe case of Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India is one of the constitutional validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019. This amendment brought about 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in government employment and higher education. Importantly, this quota was for those not covered by the current reservations of Scheduled Castes …
1. FACTS The present case arises from a private complaint filed by Kuldeep Mishra, who alleged that Sanjay Kumar Rai, the appellant, had threatened him during a telephonic conversation. The backdrop of this allegation involves Mishra’s purported investigation into alleged irregularities and malpractices at a gas agency operated by Rai. Mishra claimed that in the …
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1239/2023 FACTS: On November 10, 2023, the Supreme Court of India addressed a critical constitutional issue regarding the delay caused by the Governor of Tamil Nadu, Ravindra Narayana Ravi, in granting assent to twelve bills enacted by the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly. The Court expressed that this delay caused a “serious …
CASE TITLE: THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU V. THE GOVERNOR OF TAMIL NADU Read More »
Introduction The historic R. Srinivas Kumar vs. R. Shametha ruling, delivered on 4th October 2019 by the Supreme Court of India, is a milestone development in matrimonial jurisprudence by acknowledging the aspect of irretrievable breakdown of marriage. Although this basis is not expressly formulated under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the Court invoked its special …
Introduction Case Name: Foundation for Media Professionals vs. Union of India Citations: (2020) 3 SCC 637, AIR 2020 SC 3051 Petitioners: Foundation for Media Professionals, Soayib Qureshi and Private School Association Jammu & Kashmir & Anr. Respondents: Union of India Date of the Judgment: 11 May, 2022 Court: In the Supreme Court of India Bench: …
FOUNDATION FOR MEDIA PROFESSIONALS VS. UNION OF INDIA (2020) Read More »
The raising issues of martial rape in India got highlighted in a landmark case of RIT Foundation Vs Union of India. The martial rape exception is laid under Section 375 of IPC 1860. In this Delhi high Court gave a split verdict and implications of removing or maintaining the martial rape exception. We are going …
This case commentary analyses the landmark Supreme Court judgment in Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011), which addressed the legality of passive euthanasia in India. It examines the key issues, arguments presented, judicial reasoning, and the implications of the judgment. Facts: Issues Raised Contentions Petitioners arguments Ms. Pinki Virani filed a writ petition …
Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs Union Of India & Ors 2011 Read More »
Table Of Contents Facts This case revolves around the theory put up by the government in 2017 that then finance minister Late Arun Jaitley did present in the parliament about a new law to be introduced at the budget session which will make a case about the funding of elections valid and transparent in the …
Case Comment Association of Democratic Reforms v/s Union of India (Electoral Bonds Case) Read More »
Introduction: The X v. Principal Secretary judgment is a landmark case that expands the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act to include unmarried women, recognizing their reproductive autonomy and rights. This ruling emphasizes a woman’s right to control her own destiny, make choices about her body, and access safe abortion services without societal or judicial …
The outcome of Kejriwal vs. the Directorate of Enforcement will have far-reaching consequences for India’s legal framework on money laundering investigations. If the larger bench affirms the “need and necessity to arrest” as a valid ground for challenging arrests, it will usher in a new era of judicial scrutiny over the powers exercised by investigative …
Arvind Kejriwal vs Directorate of Enforcement (12 July 2024) Read More »
CASE SUMMARY Appellant M.R. Krishna Murthi was only 18 years of age when he suffered a severe accident on the 26th of May in the year 1988 while traveling with his mother from Delhi to Mussoorie. A crash had occurred where the other vehicle was negligent in driving it crushed his left leg. After three …
FACTS ISSUES The following issues crop up in the determination of the validity of the order made by MIB denying renewal of the uplinking and downlinking permission given to MBL to run the TV channel, Media One: CONTENTION PETITIONER (Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd.): RESPONDENT (Union of India): RATIONALE The interim order of the Supreme Court was …
MADHYAMAM BROADCASTING LTD. V. UNION OF INDIA (2023) Read More »
The appellant, Urmila Dixit, gifted her property to Sunil Sharan, who was her son. The gift was with the condition that the son would take care of her and meet her requirements. But the son failed to abide by these terms, prompting Urmila Dixit to move an application under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and …
Bench: M. S. Sanklecha, A. K. Menon INTRODUCTION The case of Ms. Naman Varma vs. the Director of the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Mumbai is a significant legal milestone in India’s disability rights framework. The case involved the denial of Ms. Varma’s admission to the Master of Design program under the Persons with Disabilities …
Citation: Kaushal Kishor v. State of U.P., (2023) 4 S.C.C. 1 (India) 1. Facts of the Case The case of Kaushal Kishor v. State of U.P., (2023) 4 S.C.C. 1, is a landmark decision coming from the Supreme Court of India that seeks to discover that elusive reconciliation between the right to free speech under …
CASE TITLE: Kaushal Kishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2023) 4 SCC 1 Read More »
Case Title: The Temple of Healing v. Union of IndiaCitation: 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1950Court: Supreme Court of IndiaBench: Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Justice Manoj MisraDate of Judgment: November 20, 2023 I. Introduction The Supreme Court ruling in The Temple of Healing v. Union of India is a landmark in the jurisprudence …
FACTS In 1997, a normal police patrol resulted in the arrest of Mohan Lal, a resident of Punjab, the 4 kg opium (an illegal narcotic) found in his possession while in custody. Sub Inspector Chand Singh led the seizure and in his presence with a senior officer found the opium and prepared seizure documents. As …
MOHAN LAL V. STATE OF PUNJAB (2021) – CASE COMMENT Read More »
Facts of the caseThis case involves a complex constitutional dispute between the Governor of Tamil Nadu and the state over legislative and administrative matters.Between January 2020 and April 2023, the Tamil Nadu Legislature passed 12 bills. These bills were sent to the Governor for approval as per the provisions under Article 200 of the Constitution. …
The State of Tamil Nadu V/S The Governor of Tamil Nadu & Anr. Read More »
1. FACTS Chaya Rani Pal, alias Buri, a 45-year-old sex worker who lived in the red-light area of Jogen Dutta Lane, Kolkata, was attacked brutally by Budhadev Karmaskar on the night of 17 September 1999. The attack started when Karmaskar stepped over the sleeping victim and, in the course of a furious exchange of words, …
Budhadev Karmaskar vs The State Of West Bengal 19 May, 2022 Read More »
National Restaurant Association of India & ORS v. Union of India & ANR SUBMITTED BY SONAM KUMARI Course- “BBA.LLB” BATCH-2024-29 SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, NOIDA SYMBIOSIS INTERNATIONAL DEEMED UNIVERSITY Introduction The “Consumer Protection Act, 1986” was enacted to provide for better protection of the interest of the consumers. In this regard, provision was made for the …
CASE COMMENT National Restaurant Association of India & ORS v. Union of India & ANR Read More »
(2020) 5 SCC 1 Facts Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) is a milestone in Indian criminal jurisprudence, responding to basic questions relating to the nature, ambit and period of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The factual framework of the case arose out of a developing judicial …
URMILA DIXIT Vs SUNIL DIXIT Appellant: Urmila Dixit Respondent: Sunil Dixit Court: Supreme Court of India Date of Judgement: 02 January 2025 Bench: Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Chudalayil T. Ravikumar Citation: 10927 of 2024 INTRODUCTION The case revolves around Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, regarding …
Introduction GLAS Trust Company LLC v. Byju Raveendran & Ors. is an influential ruling in the Indian insolvency law that has raised issues with regard to creditors’ rights, corporate responsibility, and judicial independence under insolvency proceedings. This case is an account of intricate financial disputes involving Byju’s, creditors, and other concerned parties, ultimately leading to …
GLAS Trust Company LLC v. Byju Raveendran & Ors. Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE: On November 14, 2022, same-sex couples submitted two petitions to have same-sex marriages recognized legally in India. These petitions cited certain clauses from the Special Marriage Act of 1954 and its ensuing legality. The two petitions were submitted by Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dang in the first instance and Parth Phiroze …
SUPRIYO@SUPRIYA CHAKRABORTY & Anr . v. UNION OF INDIA (2023) Read More »
Introduction: The case of X vs. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Department, Govt. of NCT and another is a landmark case in the field of abortion laws. This particular case extended the permission given for the abortion of a fetus over the gestational age of 24 weeks to unmarried women as well. The matter …
X vs. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Department, Govt. of NCT and Anr. Read More »
FACTS OF THE CASE The Parliament of India adopted the 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019, incorporating Articles 15(6) and 16(6) into the Constitution. Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) of the general category, or those not covered by the current reservations for Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC), were given 10% reservation …
CASE COMMENT ON Janhit Abhiyan v. State of Maharashtra Read More »
Facts The case of Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. v. Union of India is pivotal for same-sex marriage legalization in India. The petitioners submitted a writ petition to the Supreme Court on November 14, 2022. Their argument centered on the claim that the Special Marriage Act of 1954 infringed upon their fundamental rights by …
Case Comment – Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty & Anr. v. Union of India Read More »
Citation: K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, (2019) 1 SCC 1 1. FACTS The case of K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India revolves around the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme introduced by the Government of India. The petitioners, led by Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.), challenged the Aadhaar Act, 2016, …
CASE COMMENT: K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India (2019) Read More »
Facts The case of the prosecution is that, on 12-9-1996, Devi Lal, Darbara Singh along with other police officials were going to Waryam Khera from Dalbir Khera in a private jeep, on a patrol duty, when they reached near the bridge, the appellant-accused was seen coming from the opposite direction carrying a bag in his …
Case name- Surinder Kumar Vs. State of Punjab 2020 Read More »
A (Mother of X) v State of Maharashtra & Anr, [2024] 5 S.C.R.470 Appellant – A (Mother of X) Respondent – State of Maharashtra Court – Supreme Court of India Bench – Honble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud Introduction Abortion a fundamental right which even though legalized still faces backlash due to moral and societal stigma. …
Case Commentary: A (Mother of X) v State of Maharashtra & Anr, Read More »
Introduction The Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) stands as a watershed legislation in India’s democratic journey, empowering the citizens to seek information from public authorities and thereby enhancing transparency and accountability in governance. At the heart of this legislative framework lies the Information Commissions both at the central and state levels which serve …
The State of Gujarat v. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust and Anr (2023) Appellant(s): The State of Gujarat and Ors. Respondent(s): H.B.Kapadia Education Trust and Anr. Civil Appeal No(s): 2837/2022 Judgment Date:21-02-2023 Court:Supreme Court of India Bench:Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Bela M Trivedi FACTS The first respondent, a Jain Minority Institution, operated a government-supported school …
CASE COMMENT The State of Gujarat v. H.B. Kapadia Education Trust and Anr (2023) Read More »
Abstract: The billions of internet users and their data combinedly makes a large community called Cyberspace. Cybercrime and cyberlaw play an important role in the digital economy. Cybercrime is one of the fastest emerging crimes in the digital world. The danger level of Cybercrime is very high and it has become a world threat. As …
Bridging the Gap: Cybercrime Awareness and Cyber Law Education Across the Globe Read More »
IN RE SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT, 1955, 2024 INSC 789 This case addresses the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was inserted in 1985 to implement the Assam Accord. The provision granted Indian citizenship to certain categories of migrants from Bangladesh who entered Assam before March 25, 1971. …
CASE COMMENT IN RE SECTION 6A OF THE CITIZENSHIP ACT, 1955, 2024 INSC 789 Read More »
FACTS: The case of Urmila Dixit vs. Sunil Sharan Dixit and Others is a milestone judicial discourse on the rights of senior citizens in India, particularly under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The case explains the complexities of family obligations, property transfer, and the legal protection of elderly individuals. The facts of the case starts with Urmila …
CASE: URMILA DIXIT VS. SUNIL SHARAN DIXIT AND OTHERS Read More »
PARTIES: TYPE OF CASE: Appellant: ANBAZHAGAN Respondents: THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2043 OF 2023 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 9289 of 2019) COURT: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION DATE: Jul 20, 2023 BENCH: HON’BLE J. B.R. GAVAIHON’BLE J. J.B. PARDIWALAHON’BLE J. PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA ADVOCATES ON BEHALF: …
ANBAZHAGAN v/s THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE (2023) Read More »
Introduction Name of the case: Just Right for Children Alliance & Anr v. Harish and Ors. Citations: 2024 INSC 716 Court: Supreme Court of India Decided on: 23 September, 2024 Bench: Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, J. J.B. Pardiwala Facts The criminal proceeding originated from incidents involving the accused allegedly engaging in viewing Child Exploitation and …
Case Commentary: Just Right for Children Alliance & Anr v. S Harish and Ors. (2024) Read More »
Facts In this case, Shahid Azmi who was a professional lawyer was arrested and detained by the police under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in 2019 for allegedly carrying out a multitude of terrorist activities. He had been accused of having links with some extremist organization and was purportedly charged with conspiracy as well …
Case Commentary: Shahid Azmi v. Union of India (2021) Read More »
Supreme Court Holding: “The principle of equal treatment of parties applies at all stages of arbitration proceedings, including the stage of appointment of arbitrators.” Citation: 2024 INSC 857 Bench: 5 Judge Constitution Bench Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud CJI, P.S. Narasimha J, Hrishikesh Roy J, Manoj Misra J, J.B. Pardiwala J Judgment date: 08.11.2024 Keywords: Arbitration, Arbitrator, Unilateral …
FACTS The petitioner in this case was the mother of a 14-year-old girl, referred to as ‘X,’ who became pregnant as a result of rape. The case came to light when the girl’s pregnancy had advanced to 25 weeks and 5 days, thus surpassing the 24-week upper limit stipulated under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy …
CASE COMMENT ON: A (Mother of X) v. State of Maharashtra & Anr (2024) INSC 371. Read More »
CASE NAME- URMILA DIXIT V. SUNIL SHARAN DIXIT Appellant: Urmila Dixit Respondent: Sunil Sharan Dixit and Ors Date-02-01-2025 Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Chudalayil T. Ravikumar Citation: Civil Appeal No. 10927 OF 2024 Introduction The case of Urmila Dixit v. Sunil Sharan Dixit (2025 INSC 20) presents important issues …
CASE COMMENT: URMILA DIXIT V. SUNIL SHARAN DIXIT Read More »
The case of Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. (2024) Facts of the Case The Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. (2024) is a notable court fight involving the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) and its right to give reservations to Muslim students. The case traces its roots in …
Case Commentary The case of Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. (2024) Read More »
The Case of Manoharan vs State by Inspector of Police (2020) FACTS OF THE CASE: ISSUES RAISED: CONTENSIONS BY THE PARTIES: Petitioner: For a number of reasons, the petitioner disputed his conviction and death penalty. Respondent: RATIONALE: The rationale behind the court’s decision in Manoharan v. State of inspector of police rests on the careful …
TASK 2: CASE COMMENTARY The Case of Manoharan vs State by Inspector of Police (2020) Read More »
CASE NAME – “In Re: Article 370 of the Constitution” COURT – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DECIDED – 11th DECEMBER, 2023 APPEALED FROM – DIRECT PETITIONS TO SUPREME COURT JUDGES – D.Y. Chandrachud (CJI), Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, B.R. Gavai, Surya Kant CITATION – WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1099 OF 2019 (along with several …
Case Summary on the Abrogation of Article 370 (December 11, 2023) Read More »
N.N. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. and Ors. (2021) INTRODUCTION Judges: D.Y. Chandrachud CJI, S.K. Kaul J, Sanjiv Khanna CJI, B.R. Gavai J, Surya Kant J, J.B. Pardiwala J, Manoj Misra J. Ltd. Vs. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. And ors. was a landmark case on pro-arbitration jurisprudence in India. The judgment …
CASE COMMENTRAY- N.N. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. and Ors. Read More »
The Amicus Qriae Durgapur, WB, India Email: theamikusqriae@gmail.com *** Case: DHANRAJ ASWANI VS. AMAR S. MULCHANDANI (2024 INSC 669) Date: 09th Sep, 2024 Court: The Supreme Court of India Criminal Appeal No. 2501 of 2024 Hon’ble Judge(s) :- Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, (CJI), J.B Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, JJ. Introduction The supreme court of India’s …
Case Comment DHANRAJ ASWANI VS. AMAR S. MULCHANDANI (2024 INSC 669) Read More »
Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Criminal Appeal Nos. 3051-3052 of 2023 Pankaj Bansal …Appellant Versus Union of India …
In the Supreme Court of India Pankaj Bansal Versus Union of India Read More »
NAME OF THE CASE: DR. SHAH FAESAL AND ORS V. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. CITATION: AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 3601, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 269, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 933 DECIDED DATE: 2nd MARCH 2020 PETITIONER: DR. SHAH FAESAL AND ORS RESPOMDENT: UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. BENCH/JUDGES: Justice Surya Kant, Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice R. …
CASE COMMENTARY ON DR. SHAH FAESAL AND ORS. V. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Read More »
Case Overview:- Case Title: Animal Welfare Board of India v Union of India Case No: Writ Petition (Civi) No. 23 of 2016 Citation: [(2014) 7 SCC 547] Jurisdiction: Civil Original Jurisdiction Date of the Judgment: 18th May 2023 Bench: Justice C.T. Ravikumar, Justice Hrishikesh Roy, Justice Aniruddha Bose, Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice K.M. Joseph …