ABSTRACT: This paper delves into the profound impact of social media on legal decision-making, highlighting its role in shaping public opinion, influencing legal proceedings, and raising awareness. It discusses how platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have become integral to daily life, facilitating real-time communication and the sharing of information. The evolution of social media from its early days, akin to graffiti, to its current diverse forms is examined, emphasizing its function as a digital medium for expression. It analyzes the challenges posed by social media, such as the spread of misinformation and bias, and suggests strategies to mitigate these risks, including public education campaigns and clear guidelines for the use of social media in legal proceedings. Additionally, it stresses the importance of data privacy and security, advocating for measures to protect individuals’ information online This paper also delves into the challenges posed by social media, particularly regarding misinformation and bias. The rapid spread of false information on these platforms can distort public perceptions and compromise the authenticity of legal processes. To address these challenges, the paper suggests implementing public education campaigns to raise awareness about the risks of misinformation. Additionally, clear guidelines for the use of social media in legal proceedings are recommended to ensure transparency and accountability. Collaborative efforts between legal professionals and social media companies are proposed to develop strategies for combating misinformation and enhancing the integrity of the legal decision-making process.
KEYWORDS: social media, legal decision making, public opinion, misinformation, data privacy, equilibrium
- INTRODUCTION
“Social media is not just an extension of the internet; it’s an extension of our lives.”
– Mark W. Schaefer
Social media is like a storyteller of each and everybody’s lives shaping and narrating our daily lives i.e. one post at a time. Social media integrates online platforms and websites that enable people to create, share, and exchange multimedia material, ideas, and information with each other.
topics, including legal matters. From high-profile court cases to everyday legal disputes, social media has emerged as a powerful force shaping public opinion, influencing legal proceedings, and even impacting judicial decisions. This paper seeks to explore the complex interplay between social media and legal decision making, examining the ways in which online discourse, information dissemination, and public sentiment intersect with the legal system.
Communication is the process of conveying information, ideas, or emotions between individuals or groups on the other hand Effective communication facilitates the exchange of meaning, contributing to relationships, knowledge sharing, and activity coordination. It involves expressing oneself considerately, acknowledging cultural nuances and the specific context. Social media enables people to connect and share thoughts and opinions, but it also allows for the posting of unfiltered or harsh comments. Social media is so prevalent nowadays that the Consumers frequently review hotels, restaurants, retailers, or lawyers online, sharing experiences, whether positive or negative.
Social media’s widespread adoption has transformed how people communicate, exchange information, and discuss legal issues. It now plays a significant role in shaping public opinion, influencing legal proceedings, and impacting judicial decisions. This paper examines how online discourse, information sharing, and public sentiment interact with the legal system.
- METHOD
The paper explores the impact of social media on legal decision-making, discussing its role in shaping public opinion and influencing legal proceedings, while also addressing challenges such as misinformation and bias. It also discusses strategies to mitigate risks, including public education campaigns and clear guidelines for social media use in legal proceedings. It also advocates for collaborative efforts between legal professionals and social media companies.
- RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study employs a qualitative research methodology to explore the impact of social media on legal decision-making. Qualitative research is chosen for its ability to provide in-depth insights into complex phenomena like the influence of social media on legal proceedings. The methodology includes data collection, data analysis, and interpretation of findings.
A comprehensive review of existing literature, including academic articles, books, and reports, forms the basis of data collection. This review covers various sources such as JSTOR, Google Scholar, and PubMed, along with reputable news sources and legal publications. This process aims to understand the current state of knowledge on the topic and identify key themes and trends in the literature. The collected data is systematically examined and interpreted to identify patterns, themes, and relationships. A thematic analysis approach is used, involving the identification, analysis, and reporting of patterns within the data. Themes are identified based on recurring patterns or ideas, with the analysis being iterative, refining and revising themes as new data is collected and analysed.
The findings are interpreted in the context of existing literature and theoretical frameworks. This involves synthesizing the findings to draw conclusions and implications for legal decision-making. The interpretation also considers the limitations of the study and suggests areas for further research. In conclusion, this research methodology provides a comprehensive and systematic approach to exploring the impact of social media on legal decision-making. It allows for a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between social media and the legal system.
- REVIEW OF LITRATURE
social media has completely transformed how people connect and interact with one another, and it has had a big impact on how information and news are shared and used. Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have become integral parts of daily life for millions worldwide, shaping public discourse and influencing opinions on various current events. Also talking about the impact of social medias on current events i.e. profound, offering of real-time updates and diverse perspectives on unfolding stories. It has democratized the dissemination of information, allowing individuals to share news, express opinions, and participate in discussions on a global scale. This rapid dissemination of information has led to the viral spread of news, sometimes even before traditional media outlets can report on it.
Talking about the legal arena; Law firms and legal decision-making have been significantly impacted by social media in a number of ways. This tool facilitates rapid access to an extensive database of legal knowledge, supporting legal professionals in their investigation along with choice-making. Additionally, social media platforms facilitate real-time communication and collaboration among legal professionals, clients, and colleagues, enhancing information sharing and resource pooling. Furthermore, these platforms serve as effective tools for networking, enabling legal professionals to expand their professional circles and attract new clients.
Also, if we are talking about the decision-making process how can we forget public opinion and public perception. Social media also plays a role in shaping public perception of legal matters, potentially impacting legal strategies and outcomes. However, its use raises ethical considerations, such as confidentiality and privacy, which must be carefully addressed. Despite these challenges, social media offers valuable opportunities for legal research, marketing, and compliance monitoring, highlighting its significant and evolving role in the legal field.
Despite its many benefits, social media can be criticized for its role in spreading misinformation and promoting polarizing narratives. The echo chambers which are created by social media algorithms can reinforce existing beliefs and contribute to the spread of fake news, making it challenging to discern fact from fiction.
The concept of social media is not new rather it dates back to the time when Graffiti was relevant in the society. Graffiti began to emerge in 20th century. The archaeological discoveries at Pompeii provide examples of writing on an analogue wall—otherwise known as “graffiti” and this gives us evidence with regard to kind to platform that was earlier used as a medium in the society to share their ideas over there similar to that of social media as of now. Graffiti can be defined as the unauthorized visual expression or marking on public or private property, utilizing various mediums such as spray paint, markers, or digital platforms.
The emergence of social media platforms parallels the historical evolution of graffiti as a means of public expression and communication. Just as graffiti artists utilize physical spaces to convey messages, social media users utilize digital platforms to express opinions, share content, and engage in discourse, often without explicit authorization.
Thus, in this very twenty-first century, the introduction of social media has given the idea of the “writing on the wall” a new meaning whereby, social media acts as a digital canvas for people to express themselves, influencing the conversation of the day. People ‘write on the wall’ via posts, tweets, images, and videos on social media sites like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and others.
social media has undergone a remarkable transformation since its inception in the 1990s with the advent of online communities and forums like Usenet and AOL. The emergence of social networking in the 2000s saw platforms like Friendster, LinkedIn, and Facebook that popularized the idea of connecting friends and acquaintances through personal updates and photos. Microblogging services like Twitter introduced the concept of sharing short updates that are ideal for sharing news and real-time updates. Visual content then came into focus with platforms like Instagram and Snapchat that allows users to share photos and short videos. LinkedIn became the dominant platform for professional networking, while YouTube became the go-to platform for videos. Messaging apps like WhatsApp, Messenger, and WeChat were widely adopted as a more private and immediate way of communication. Twitch, Facebook Live and Instagram Live popularized live streaming, while Reddit and Discord became popular for hosting niche interest-based communities. Ephemeral content became popular with the rise of platforms such as TikTok, with short-form engaging videos. Recently, there has been a focus on audio-based social networking with platforms like Clubhouse and Twitter Spaces. The shifting trends have focused on visual, immediate, and interactive forms of communication, privacy, real-time content. These changes have impacted how people communicate and interact with each other, and the future may hold even more exciting changes.
New research from the Harvard Business Review suggests that consistent interaction and responses to negative feedback on social media may not be as helpful as brands commonly thought. While it’s important to manage negative perception online, these reactions may perpetuate a negative social image. In the realm of legal decision-making, unconstructive criticism is prevalent on social media. Constructive criticism offers a platform for feedback, but it’s crucial to consider its real-world implications. Social media often spreads unverified information, making it increasingly opinion-oriented. Providing constructive criticism requires a delicate approach based on facts, not unverified opinions. It is essential to promote informed, balanced, and constructive criticism that enhances our understanding of the world.
Hashtags and trends in social media categorize content and enhance its discoverability, fostering engagement among users discussing similar topics. In legal decision making, these elements are crucial. They offer real-time insights into public opinion, sentiment, and reactions to legal cases, aiding lawyers and judges in understanding the potential impact of their decisions on the public.
In India, the 2012 Delhi gang rape case, also known as the Nirbhaya case, is a significant example where social media, including hashtags, played a crucial role in legal decision-making. The incident sparked nationwide outrage and led to massive protests both on the streets and online. The hashtag #JusticeForNirbhaya became viral, with people across the country demanding swift justice for the victim. Social media platforms served as a tool for organizing protests, spreading awareness, and putting pressure on the legal system to expedite the trial. The widespread public outcry and the online campaign played a role in influencing the government to introduce stricter laws regarding sexual crimes against women.
Another landmark case in India whereby trendy hashtags played a significant role is the 2018 Kathua rape case. The brutal rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl in Jammu and Kashmir sparked widespread outrage across the country. The hashtag #JusticeForAsifa went viral on social media, with people demanding justice for the victim and calling for harsh punishment for the perpetrators. The case highlighted issues of sexual violence against children and communal tensions in the region. Social media again played a crucial role in mobilizing public opinion and putting pressure on the government and legal system to ensure swift and fair justice. The trial of the accused was closely followed on social media, with updates and developments in the case shared widely.
Also on of the incident known as Dhule lynching case, which occurred in Maharashtra’s Dhule district in 2018. Another notable case in India where social media accusations went viral is the 2018 mob lynching of five individuals in Maharashtra’s Dhule district. The incident was triggered by rumours spread on social media platforms like WhatsApp about a group of “child kidnappers” roaming the area. The rumours led to a mob attacking and lynching five individuals, despite there being no evidence to support the allegations.
In this case, Additional Sessions Judge F.A.M. Khwaja reflects on the dark aspects of modern India, particularly the impact of high-speed internet and social media. He describes how a climate of fear, fueled by rumours can be spread through social media, leading to a devastating incident in a small tribal village in Maharashtra. He emphasized how quickly slander and misinformation can spread on social media, disrupting the lives and mindset of entire communities.
These cases illustrate the complex and powerful impact of social media on legal decision-making and public discourse in India. Social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and TikTok are of great importance as they are used to mobilize support, raise awareness, and pressure authorities for justice not only this but they also highlight the risks of misinformation and false accusations.
In every situation, there are pros and cons, and social media is no exception. lead to unfortunate outcomes, which goes against the fundamental legal principle of “audi alteram partem,” meaning “hear the other side.”
It’s evident from these cases that social media, with its hashtags and trends, has significantly influenced legal decision-making in India. The use of platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and TikTok has not only mobilized public opinion and pressure but also shed light on important issues and marginalized voices. However, alongside these benefits, there are also risks, such as the spread of misinformation and the potential for bias
While it has the potential to democratize access to justice and amplify marginalized voices, it also poses challenges that must be addressed to uphold the integrity of the legal system. As technology continues to evolve, the relationship between social media and the law will likely continue to evolve, presenting both opportunities and obstacles for the legal landscape.
- ANALYSIS
Social media has fundamentally changed the landscape of legal decision-making in India, offering both opportunities and challenges. One of the key aspects of social media’s impact on legal proceedings is its ability to shape public opinion. Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have become powerful tools for mobilizing support, raising awareness, and pressuring authorities for justice. The use of hashtags and viral posts can amplify public sentiment, potentially influencing the court of public opinion and even legal outcomes. The 2012 Delhi gang rape case, commonly known as the Nirbhaya case, is a prime example of how social media can influence legal decision-making. The widespread outrage and protests that followed the incident were fueled, in part, by social media campaigns. The hashtag #JusticeForNirbhaya went viral, galvanizing public support and putting pressure on the legal system to deliver swift justice. This case highlighted the ability of social media to mobilize mass movements and shape public discourse on legal matters.
Similarly, the 2018 Kathua rape case demonstrated the power of social media in influencing legal proceedings. The hashtag #JusticeForAsifa became a rallying cry on social media, with people across the country demanding justice for the victim. The case also highlighted the role of social media in raising awareness about issues such as sexual violence against children and communal tensions. Social media served as a platform for organizing protests, sharing information, and putting pressure on the government and legal system to ensure a fair trial and justice for the victim.
Nevertheless, the effect of social media on the formation of legal judgments comes with its fair share of difficulties. A significant issue is the proliferation of false information and fabricated news. The contagious nature of social media allows for the swift dissemination of inaccurate details, which can distort public perspectives and compromise the authenticity of legal processes.
Another challenge posed by social media is the risk of bias and manipulation which can be well understood by the mob lynching case Social media algorithms can create echo chambers, where individuals are only exposed to information that reinforces their existing beliefs. This can lead to a distorted view of reality and impact the fairness of legal proceedings. The prevalence of online activism and hashtag campaigns also creates pressure on the legal system to deliver certain outcomes, potentially compromising the impartiality of the judiciary.
In spite of these difficulties, social media presents chances to enhance the process of making legal decisions and plays a very important role shaping the public opinion, influencing the legal decision making.
- SUGGESTION
In order to make the most of social media’s potential for enhancing legal decision-making and minimizing its drawbacks, there are several steps that can be implemented. Here are few suggestions with regard to this:
Education and Awareness: Conduct public education campaigns to raise awareness about the risks of misinformation. Encourage individuals to verify information before sharing it.
Regulation, Transparency, and Accountability in Social Media Use: Developing clear guidelines for the use of social media in legal proceedings is essential. These guidelines should include rules for the admissibility of social media evidence and guidelines for the conduct of legal professionals online. Ensuring transparency in the use of social media by legal professionals is crucial. Judges, in particular, should avoid expressing opinions online that could compromise their impartiality. Adhering to these guidelines will promote fairness and integrity in the legal system.
Data Privacy and Security: Implement measures to protect individuals’ data on social media. Ensure that personal information is not misused or shared without consent.
Collaboration and Engagement: Collaborate with social media companies to develop tools for combating misinformation. Provide training for legal professionals on how to use social media responsibly.
By incorporating these recommendations, we can optimize the advantages of social media in the process of making legal decisions while reducing its potential drawbacks. Social media possesses the potential to greatly impact justice; however, it is imperative to exercise caution in its usage to guarantee a just legal system.
- CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the journey from ancient graffiti to the contemporary landscape of social media reflects a timeless human inclination to express ideas publicly. In conclusion, the impact of social media on legal decision-making cannot be ignored in today’s technology-driven world.
While social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have provided us with real-time updates and information on legal cases, they also present challenges that can affect the fairness and integrity of the legal system.
One of the major effects of social media on legal decision-making is its ability to shape public opinion. People now have the power to voice their views and perspectives on legal matters, which can influence the court of public opinion and even impact legal outcomes. The rapid dissemination of information through hashtags, viral posts, and trending topics has the potential to mobilize public support, raise awareness, and put pressure on authorities to deliver justice. The 2012 Delhi gang rape case and the 2018 Kathua rape case in India are prime examples of how social media campaigns played very crucial role in raising awareness, organizing protests, and influencing the legal system.
However, the influence of social media on legal decision-making is not without its challenges. The spread of misinformation and fake news poses a significant risk, as inaccurate information can distort public perceptions and compromise the authenticity of legal processes. Social media’s democratization of news reporting has also led to the inclusion of unverified or exaggerated information, making it difficult for individuals to differentiate between fact and fiction.
The ability of jurors to access information and opinions outside the courtroom through social media can pose threats to a fair trial. It is crucial to establish rules and guidelines to mitigate the influence of social media on jurors and ensure that legal decisions are based solely on evidence presented in court.
Moreover, the phenomenon of “trial by social media” has emerged where public opinions expressed on social media can exert pressure on judges and lawyers to deliver outcomes that align with popular sentiment, rather than maintaining the principles of fairness and justice. Judges need to exercise impartiality and resist the influence of online public sentiment to uphold the integrity of the legal system.
In order to navigate the complex relationship between social media and the law, it is essential to enhance public awareness about the risks of misinformation, establish clear guidelines for the use of social media in legal proceedings, protect data privacy, and collaborate with social media companies to combat misinformation. Striking a balance between leveraging the benefits of social media for legal decision-making and addressing its drawbacks is crucial to ensure a fair and transparent legal system.
In conclusion, social media has the potential to revolutionize legal decision-making by amplifying awareness, mobilizing support, and facilitating access to information. However, it is imperative that we navigate these new challenges responsibly to preserve the integrity and fairness of the legal system in the digital age. By establishing guidelines, promoting critical thinking, and upholding the principles of fairness and justice, we can harness the power of social media to enhance, rather than impede, the legal decision-making process.
In summary, as we navigate the dynamic impact of social media on legal decision-making, it becomes crucial to leverage its positive aspects while addressing the inherent challenges. Achieving a delicate equilibrium between transparency and the preservation of legal integrity necessitates a collective commitment. Through the implementation of well-thought-out regulations, assurance of the credibility of social media-derived evidence, and the unwavering dedication to fairness and impartiality, we can cultivate a synergistic relationship between social media and the legal system. Only through such discerning efforts can we harness the advantages of technology while upholding the enduring values that serve as the bedrock of a just and equitable society.
- REFRENCES
- Mark W. Schaefer, known: The Handbook for Building and Unleashing Your Personal Brand in the Digital Age (2017)
- LaFrance, A. (2016). The graffiti at Pompeii. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/03/adrienne-was-here/475719/
- Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary 625 (11th ed. 2021).
- Maryville University Online, Madams, The Evolution of Social Media: How Did It Begin, and Where Could It Go Next?, (Oct. 30, 2023), https://online.maryville.edu/blog/evolution-social-media/.
- CCW Digital, New Study Shows How Criticism on Social Media Can Negatively Impact Your Brand, (Aug. 29, 2023), https://www.customercontactweekdigital.com/social-mobile-web/news/new-study-shows-how-criticism-on-social-media-can-negatively-impact-your-brand.
- Toi-Online, What is Nirbhaya case?, THE TIMES OF INDIA (Dec. 18, 2019), https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/what-is-nirbhaya-case/articleshow/72868430.cms
- The West Indian Online, Justice for Asifa, https://www.thewestindianonline.com/justiceforasifa/ (last visited [16 Feb. 24]).
- Modak, S. (2024, February 8). Dhule lynching case: Social media disinformation like tornado affecting thought process of masses- Court. The Indian Express. Retrieved from https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/dhule-lynching-case-social-media-disinformation-tornado-affecting-thought-process-masses-court-9149479/
Submitted by:
Tejshri Kumari
(3rd Year Law Student)
Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Institute of Law
Bhubaneswar, Odisha