Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Intellectual Property Law


Artificial intelligence (AI) has exploded from science fiction to reality, impacting nearly every field, and intellectual property (IP) rights are no exception. This powerful tool presents a double-edged sword for IP. AI can revolutionize patent searches with faster and more accurate results, and even help sort and analyse inventions, identifying similar existing patents. However, this very technology might pose a threat to the heart of IP: innovation and creativity. This paper will explore the impact of AI on IP, examining both its potential benefits and drawbacks. We will delve into how AI affects creativity and innovation in the IP landscape, explore its future potential in this field, and analyse the specific considerations for AI’s impact on copyright, patents, and traditional knowledge. By understanding these issues, we can gain a clearer picture of how AI will shape the future of intellectual property.


Artificial Intelligence, Intellectual property law, Patent, Copyright, Trademark, Trademark secret


The very essence of intellectual property (IP) law is rooted in human ingenuity. Copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets all exist to protect the fruits of human creativity and inventiveness. However, the landscape of innovation is undergoing a seismic shift with the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). AI systems are no longer confined to the realm of science fiction, they are rapidly becoming capable of generating creative content, designing inventions, and analysing vast amounts of data with unprecedented speed and accuracy. This transformative technology presents both exciting opportunities and significant challenges for the established framework of intellectual property law.

Intellectual property refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions, literary and artistic works, design, symbols, names and images used in commerce. It is protected by law through patent, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, which enable creators and owners to have exclusive rights to their creation. Intellectual property rights allow creators to benefit financially from their work or invention and they provide incentives for innovation and creativity by ensuring that creators can control and profit from their creations for a certain period.

There are different types of intellectual property

  • Patents: it protects new inventions and ideas for a set time.
  • Copyrights: guard original creative works like, books, music and art.
  • Trademarks: secure names, logos, and symbols that identify products or services.
  • Trade secrets: keep valuable business confidential
  • Industrial design: safeguard the appearance or design of a product.
  • Plant variety protection: grants exclusive rights to breeders of new plant varieties.

This paper delves into this new frontier, exploring the intricate relationship between AI and IP law. We will dissect the fundamental questions that arise when AI becomes a player in the realm of creativity and innovation. The impact of AI on IP law extends beyond challenges.

Research Methodology

This paper is of descriptive nature and the research is based on secondary sources for the deep analysis of the impact of Artificial intelligence on intellectual property law in India. Secondary sources of information like newspaper, journals and websites are used for the research.

Review of Literature

In the past few years, we have seen rampant growth of Artificial Intelligence (referred to as AI in this paper) and it is something which is capable of performing simple tasks like doing calculations to really complex tasks. The desire to reward creativity and innovation has fuelled the development of intellectual property rights over centuries. While the idea of protecting intellectual creations has roots in ancient times, the formal system of IP rights truly began to solidify during the Renaissance, particularly with the invention of the printing press.

Copyright law safeguards the rights of creators over their creative expressions. This protection extends to a wide range of works, including literary creations (novels, poems, etc.), artistic endeavours (paintings, sculptures, etc.), and various media formats (films, music, computer programs, etc.). Even informative materials like databases and technical drawings fall under copyright’s umbrella.

A key issue in copyright law is determining authorship for AI-generated works. Traditionally, copyright law has been based on the premise of human authorship, with legal systems attributing rights to individuals or entities that create original works (Ginsburg, 2018)

The race for AI dominance extends beyond just technological innovation and investment. Different jurisdictions are grappling with establishing the best governance frameworks for this powerful technology.  Implementing effective AI laws isn’t just about economic competitiveness, it’s crucial for ensuring AI development aligns with societal good and minimizes potential harm.

Like any technology, AI carries risks. From manipulative political campaigns and market disruptions to existential threats, some experts warn of AI’s potential dangers.  Therefore, establishing clear legal frameworks is paramount to guide responsible AI development and safeguard society’s well-being.

Historical Perspective of intellectual property rights

Historical evolution of intellectual property rights and AI technologies, the concept of intellectual property (IP) rights, though crucial in today’s world, has a surprisingly long history. It’s not a recent invention to protect the fruits of creativity and innovation. Here’s a glimpse into its fascinating evolution:

  • Early Traces (600 BCE): While the formal system came later, some argue the seeds of IP were sown as early as 6th century BCE. Legends suggest that Sybaris, a city in ancient Greece, granted bakers a one-year monopoly over their new culinary creations.
  • Renaissance and the Printing Press (15th-16th centuries): The arrival of the printing press in the Renaissance era marked a turning point. The need to protect the works of authors and publishers spurred the development of the first copyright laws. These laws aimed to incentivize creativity by granting exclusive rights to reproduce works (Sully, 1997).
  • Industrial Revolution (18th-19th centuries): The Industrial Revolution fueled the fire of innovation, leading to the rise of patents. These legal mechanisms granted inventors exclusive rights to their inventions for a limited period, promoting further progress in technology and design.
  • Trademarks Emerge: Alongside patents, trademarks emerged to safeguard brand identity in a rapidly industrializing marketplace. These laws protected logos, symbols, and brand names, allowing consumers to easily identify the source of goods.
  • Globalization and International Efforts (19th century onwards): As trade and commerce became increasingly globalized, the need for harmonized IP laws across borders became apparent. International treaties and organizations like the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) were established to ensure consistent protection for intellectual property rights around the world.

This historical perspective highlights the ongoing development of IP law. It has constantly adapted to meet the needs of different eras, from protecting literary works to safeguarding groundbreaking inventions. However, the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in recent times presents a new challenge, demanding a revaluation of how intellectual property rights will be applied in this new technological landscape.

With AI’s growing sophistication and ability to produce creative outputs, a critical question emerges: how will intellectual property rights adapt to this new reality? While copyright, patents, and trademarks were designed for human creators, can the same legal frameworks effectively address AI-generated inventions, artworks, and designs? The challenge lies in several areas. Firstly, authorship becomes murky. Traditionally, copyright protects an author’s original expression of ideas. Can AI, lacking sentience and independent thought, be considered an author? Secondly, patent law hinges on the concept of inventive step, a non-obvious solution to a technical problem. Can AI’s output, often the result of complex algorithms sifting through vast datasets, meet this standard of human ingenuity? Finally, ownership of AI-generated works becomes a point of contention. Should the programmer, the company that owns the AI, or the entity that provided the training data be recognized as the rights holder? This interplay between AI and intellectual property law is a complex and evolving issue that demands further exploration, with significant implications for fostering innovation in the age of artificial intelligence.

Future of artificial intelligence

AI’s capabilities are rapidly expanding, blurring the lines between human and machine intelligence. While the potential seems limitless, from automating complex tasks to revolutionizing scientific discovery, we can’t ignore the inherent risks.  Machines, unlike humans, lack inherent understanding or foresight. There have been cases where AI systems deviated from their programming, raising concerns about controllability.  Imagine an AI designed to optimize traffic flow, but it starts prioritizing speed over safety.  The future of AI development hinges on addressing these ambiguities. We need a clear roadmap outlining the appropriate boundaries for AI’s role in human life and innovation. This roadmap should prioritize safety, transparency, and human oversight. Only then can we ensure AI’s safe and beneficial integration into our society.

AI & Copyright

Copyright traditionally protects original works created by humans, encompassing everything from novels to software. The intersection of AI and copyright isn’t new, but with older AI tools, the issue of ownership was clear. These tools functioned as extensions of the programmer, like a pen and paper. The creative spark belonged to the human. However, with the rise of sophisticated AI capable of independent creation, the question of copyright ownership becomes murky. Should the rights belong to the programmer, the AI itself, or some combination? Machine learning, a subset of AI, involves feeding data to machines that then generate original works seemingly independent of human input. This advancement in AI has introduced significant copyright ambiguities. Without clear legal guidelines, disputes over ownership are likely to become increasingly common.

AI & Patent

The growing sophistication of AI is raising crucial questions about patent law. While AI offers tremendous potential for patent research, search tools, and early invention validation, its ability to create independently throws a wrench into traditional ownership models. Patents reward innovation, and AI is now reaching a point where it can invent without human input. This necessitates a closer look at specific areas:

Weapons: The use of AI in warfare raises international humanitarian law concerns (beyond the scope of this paper), but who gets the patent for an AI-created weapon remains unclear.

Medicine/Pharma: Patent rights in the crucial field of medicine become murky when AI develops a lifesaving drug. Who owns the patent for a vaccine invented by AI – the machine, its programmer, or the purchaser? Unresolved ownership could hinder vaccine distribution and affordability.

Road Safety: As AI tackles road safety challenges, inventions like self-driving cars raise patent questions. Companies like Microsoft are already developing AI-powered driver monitoring systems. Who owns the patent – the programmer, the car manufacturer, or even the AI itself?

New Technologies: Patent law hinges on invention. As AI’s creative capabilities expand, a clear picture regarding ownership of AI-generated inventions is paramount.

New wrenches into the existing IP system

For trademarks, AI-generated marketing materials raise concerns about unintentional infringement and brand deception. AI’s ability to mimic human creativity also challenges the current definition of authorship in copyright law. These complexities highlight the urgent need for legal frameworks that can adapt to the realities of AI. This might involve redefining authorship for AI’s unique contributions, establishing international standards for AI-related IP, and fostering transparency in AI development to address ownership disputes. The interplay between AI and intellectual property law is a complex and evolving issue that demands further exploration, with significant implications for fostering innovation in the age of artificial intelligence.

Patent Disclosure Issues Relating to AI

Securing patent protection for AI inventions can be tricky due to disclosure requirements. Patent law offers a temporary monopoly on an invention in exchange for publicly disclosing it. This allows others to understand and potentially build upon the invention.

However, some AI inventions pose challenges in meeting this disclosure requirement. Here’s why:

Rule-based AI:  Imagine a research team invents a set of rules for a specific AI application. Patenting a broader application of these rules might not be possible because the original rules wouldn’t enable someone to practice the broader invention. Disclosing only the specific rules might not be enough either.

Neural networks:  The effectiveness of AI in these networks depends on intricate details like network structure, training data, and algorithms. The scope of a patent hinges on what these limited details teach others about using the invention.

In both scenarios, the question arises:  Does the patent provide enough generalizable knowledge to support the desired scope of the claim?  There could be countless variations of the network architecture or rules that work for different applications. Disclosing just a few and claiming a broad scope is risky. Disclosing many variations might be safer, but how many are practical?

The pharmaceutical industry might offer some guidance here. Their experience with patent disclosure and written description requirements could be valuable in understanding how much information needs to be revealed for AI inventions.

1)The UK Intellectual Property Office’s Decision on DABUS:

Similarly, in the UK, patent applications listing DABUS as the inventor were refused.  The UK court emphasized that an ‘inventor’ must be a person, which was upheld by the Court of Appeal (Dabus, 2022).

2)Warner Music’s Copyright of AI-Generated Music:

Warner Music signed a deal with an AI-driven music creation startup, highlighting

the commercial interest in AI-generated works and raising questions about the

copyrightability of such creations.

3)Google’s ‘Project Nightingale’ and Data Privacy:

Although not a direct AI-IP case, Google’s healthcare data collection project raises questions about the ownership and use of data, a key component in AI development, relevant to IP considerations (Schneble et al., 2020).



As AI gets better at creative tasks, there will be a surge in AI-generated art, music, and literature. This raises questions about copyright ownership. Can AI itself be considered an author? Who owns the rights – the programmer, the company, or no one? How will “fair use” apply to AI-generated content that incorporates elements of copyrighted works? Humans and AI might increasingly collaborate on creative projects. This necessitates new legal frameworks to determine how copyright ownership is split between human and AI contributions. AI can be a powerful tool for copyright holders. AI-powered systems can scan vast amounts of data to identify and fight copyright infringement more efficiently.


AI can analyse vast datasets to identify problems and suggest potential solutions. This could accelerate innovation and lead to a rise in AI-assisted inventions. However, patent law might need to adapt to address the question of inventorship for AI-generated inventions.AI could be used to analyse patent landscapes and strategically file patents to protect inventions. This could lead to a more complex and competitive patent environment. The very definition of “inventive step” in patent law might need to be reevaluated as AI becomes more sophisticated. Can the non-obvious solutions identified by AI algorithms meet the current human ingenuity standard for patentability?


As AI takes on a greater role in marketing campaigns, there’s a risk of unintentional trademark infringement. Can AI be programmed to understand and avoid using trademarked terms in a way that infringes on another brand?

As AI gets better at mimicking human behaviour, there’s a potential for creating deceptive marketing materials using AI-generated voices or likenesses. Trademark law might need to address situations where AI is used to mislead consumers about the source of a product.

Overall Impact

The global nature of AI development necessitates international collaboration on legal frameworks for AI and IP. This will ensure consistency and avoid a fragmented legal landscape that hinders innovation. Increased transparency about the training data and algorithms used in AI can help address ownership disputes and copyright infringement. The legal system will need to adapt to keep pace with the rapid advancements in AI. This might involve creating new legal categories for AI-generated works and inventions, as well as revising existing IP laws to address the unique challenges posed by AI. These are just some potential ways AI will impact intellectual property. As AI technology continues to evolve, the interplay between AI and IP law will undoubtedly become even more complex and fascinating.


The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents a multifaceted challenge and opportunity for the realm of intellectual property. While AI offers exciting possibilities for innovation and content creation, it also throws wrenches into the established legal frameworks of copyright, patents, and trademarks. The ability of AI to generate creative outputs blurs the lines of authorship, raising questions about who owns AI-generated works and how such creations can be protected. Patent law might need to grapple with the concept of AI-assisted inventions and how they fit into the criteria for patentability. Trademark law faces challenges in a world where AI creates marketing materials, potentially leading to unintentional infringement or even deceptive marketing tactics.

However, the impact of AI on IP extends beyond legal hurdles. The very essence of creativity, traditionally a human domain, is now being challenged by AI’s capabilities. This necessitates a deeper conversation about the role of AI in the creative process and the potential for human-AI collaboration to push the boundaries of innovation. Furthermore, the ethical considerations surrounding AI use within IP cannot be ignored. Bias in training data can lead to discriminatory AI outputs, and the potential for AI to be used for malicious purposes like plagiarism or deepfakes requires careful consideration.

To navigate these complexities, international collaboration and ongoing legal adaptations are crucial. Developing clear standards for AI and IP will foster innovation while ensuring fairness and protecting existing intellectual property rights. Transparency in AI development and a willingness to adapt legal frameworks will be key in shaping a future where AI and IP can coexist and thrive together. Ultimately, the impact of AI on intellectual property will depend on our ability to harness its potential for good while mitigating the risks. This necessitates a collaborative effort from legal professionals, policymakers, AI developers, and the creative community to ensure that AI becomes a force for positive change in the intellectual property landscape.


  1. LinkedIn, (2024), (last visited Apr 14, 2024).
  2. Sagar Kishor Savale, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR), ResearchGate (2018), (last visited Apr 14, 2024).
  3. View of The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Intellectual Property Rights, (2024), (last visited Apr 14, 2024).
  4. Intellectual Property Protection for Artificial Intelligence, Finnegan | Leading IP+ Law Firm (2017), (last visited Apr 14, 2024).
  5. View of Artificial Intelligence and its impact on Intellectual Property Law, (2024), (last visited Apr 14, 2024).
  6. Ryan Abbott, Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence (2022),$002f9781800881907$002fbook-part-9781800881907-6.xml?t:ac=book%24002f9781800881907%24002fbook-part-9781800881907-6.xml (last visited Apr 14, 2024).

Name: Rafiya Tabasum (3rd year 6th semester)

College name: Presidency university, Bangalore