Abstract
Money laundering in casinos has emerged as one of the most significant global issues, where criminals use these gambling platforms to hide illegal monies and make them appear legitimate. This paper attempts to analyze the legal framework that deals with money laundering in casinos and identifies causes of this problem. Another significant area of study is the overall effect of money laundering on the gambling world, primarily focusing on its adverse effects on financial systems and individuals. In this regard, the effectiveness of existing laws and regulations are critically reviewed, including problems that regulators face. The paper also presents recommendations from experts along with government initiatives to minimize risks of financial crimes in the gambling world. The study underscores the importance of increased international cooperation, the introduction of high-tech monitoring tools for suspicious transactions, and the use of stronger enforcement measures. By strengthening the legal framework and improving practices in the industry, the paper presents the argument that the risk of money laundering in the gambling sector could be highly mitigated for the good of the economy and the community.
Keywords
Money Laundering, Gambling, Legal Frameworks, Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Casinos, Online Gambling, Cryptocurrency, Financial Crimes.
Introduction
Money laundering in gambling is the use of the activities of gambling casinos, sports betting, or online gambling sites to hide the origin of funds acquired through criminal activity by persons or criminal organizations. The primary goal is to make illegal money appear legitimate by integrating it into the financial system, often through complex transactions that involve purchasing and cashing out chips, betting on outcomes, or placing wagers in ways that shadow the true source of the funds. The platform for the money launderer is vulnerable because of the high cash flow, international aspect, and many times anonymous transactions involved in gambling.
Today, the term money laundering encompasses any financial transaction that produces value from an illegal act, like tax evasion or false accounting. The term “money laundering” actually originates from the fact that Al Capone used a series of laundromats to launder money from drug smuggling, prostitution, and tax evasion.
The term casino has been defined differently in various time periods:
Small country villa: In the olden days, a casino referred to a small country villa, summerhouse, or social club.
Public building: In the 19th century, casinos started referring to public buildings that were built for the entertainment of people, such as dancing, gambling, listening to music, and playing sports.
Building for aristocratic gambling: Casino came to mean in the 1800s a building for aristocratic gambling.
Money laundering in gambling is the process through which criminals use gambling platforms to cover and legalize the gains from illegal activities. This exploitation takes advantage of the high cash flow, anonymity, and international reach often associated with gambling operations. It involves complex transactions designed to disguise the source of illicit funds, making them appear as legitimate gambling winnings. The gambling industry is perfect for laundering criminal funds. It encompasses a vast array of businesses that handle high-volume transactions (often in cash) at a fast pace, including land-based casinos, online casinos, pubs and clubs hosting poker machines, and both land-based and online sports betting operations. And it is a massive industry that is growing at an exponential rate. In 2021, the global gambling industry was at an all-time high in revenues, with USD 261 billion in the US and EUR 87.2 billion in Europe (Statista). The American Gaming Association reported that U.S. commercial gaming revenue hit a record $53 billion in 2021.(FORBES)
The fact that criminals can exploit such an industry to launder money is not exactly a discovery. For instance, Crown Casinos in Melbourne and Perth, Australia is charged with hundreds of millions of dollars laundering through these casinos between 2014 to 2019 by “junket” programs with whom the casino and their counterpart tour operators facilitate this short period of gambling that had been set by certain foreign jurisdiction’s high roller players. (Pope Henry)
In 2006, a Virginia attorney was found guilty of laundering USD 250,000 at the Taj Mahal Casino in Atlantic City. He deposited stolen funds totalling USD 250,000 in a gambling account, acquired a casino marker worth USD 10,000, lost USD 1,000, and withdrew the rest. (Isys and Dornbierer)
Money laundering through casinos in india
Money laundering through casinos is a significant concern in India as it provides an avenue for dirty money to be “cleaned” by integrating it into the legitimate economy. As an industry, casinos are relatively regulated, but the structure of the industry makes it vulnerable to exploitation for money laundering. Here’s an overview of the situation:
Indian Casino Scene
Legal Casinos
Casinos are legal in Goa, Sikkim, and Daman under specific regulatory frameworks.
They generate huge revenues for the local economy but are vulnerable to being used as a channel for illegal activities.
Online Gambling:
Online casinos and gambling sites have expanded, often existing in the gray areas of regulation. These sites make it relatively easy to shift money across jurisdictions without direct regulation.
Regulatory Framework in India
prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: (Financial intelligence unit- India) Requires the reporting of suspicious financial transactions.
Casinos need to maintain customer’s records, especially for transactions involving large amounts.
Know Your Customer (KYC) Norms:
Customers must undergo identity verification, which has made it challenging to carry out money laundering using fraudulent or stolen identities.
Online Gambling Regulation
State governments are clamping down on unauthorized online gambling websites, but there is no consistency in their enforcement.
Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)
FIU tracks suspicious transactions, including those generated by casinos, to look for money laundering trends.
Methodology
This paper employs a qualitative research approach based on an analysis of secondary data sourced from various reliable and authoritative sources. These sources include legal reports, case studies, peer-reviewed journals, and publications issued by regulatory authorities and international organizations. The reliance on such a wide variety of data ensures that the study has a holistic and deep understanding of the issues involved in money laundering in the gambling sector.
Literature Review
Casinos and other gaming venues have long been an easy conduit for money laundering because of the cash-based nature of these businesses. According to Levi and Reuter (2006), casinos are one of the primary money laundering targets. These establishments are very easy conduits due to large amounts of cash that become virtually impossible to trace.
The emergence of internet gambling poses new challenges for AML enforcement. The issue of anonymity of sites that provide internet-based games was one of the identified challenges in the detection of such illegalities by Grabosky et al (2001). Choo (2019) expanded on this discussion with an impact of cryptocurrencies on online gaming: decentralized, pseudo-anonymous transactions enable money launderers to bypass traditional oversight.
Levi et al. (2006) and Smith (2020) published studies on the more general effects of money laundering related to gambling. These studies depict how laundered money eats away at the integrity of financial systems, feeds organized crime, and further eats away at public confidence
in gambling organizations. They also bring into focus the economic consequences, which include lost revenue through criminal operations and the cost of regulatory efforts.
Method
Causes
- Casinos and gambling houses handle large quantities of money, therefore providing the launderers with anonymity.
- Virtual gambling websites and crypto-based casinos provide pseudo-anonymity.
- Enforcement loopholes arise from the diversity of the regulatory systems
- Illicit money can be layered freely because many transaction channels are available in the gambling.
Societal Impacts
- Money laundering leads to financial system destabilization as the illegal money is channeled into these systems.
- Laundered money is commonly used to finance other crimes, such as trade in humans and terrorism
- General money laundering gives the gaming sector and regulatory authorities a perception of illegitimacy.
Statistics
- FATF (2021) states that annually across the globe laundered amounts stand at more than
$1.6 trillion with gaming making a significant percentage. FATF (2021)
- Statista reports that 2023 shows that online gambling revenues are in excess of $81 billion of which is suspected to have come from illegal sources. “Online Gambling Revenues (2023).” (statista, 2023)
- The Crown Casino scandal in Australia revealed a million-dollar laundering operation involved with the high-roller programs.(Pope Henry)
The report highlights a growing nexus of online unregulated casinos and cryptocurrencies in the region. Together, these tools have allowed criminals to transfer their ill-gotten gains around the world faster than authorities can track or freeze them.
“Casinos and related high-cash-volume businesses have been vehicles for underground banking and money laundering for years, but the explosion of underregulated online gambling platforms and crypto exchanges has changed the game,” said Jeremy Douglas, UNODC Regional Representative for Southeast Asia and the Pacific. (FATF/APG)
According to Douglas, this explosion is a new age of faster anonymized transactions, not hindered by banking regulations, that has “supercharged the criminal business environment across Southeast Asia.” (UNODC)
For example, the crypto currency Tether Stable Coin (USDT), pegged against the U.S. dollar, was one of the financial instruments listed among the most often used by transnational organized crime groups today according to the region’s financial intelligence authorities. USDT is one of
the most liquid crypto options; users made more than US$17 billion in illicit USDT transactions between September 2022 and September 2023, For instance, the audit shows that these transactions are related to illegal commodity trades, unlawful collection and payment processes, and other criminal activities.
The UNODC report links this influx of trading on the underground banking web to the increase in cross-border illegal gambling. According to industry estimates, the black market gambling industry generated more than US$145 billion in China alone in 2020. (Pope)
Another recent case involved Crown Resorts, Australia’s largest gambling and entertainment group, which was found to have failed to prevent South Asian transnational organized crime groups from laundering hundreds of billions through its casinos. In July 2023, Australia’s federal court ruled that the casino operator should pay a AU$450 million (US$300 million) penalty for what amounted to more than 500 breaches of the country’s anti-money laundering laws. (AUSTRAC)
Fines and Penalties Imposed on Casinos
Regulators have taken significant steps against casino operators to curb money laundering. For example, in 2010, Wynn Macau Ltd was fined a whopping $50 million for failing to report several suspicious transactions that occurred at their premises (Alessa). This is an example of the high costs of non-compliance in the casino industry.
Another prominent example is The Star Entertainment Group in Australia was fined $62 million due to failure to stop money laundering from its Sydney casino. Thus, this huge sum sets an example of severe punishments casinos may face by way of monetary loss for the inefficiency in detecting and further preventing money laundering. (financial crime academy)
In addition, regulatory bodies have not been shy about taking casino operators to court. AUSTRAC, the financial intelligence agency of Australia, fined Star Entertainment a record
$100 million for permitting money transfers through unclear channels, showing the gravity of the breaches (ComplyAdvantage). AUSTRAC also filed a case against SkyCity Adelaide for its alleged “serious and systemic non-compliance” with AML and Counter-Terrorism Financing (CTF) regulations. (financial crime academy)
Anti-Money Laundering Laws INDIA
In India, the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) is the primary authority responsible for investigating and prosecuting money laundering in casinos
The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (“PMLA”), and the rules issued thereunder (“PML Rules”), provides the key legislative framework for the prosecution of money laundering. The main legal authority responsible for investigating and prosecuting money laundering offenses under the PMLA at the national level is the Directorate of Enforcement (“ED”), under the guardianship of the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance. Besides the above, regulators such as the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”), and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (“IRDAI”)
are empowered to address issues related to money laundering activities and determine guidelines for AML standards. These guidelines, read with the PMLA and PML Rules, form the core of the legal framework for AML law and enforcement in India.
Some international organizations that help with AML include:
BCBS
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) sets global standards for banking supervision to prevent the banking sector from being used for money laundering and terrorist financing.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
The Financial Action Task Force is an intergovernmental organization committed to fighting money laundering and the financing of terrorism. With 36 member states, the FATF’s jurisdiction stretches around the world and covers every major financial centre. Its role is to establish global standards for AML compliance and monitor their effective implementation. In furthering that goal, the FATF periodically publishes updated AML/CFT guidance.
The European Union
EU 5AMLD and 6AMLD
The mechanism that the European Union uses to harmonize AML/CFT legislation across its member states is through the Anti-Money Laundering Directives. Periodically published, the money laundering directives are updated to reflect the current money laundering, terrorism financing, and criminal risks facing financial markets. The EU’s Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD) was published on 9 July 2018 and came into effect on 10 January 2020, meanwhile the draft 6AMLD was published in late 2018, and came into effect in June 2021. To comply with 5-6 AMLD rules, financial institutions should be familiar with their contents: 5AMLD: The fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive focuses on the regulation of cryptocurrency, introduces a legal definition of cryptocurrency, reporting obligations, and rules for crypto wallets. 5MLD also introduces new legal requirements for prepaid cards, transactions involving high-value goods, beneficial ownership, customers from high-risk third countries, and Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) lists.
6AMLD: The directive includes several provisions related to a harmonized definition of money laundering offenses, expansion of the scope of money laundering and criminal liability of persons associated with it, and tougher punishment for those convicted of laundering money.
UK
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Being the one with all forms of self-governance, that is not governmental, but independent, the Financial Conduct Authority regulates the UK financial services industry, including to fight money laundering and also other criminal activities such as financing terrorism. The main FCA objectives include safeguarding consumers, maintaining market stability and integrity, while
ensuring fair competition. Furthermore, it has the mandate for implementing rules and conducting investigations to pursue those objectives.
United States
The Bank Secrecy Act
Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) This is the United State’s main anti-money laundering law and is overseen by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). The BSA is directed at money laundering, although its scope has been more than just that. To illustrate, it was enhanced by the Patriot Act back in 2001 on provisions for countering terrorist financing (CFT).
Hong Kong
Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA)
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority is in charge of ensuring that the monetary policy of Hong Kong and the banking system remain stable. As authorized under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance, the HKMA is the relevant regulatory authority charged with preventing money laundering and the financing of terrorism. In this role, it strives to make sure financial institutions in Hong Kong comply with various legal obligations, of which the most crucial is establishing and maintaining an effective AML/CFT program
Singapore
The Monetary Authority of Singapore, or MAS, has the mandate to act as the city-state’s central bank and regulate its financial sector. In this role, the duties of MAS include conducting monetary policy, supervising financial institutions, managing reserves and assets, and developing Singapore’s international financial status. Financial institutions must comply with MAS AML policy, which is set out in its Notices on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism.
Australia
AUSTRAC
The Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre, AUSTRAC is the Australian government’s financial intelligence agency responsible for fighting money laundering, terrorism financing, fraud, and other financial crimes. AUSTRAC operates under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 in identifying criminal threats and abuses of the Australian financial system.
Key Legislative Acts Addressing Money Laundering and Financial Crimes in the United States
- Bank Secrecy Act 1970
- Money Laundering Control Act 1986
- Anti-Drug Abuse Act 1988
- Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act 1992
- Money Laundering Suppression Act 1994
- Money Laundering and Financial Crimes Strategy Act 1998
- Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act)
- Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004
Robust AML Compliance Programs: Why It Matters
In order to successfully comply with AML regulations, casinos need to establish and maintain strong AML compliance programs. Such programs should include policies, procedures, and controls designed to detect and prevent money laundering activities within the casino.
A typical comprehensive AML compliance program for a casino would include:
- Risk assessments: Casinos should carry out periodic risk assessments to determine and evaluate the particular money laundering risks they are exposed to. This enables preventive measures to be tailored toward those risks.
- Employee training: Training employees is crucial to ensure that they know their obligations and the need for AML compliance. Training programs should include matters such as suspicious transactions recognition, reporting obligations, and consequences of non-compliance.
- Recordkeeping: A casino is supposed to maintain all accurate and updated records of customer’s transactions and due diligence efforts. Such records shall be accessible for the purpose of regulatory authoritie’s auditing and investigations.
- Internal controls and independent audits: Internal controls like segregation of duties and periodic independent audits help ensure the casino is compliant with AML regulations and the effectiveness of the AML compliance program. Casinos can protect their operations and customers along with the integrity of the financial system by giving importance to strong AML compliance programs. Compliance with AML regulations makes the casino sector contribute to global efforts in combating money laundering and financing illicit activities.
As the gambling industry evolves, regulatory bodies continue to update AML regulations to address emerging risks. Casinos must be well-informed of the recent changes in regulations, which include those introduced by FINTRAC in Canada starting June 1, 2021 (Osler). By following AML regulations and continually improving AML compliance programs, casinos can help create a safer environment for gambling.
Challenges facing AML compliance in the casino industry include:
- High volume and cash transactions
– Casinos conduct large cash transactions, which makes it easy for some individuals to introduce illicit funds into the system without detection.
- difficulty to track
- Certain customers play under nicknames or use anonymous modes, like slots or bet vending machines. It will then be a challenge to detect their identities and patterns.
- Complex Gamble Actions
- There is a diverse range of gambling and betting activities including casino games, sportsbook wagers, and web gaming. All these variations and options of gambling make monitoring activities and identification of suspicions difficult.
- Internet as well as Traditional Casino
- Online gambling platforms are usually associated with land-based casinos, which makes it more challenging to track and monitor between the two.
- Cross-Border Transactions
- International customers and cross-border transactions are highly exposed to money laundering due to the fact that jurisdictions have different AML laws.
- VIP Programs
- High-value clients (also known as “VIPs” or “whales”) may be given preferential treatment, and their high-value transactions might not be scrutinized sufficiently because of their status.
- Inadequate Staff Training
- Casino staff may not be trained enough to identify and report suspicious transactions.
- Changing Techniques of Money Laundering
- Money launderers are constantly innovating new sophisticated techniques to evade the AML controls already in place, so casinos must keep up with sophisticated detection systems.
- Regulatory Differences
- Different AML regulations in various countries and even states can create complexity for casinos operating in multiple jurisdictions.
- Cryptocurrency and Digital Payments
- The increasing adoption of cryptocurrencies and digital wallets in gambling is posing a new AML challenge, as they are pseudo-anonymous.
- Cost of Compliance
- It is expensive to establish proper AML systems and technologies, especially for small casinos.
Solutions to Obstacles (Financial Action Task Force (FATF))
- Advanced transaction monitoring systems must be in place.
- Enhanced Due Diligence must be conducted for high-value customers.
- Educate employees on AML laws and suspicious activity indicators .
- Partner with banks and the regulatory bodies in sharing information.
- Utilize AI and data analytics to identify unusual patterns.
- Establish a strong compliance culture throughout the organization.
CONCLUSION
Money laundering in the casinos takes advantage of the high flow of cash and regulatory gaps of the industry so that is a serious danger for the financial system also. International frameworks, such as FATF, form the base, but issues of disparate application, technological gaps and minimal inter-agency coordination still prevail. This can become possible in AML through due diligence, monitoring, and reporting, but the legal evolution is still ongoing, balancing transparency and privacy. The loopholes need to be closed and casinos must run responsibly, hence it is a global effort with strong collaboration and harmonized laws.
Samit Kachore
Dr.D.Y.Patil Law College
Citations
- Isys, Lam, and Andrew Dornbierer. “Money laundering through the gambling industry.” Basel Institute LEARN, https://learn.baselgovernance.org/course/view.php?id=150 . Accessed TUESDAY December 2024.
- the European Parliament. “Updated Money Laundering Regulations.” 2020, https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/updated-money-laundering-regula tions#:~:text=The%20 Gambling%20 Commission%20has%20 now,which%20comes%20into%20force%20immediately Accessed Tuesday
DECEMBER 2024.
- Pope Henry. “Casinos and Crypto Major Drivers of Money Laundering in East and SoutheastAsia.”OCCRP,17 January 2024,
https://www.occrp.org/en/news/casinos-and-crypto-major-drivers-of-money-laundering-i n-east-and-southeast-asia Accessed 10 December 2024.
- financial crime academy. “Anti-Money Laundering (AML).” Game Changer:
Anti-Money Laundering Regulations in the Gaming Sector, NOVEMBER 2024, https://financialcrimeacademy.org/anti-money-laundering-in-the-gaming-sector/ Accessed TUESDAY DECEMBER 2024.
- Financial Action Task Force (FATF). “Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing
Vulnerabilities of Legal Professionals.” Financial Action Task Force (FATF), June 2023,
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Methodsandtrends/Mltf-vulnerabilities-legal-pr ofessionals.html Accessed Thursday December 2024
- Financial Action Task Force (FATF). “Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach for Legal Professionals.” Risk-Based Approach Guidance for Legal Professionals, FATF, June 2019,
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Rba-legal-professionals.h tml Accessed Thursday December 2024
- Financial Action Task Force (FATF. “Vulnerabilities of Casinos and Gaming Sector.” FATF Report on Vulnerabilities of Casinos and Gaming Sector, Financial Action Task Force (FATF), March 2009,
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Methodsandtrends/Vulnerabilitiesofcasinosandg amingsector.html Accessed Thursday December 2024.
- Financial Action Task Force. “FATF Guidance on the Risk-Based Approach for Casinos.”
FATF Risk-Based Approach for Casinos, FATF, October 2008,
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfrecommendations/Fatfguidanceontherisk-ba sedapproachforcasinos.html Accessed Thursday December 2024.
- (FATF/APG). “Casino Typologies Report (FATF/APG).” Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG), FATF and Asia/Pacific Group (APG), 2023,
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/countries/global-network/asia-pacific-group-on-money-laun dering–apg-.html
https://apgml.org/methods-and-trends/page.aspx?p=8d052c1c-b9b8-45e5-9380-29d5aa12 9f45 Accessed Thursday December 2024.
- Financial Action Task Force (FATF). “Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks and Policy Responses.” COVID-19-related Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks and Policy Responses, FATF, May 2020,
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfgeneral/Covid-19-ml-tf.html Accessed Thursday December 2024
- “Online Gambling Revenues (2023).”
statista, 2023, https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/online-gambling/worldwide
Accessed Thursday December 2024.
- Financial intelligence unit- India. “Prevention of Money Laundering Act.” Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002:, Department of Economic Affairs, July 2005, https://dea.gov.in/sites/default/files/moneylaunderingact.pdf . Accessed Friday December 2024.