Menu

Impact of UCC on Uttarakhand’s Social Fabric 

Publications, Research paper

Abstract

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) has been the centre of controversy in India. People who campaign for implementing UCC focus on legal uniformity and gender justice. However, its opponents are concerned about cultural diversity and religious freedom. Uttarakhand is known for its diverse population and dazzling cultural legacy. This paper, however, aims at, first, addressing the social aspect of UCC for understanding UCC’s implications for Uttarakhand’s social cohesion. Second, it addresses Uttarakhand’s socio-cultural diversity, demographic composition cultural practices, and historical context as these could shape regional dissimilarity in attitude toward the UCC. Finally, it looks at legal, administrative, and socio-economic and cultural barriers.

Keywords 

UCC, Personal laws, Live-in relationship, Marriage, Uttarakhand, Social aspect

Introduction 

What is UCC?

Uniform Civil Code is Designed as a set of laws that govern personal matters, together with marriage, divorce, adoption, inheritance, and succession, for all citizens regardless of religion. The UCC aims to replace the existing diverse laws that vary based on religious consociation

As per the report by census conducted in 2011, there were:

  • Hindu population – 82.97%  
  • Islam population – 13.95% 
  • Sikh population    – 2.34%
  • Christian population – 0.37%
  • Buddhism population – 0.15%  
  • Jain population – 0.09%

Hinduism is the most influential religion, associated with daily life through rituals, festivals, and temple visits. Though, influences of Buddhism and Jainism are also present, be a factor in the spiritual landscape.

Introduction to Uttarakhand’s Geographical location and cultural diversity  

Uttarakhand’s hilly terrain fosters cultural diversity. Major communities include Garhwali, Kumaoni, Jaunsari, Bhotiya, and Tharu, each with distinct languages, traditions, and dress codes. This diversity adds richness to the overall fabric.

Also, there are certain tradition which are directly related with their personal laws: 

  1. Gulaut: Male-lineage inheritance, women rarely inherit land directly
  2. Polyandry (historical): Some communities practiced multiple brothers marrying one woman

Why it is important to study the impact of UCC on Uttarakhand’s social fabric?

  1. Uniform Laws: Primarily, it allows for an investigation of how uniform laws influence diverse cultural and religious practices within the region.
  2. The Uniform Civil Code (UCC): It is like a new set of rules that would apply to everyone, regardless of their religion Studying how this new rulebook affects everyone helps us see if it creates a fairer situation for girls and women, especially in areas like:
  3. Who can marry whom: Are girls in some communities restricted in who they can marry, while boys have more choices?
  4. Sharing family things: Do girls always get an equal share of things like their parents’ house or money, compared to their brothers?
  5. Making their own decision: Does the new rulebook give girls and women more freedom to make their own choices about their lives.

Examining the impact of the Uniform Civil Code on Uttarakhand’s social fabric provides valuable understanding into how legal reforms divide with cultural practices and societal norms in this region. As Uttarakhand struggles with the complexities of cultural diversity and the need for legal uniformity, understanding the implications of the UCC becomes important. This research paper seeks to come up with discussions on personal laws and social cohesion by analyzing the effects of the UCC on various social aspects of life in Uttarakhand, including family dynamics, gender relations, and cultural identities. 

Research Methodology 

  • Review of literature – Read and study books and articles about uniform civil code and how laws affecting Uttarakhand’s collective bond 
  • Legal Analysis – look at the official document, court cases, laws about uniform civil code 
  • Case studies – Collect insights from qualitative interview and various podcast where individual and experts shared their viewpoint on the impact of UCC on Uttarakhand’s social fabric
  • Quantitative analysis – used numbers and figures like population data or survey answers to review how the UCC influence people’s lives, money, and society in Uttarakhand 
  • Comparative research – Draw and analogy between Uttarakhand’s experiences with UCC and with another region as well 

Review of Literature 

History of UCC in Uttarakhand 

The introduction of UCC was the key campaign promise made by the BJP in the lead up to the 2014 general elections. Uniform civil code was one of the main promises they made in their 2014 manifesto. In 2014 Bhartiya Janta party promised to create a uniform personal law regardless of the religion to govern subjects like marriage, inheritance, divorce, and adoption. This poll promise was reiterated by the BJP before the 2022 state legislative assembly election in Uttarakhand. On May 27, 2022, following the BJP’s electoral victory, the Uttarakhand government announced that a five-member committee led by former Supreme Court Judge Ranjana Prakash Desai would submit a report with a draft of the Bill.

The UCC was met with opposition from rival political parties. Congress representatives from the state, such as MLA Pritam Singh, accused the BJP of ignoring its development agenda and instead focusing on disturbing communal harmony and polarizing society.

Inside The Uttarakhand UCC Bill 

 Uttarakhand becomes first state to Implement UCC, it is a set of rules and regulations that will govern marriage, divorce, maintenance, successions, live-in relationships, and inheritance of the state except those who belong to schedule tribes.

  • Marriage: Minimum age of 18 for women and 21 for men for marriage with the same existing child prohibition acts. The law makes marriage registration mandatory, failure to register attracts a fine of Rs 25,000. This act intends to prevent bigamy and false or fraudulent marriages. Absolute ban on polygamy for all religions, terminating previous allowance in Muslim personal law. Bans practices like nikah-halala and triple talaq without clearly mentioning in the bill.
  • Divorce: The bill introduces a uniform divorce process across religions however the specific details of the process are still under discussion 
  • Live-in-relationships: According to section 378 It is mandatory to register live-in       relationships within a month of starting them. Failure to register live-in relationship carries a penalty of imprisonment for up to 3 months or fine of Rs 10,000 or both. And section 382 makes clear that children born in live-in relationships are legitimate. In this bill there is no mention of transgender individuals while defining live-in relationships 
  • Inheritance: equality is achieved by granting equal inheritance rights to sons and daughters. Further the bill talked about specific order of succession for those who die without leaving a will. The order is

Spouse, Children, Parents, Siblings, Grandparents 

Traditional Legal Frameworks in Uttarakhand before Uniform Civil Code Implementation

  • Marriage & Divorce: Hindus had one rulebook that is Hindu Marriage Act (1955) for marriage, Special Marriage Act (1954) or Hindu Marriage Act for divorce., Muslims another which is Uncodified Muslim personal law and specific Acts like the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act (1939)., Christians a third, Indian Christian Marriage Act (1872) for marriage, Indian Divorce Act (1869) for divorce and others had their own too! It was like playing by different sets of rules in dodgeball, super confusing!
  • Inheritance: If someone died, who got their stuff? It depended on their religion! Hindus had one set of rules that is Hindu Succession Act (1956) primarily, Indian Succession Act (1925) in specific cases., Muslims had another Uncodified Muslim personal law, and so on. Kind of like having different treasure maps depending on who you were friends with.

Impact of UCC on Uttarakhand’s Social fabric  

Positive Impacts of UCC

  • Gender Equality: The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) implemented in Uttarakhand aims to setup a uniform set of personal laws for all citizens, no matter what their religion are. certain provisions have the potential to create gender equality and more level playing field for women across different communities’ UCC might influence gender equality in Uttarakhand Here is a breakdown of how 
  • Inheritance: Before, in some communities, daughters got less stuff than sons when their parents passed away. (The Indian Succession Act (ISA), 1925; The Hindu Succession Act (HSA), 1956; and the uncodified Muslim personal law) but now, everyone gets an equal share, which means women will not be left out communities like Muslims followed uncodified laws where daughters often get unequal inheritance compared to men. The UCC make sure equal inheritance rights for women as well as men, potentially benefiting daughters who previously might have been disadvantaged45. 
  • Maintenance: Under the personal laws (The Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 193) Muslim women faced difficulties claiming maintenance after divorce. The UCC provides a uniform tool for claiming maintenance, potentially upgrading access to financial security for divorced women. And women in live in relationships can claim maintenance upon desertion. 
  • Polygamy: some communities allowed polygamy under their personal laws given in Shariya. This leads to women’s financial as well as emotional instability The UCC prohibits polygamy for all the individuals regardless of their religion, UCC clearly promoting monogamy and protecting women from such practices.
  • Integration and secularism: After Uttarakhand CM Pushkar Singh Dhami announced that their state will be the first state to implement UCC in Uttarakhand the debate started over the topic on secularism particularly regarding its impact on secularism. People started expressing their own point of view. Supporters have their own point of view that it unites the country while critics fear it hurts religious freedom. Supporters argue that the UCC promotes secularism by implementing a single legal framework for personal matters across religions. This supposedly removes discrimination within certain personal laws, fostering equality before the law and reducing religious legal disparities. By uniting citizens under a shared set of rules, the UCC will possibly weaken communal divisions and provide a sense of national integration.
  • No concept of illegitimate children: Uttarakhand becoming the latest state to adopt the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) has rekindled many debates and one of them is how will it affect the children born outside the wedlock? The abolition of the term “illegitimate” holds the potential of an egalitarian society but it needs to traverse a long mile to make that potential a concrete reality. Historically, the religion-based personal laws largely considered the children born outside of marriage as “illegitimate” thus denying them inheritance rights, maintenance claims, and sometimes also social acceptance. This legal distinction led to their stigmatization and discrimination thereby putting them on unequal levels in the society. The aim behind the UCC in Uttarakhand is to bring down this discriminatory structure to ensure their equal rights and that their births are as legal as the ones within the walls of a marriage.
  • Prohibition of bigamy and polygamy: It advocates of the ban are also concerned that bigamy and polygamy cause more extensive social problems. Inheritance of family property can raise disputes, and these outdated customs can produce situations where the children are forced to live outside of marriage—even some of the most backward villages still cling to this ancient practice. Moreover, it can help prevent child marriage, which is often linked to polygamy in certain societies. Advocates of the UCC’s anti-bigamous and anti-polygamy judicial policies argue that these may conduce to gender equality by preserving women’s personhood and keeping them from being exploited. On the one hand, this accords with India’s pledge to implement gender justice. On the other, this pledge is enshrined in our written Constitution. But if these practices are forbidden, it is impossible for women ever to be treated as anything less than equal. Nor are wives at different levels! It thus ensures more equitable division of marital property and protection from mental ill-treatment.
  • Registration of Marriages: The Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in Uttarakhand has made marriage registration mandatory. Debate about its effect on individuals’ rights, transparency and social dynamics has ensued. Proponents call this a pioneer proposal. It would streamline procedures and pave the way for societal reform on both administrative and policy levels. Opponents are worried about private life and government control. They fear abuse of power. Examining the arguments on either side will help us to understand just what this new law comprises. Supporters believe that mandatory registration is necessary for transparency. According to them, a unified system would also clarify the legal status of marriages. To reducing marriage to a mere business deal would be against public morals. So, the authorities should proceed legally. Furthermore, by establishing a centralized register of marriages, the law aimed to stop bigamy and polygamy in addition to protecting women’s property rights and ensuring that men do not take on more than one wife. This is also legal custody of children. It has simplified legal procedures for divorce, maintenance, and child custody as well, potentially making them less time-consuming, costly affairs.
  • Divorce proceedings: Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code (UCC) has introduced new regulations on divorce proceedings, igniting debates about fairness, accessibility, and potential social implications. While proponents hail it as a step towards streamlining processes and safeguarding rights, others raise concerns about practicability, unintended consequences, and potential manipulation. Analyzing both sides helps us understand the complexities of these new laws. Standardization and Streamlining Advocates for the UCC’s divorce provisions claim they bring standardization and clarity to a previously disparate system based on personal laws. This, they argue, improves accessibility and predictability for individuals seeking divorce, regardless of their religious background. Additionally, streamlined procedures could potentially reduce litigation costs and expedite settlements, benefiting divorcing couples.
  • Inheritance: The sexual equality solution provided by the UCC’s inheritance provisions is admired. It is intended to ensure that women enjoy the same rights as their fathers. This means they get as much property from their family. Believers argue that this economic independence provides women security and gives them greater bargaining power, making husbands more respectful and understanding in family life; and its principles are supported by justice and fairness. Advocates argue that testamentary laws have been made clear and easy by the UCC, so there is standardization in religious incorporators among the various peoples throughout the country. This could lead to separation of families, expectation, and reduced anxiety in these areas. The UCC promotes mutual understanding among families and reduces the cost of lawsuits in any case.

Negative Impacts of UCC

The people opposing UCC argue that the UCC infringes on this right by intervening in personal laws that are deeply intertwined with religious life and customs, thereby impinging on the right to freely practice one’s religion. They take issue with it because of the way in which it erodes cultural and religious identity for minorities. Critics express concerns that the UCC, if not implemented sensitively, could impose an extra burden on minority groups and encourage discrimination. This is because the current UCC treats all persons differently, and therefore equally.

Challenging religious harmony

  •  UCC was not guaranteed to reflect specific religious practices in fields such as marriage, inheritance, adoption, and guardianship. People in Uttarakhand could be coerced away from their religious beliefs and customs, in a way that suggested force should not be the treatment.
  • Communities might regard the UCC as biased toward the majority faith, subdividing minority groups, and making it more difficult for them to fully exercise their freed-om of religion.
  • For example, Muslim community is allowed to practice polygamy under Muslim personal laws but made illegal by the UCC may feel that it is deprived of its religious freedom.
  • India’s diverse customs and traditions are closely intertwined with personal law. An all-embracing code, people argue, could be considered a form of ‘cultural imperialism’ forcing everybody to adopt a monolithic culture.

Regressive steps

  • Live-in relationship:  Uttarakhand’s Uniform Civil Code (UCC) has sparked heated discussion about attitude toward live-in partnerships. Critics fear it could carry an implication of a moral state so broad that the law could get involved in people’s personal behaviour. Advocates, however, see it as a step towards social order, they say, and has nothing in it to make it sound like state promotion of straitlaced social norms. They may caution us to the contrary: that order will be devoured. Critics, though, question whether it will call into question the principal individual freedoms behind the Western model, and whether such powerful legislation would have clear and even negative consequences. But the UCC’s regulations have sparked severe criticism on a variety of points. Opponents argue that it is a major invasion of privacy and freedom. They contend that the law discriminates against persons based on their character: if these same choices had been made in a different society, few would have any complaint.

Criminalization of Muslim personal laws 

Asaduddin Owaisi, chief of the AIMIM, and other critics claim the UCC discriminates against minorities when it excludes Hindus and tribals. That is why it calls the concept of “uniformity” into question if not everyone is under the same law. Opponents are also concerned that the UCC might offend established religious and cultural mores. In turn, this could mean unwarranted interference in our lives or even violations of basic rights. There is doubt about whether the act will comply with the Indian Constitution. They say it could possibly infringe on fundamental rights and be at odds with existing central laws, creating legal trouble.

Some fear the UCC could breed division and social instability, particularly among minority communities who consider it unfair. They call for a more inclusive approach that honours different ways around the world. 

Suggestions:

  1. Given by Sociologist: The implementation of the UCC (Uttarakhand Cultural Corporation) should flow from a thorough understanding of the complexities of life and the divisions within it. By this is meant allowing for the differences in society and recognizing different perspectives of things in different communities, so that there is a UCC to fit each place and nobody is out of place. In implementing a UCC it is Possible to consider different requirements of populations. We do not want a one-size-fits-all approach. It is not enough merely to pass UCC laws without also dealing with the underlying social and economic structures.  Better education and healthcare and some investment in start-up businesses. Redistricting would help. Better infrastructure, why does it take always have to be the motorway that brings modernization? All such measures will surely contribute to reducing the constant stimuli stressing people in minority communities. (This could well be the principle that underlay the commission. A type of breaking glass?) The UCC should be implemented in a transparent manner, accountable to the public. This means giving a clear understanding of the law and what it means. The law should allow people a voice and a means to express their views on it.
  1. Given by Political theorist

The UCC should proceed from the basic requirement for equality and justice. This means that no matter what one’s religious belief, he is treated the same under the law of the land. The UCC should be in line with the Indian Constitution, which assures religious freedom, among other fundamental human rights.

The UCC should be so constructed that it benefits social harmony and national unity. This is to say, we must not have policies that will fan the flames of religious and cultural dissention. The UCC should be implemented in a way that is considerate of ALL religions. This means all must avoid words, acts and thought that might be seen as discriminatory.

The UCC should be implemented in a way that is practical and effective. It means guarantee that the law is written clearly and concisely.

Conclusion 

Picture a statute which colours India vividly with the hues of fairness and justice. Under it, everyone takes shelter in the same umbrella: believers and non-believers alike. This is the concept of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), as drawn by the author.

It is not that this proposed code would ignore different religions. It will be the article guaranteed by the Constitution freedom of religion, dancing with elegance and dignity, mindful of the special qualities inherent in each faith. Just as a great conductor can blend them into harmony, so too will the UCC try to reconcile and combine these. In doing so, it will surely construct a canvas of social harmony and national unity. 

But how will this be achieved? Perfunctory stomping will not work; but thinking and weighing the matter over carefully. The UCC will answer to the sighs of all religions, attention to all at once; there will be no discordance. Think of the UCC as a grand symphony, with every instrument having a voice melting perfectly into harmony. It should be written in an exact and direct manner so that it can be easily carried out. It is like sheet music-everyone can read and understand it, to harmonize all players. The path to executing the UCC may be tortuous, but the author predicts a bright future. In a future where equality and respect move in step, a much more united India.

Om Deshmukh

ILS law college, pune